Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Package compression header for binhosts

2010-06-01 Thread Ned Ludd
to map each binpkg into the url space for it. ~harring -- Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] add UUID for comparison of installed package to binary package?

2010-02-14 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:11 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: On 02/14/2010 04:36 AM, Brian Harring wrote: This gets nasty... you're basically talking about the rpm equivalent of EPOCH. Not a fan of an adhoc UUID (especially since it'll become standard via portage doing it), but a *timestamp*

[gentoo-dev] Re: A Little Council Reform Anyone?

2009-07-02 Thread Ned Ludd
. More abstract ideas at this point. Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org: The dev population is quite a strange beast. I never expected to win. Nor did I, especially because you were quite low on my ballot. Congratulations. The devs have a voice one time of the year: when it comes time to vote

[gentoo-dev] A Little Council Reform Anyone?

2009-07-01 Thread Ned Ludd
The dev population is quite a strange beast. I never expected to win. Why would you vote for somebody who did not even publish a manifesto? I don't know but I love you for it. My only intention was to help offset dev-zero being able force the will of outside forces upon us. Well that has been

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] pretend --columns depends on --quiet?

2009-05-07 Thread Ned Ludd
-[2.1.6.11] Quick work around that should be safe would be to tr '[,]' ' , ' |awk '{print $3-$4}' It is expected however that -q vs no -q will result in the atoms being at the same index. -- Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] pretend --columns depends on --quiet?

2009-05-07 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 13:18 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ned Ludd wrote: On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 10:00 +0300, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote: Hi. Seems like --columns depends on -q to work: amit0 ~ # emerge -p --color=n --columns -O -q portage R

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen

2009-04-18 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:55 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 16 April 2009 19:05:46 Ned Ludd wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:50 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote: There is also

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining

2009-03-26 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 08:26 +0100, Markus Duft wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 11:44 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote: [snip] While much of what you are talking about here mainly applies to prefix, it looks to me from glancing over the code that you might of solved a long standing problem

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] prefix portage chaining

2009-03-25 Thread Ned Ludd
problem in the embedded world with cross compiling via portage. 222895 If that is the case, then I owe you a beer. one about the size of a keg. -- Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen

2009-03-17 Thread Ned Ludd
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 19:45 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 16 March 2009 18:49:04 Ned Ludd wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote: Hi all

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen

2009-03-17 Thread Ned Ludd
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote: There is also a bug with atom parsing iirc on 32bit platforms. gradm was the test case. Think we need to change from int to long. the code is documented as having 64bit limitations

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen

2009-03-16 Thread Ned Ludd
not if you are hitting it. http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-projects/portage-utils/libq/vdb_get_next_dir.c?r1=1.2r2=1.3 -- Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] qfile assumes category names contain a hyphen

2009-03-16 Thread Ned Ludd
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote: Hi all. While working on my overlay, I stumbled on an issue where qfile refused to acknowledge an installed file

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcement of The G Palmtop Environment ebuilds

2009-02-04 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 00:37 +, Angelo Arrifano wrote: On Qua, 2009-02-04 at 18:36 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote: Some packages are not automake driven. We have to detect those. make DESTDIR=${D} PREFIX=/usr \ STRIP=true ENABLE_NLS=${USE_NLS} \

Re: [gentoo-dev] Announcement of The G Palmtop Environment ebuilds

2009-02-03 Thread Ned Ludd
the stuff. Happy xcompiling, Assuming you have the G2 you could skip all that and simply merge from these .tbz2 into a $ROOT http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/embedded/armv6j-softfloat-linux-gnueabi -- Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About boosting sync

2008-12-02 Thread Ned Ludd
that FEATURES='strict' is enabled per default in all profiles. It's rather vital that things remain the way they are now. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Time to say goodbye

2008-12-01 Thread Ned Ludd
time for me to leave the Gentoo train. Marius I will always remember you as the guy who provided us with the much needed glsa*.py (thank you again) Take care and I wish you the best in all your future endeavors. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How to extract the version/revision of an installed package?

2008-11-25 Thread Ned Ludd
said a bash script. portageq still takes a few seconds to load and invokes far far to many instructions for very simple info. The 3 execve's I just posted are still faster than one portageq call. So.. foo.c wins again. :p -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] How to extract the version/revision of an installed package?

2008-11-25 Thread Ned Ludd
On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 16:31 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 04:18:22PM -0800, Ned Ludd wrote: On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 14:03 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 06:05:21PM +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote: Given the following: # qlist -Iv sys-apps

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About system and world

2007-10-21 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 15:12 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:23:45 -0700 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 13:01 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: So, what do people think about removing (some) of the special treatment for the system and world targets

Re: [gentoo-dev] Commitlog-mailinglist

2007-08-07 Thread Ned Ludd
On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 08:28 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote: * Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [07/08/06 19:20 +0300]: Well perhaps we should just look at the overall usage of the mail box instead of how it's used. I think there is already some limit in our policy for how big you can keep your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Commitlog-mailinglist

2007-08-06 Thread Ned Ludd
or at LWE. One thing to note.. If we do make mailing list for this. It should not be archived in any such way. devs that subscribe to the mailing list better not be storing mail in imap on infra resources. We simply don't have that kinda spare space to mirror all cvs commits 2-300 times. -- Ned Ludd

Re: [gentoo-dev] have any developers subscribed to -project?

2007-07-20 Thread Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 20:58 +0100, George Prowse wrote: Do any devs subscribe to -project because no replies have yet to be heard from developers... Please stop flooding my inbox. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] So...

2007-07-17 Thread Ned Ludd
the need need to comment on this stupid ass thread. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: For Jakub (and the other procmail-impaired)

2007-07-17 Thread Ned Ludd
. Or is this your swansong? If so it's l4m3. Is there some reason you feel fscking compelled to respond to every single mail on this list. You know it's guys like mostly just you that are driving us away.. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-nfp] Nominations open for the 2007/08 Trustees

2007-07-17 Thread Ned Ludd
On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 10:08 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote: Ned Ludd wrote: [Mon Jul 16 2007, 04:00:44PM CDT] Long term I worry about the foundation. No offense to anybody. I'm sure I don't know or understand the problems you/we have encountered along the way. But I think we need to face

[gentoo-dev] About to retire

2007-07-16 Thread Ned Ludd
-firewall/ebtables net-misc/netkit-telnetd net-misc/vconfig net-proxy/middleman (dead upstream) net-wireless/chillispot sys-devel/sparse -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-12 Thread Ned Ludd
it. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-12 Thread Ned Ludd
have input, now would be the time. --taco A lot of people seem to be confused about this mail of yours. Namely mainly how it does or does not relate to the core mailing list. Perhaps you could clarify the idea a little bit for those who seem confused. Thanks in advance. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

2007-07-12 Thread Ned Ludd
. FYI we do have stats.. http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-dev-per-month.xml http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/gentoo-dev-per-year.xml http://archives.gentoo.org/stats/ -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] New Linux-PAM stabling plans

2007-07-04 Thread Ned Ludd
Forwarded by request of somebody thats smart/lucky enough to not be on this list but still monitoring it. Forwarded Message From: Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: New Linux-PAM stabling plans Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 20:51:36 +0200 Hi everybody; sorry to mail

Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages

2007-06-21 Thread Ned Ludd
-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r5: it may not be legal to redistribute this. * Building package for dev-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r5 ...[ ok ] * Packages now in '/usr/portage/packages': * dev-python/pycrypto-2.0.1-r5: 188K -mike Please do the same for qpkg.c tia. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] how to handle sensitive files when generating binary packages

2007-06-20 Thread Ned Ludd
: 307K Suggestion: If you go down this sensitive route. please ensure that the generated.tbz2 is mode 600 to prevent exposing this sensitive data more than need be. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bye Gentoo!

2007-05-31 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 03:35 +0200, Bryan Østergaard wrote: It's with a bit of sadness but also a bit of relief that I'm finally retiring from Gentoo. I've been a Gentoo developer for nearly 4 years now and I like to at least pretend that I've made some important contributions to Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bye Gentoo!

2007-05-31 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 08:47 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 31 May 2007 00:05:13 -0700 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can understand your frustration and all but I expected and assumed you had big balls.. It takes more balls to go against the prevailing stagnation than to just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bye2u Gentoo

2007-05-31 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:21 -0700, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote: Grmbl Can you do us a favor and provide us with a clone, for doing MIPS keywording? Looks like Kumba has been quite active doing it recently. Alexander Færøy wrote: Hey, It is my time to leave Gentoo as well. It

[gentoo-dev] Maintainers desired for a few simple pkgs.

2007-05-30 Thread Ned Ludd
I'm looking to get rid of a few ebuilds I half ass maintain. net-wireless/chillispot (Open source captive portal or wireless LAN access point controller) sys-devel/sparse (C semantic parser) Both are relativity low maintenance. Any takers? pretty please with party socks on top. -- Ned Ludd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Planning for automatic assignment of bugs

2007-04-27 Thread Ned Ludd
in this thread where maintainers have to opt in as I'm sure the metadata.xml files wont be updated by enough people to really gain the benefit of what we are trying to do here if they have to do opt in. Thanks. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Please fix your metadata.xml ASAP

2007-04-26 Thread Ned Ludd
in the near future. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

2007-04-20 Thread Ned Ludd
it wrong -mike -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Deskzilla license for Gentoo Bugzilla for everyone

2007-04-20 Thread Ned Ludd
TY3o9fnj09fsmbEZut3VZac= =gPXZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-core] Re: [gentoo-dev] Deskzilla license for Gentoo Bugzilla for everyone

2007-04-20 Thread Ned Ludd
it, and spread the word ;-) Bjarke Ned Ludd wrote: You sent this to -dev vs -core.. Pretty sure they are going to need to revoke this license now. On Fri, 2007-04-20 at 23:05 +0200, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: Hey everyone :-) Infra told me to go ahead and email

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing retired developers from project pages

2007-04-17 Thread Ned Ludd
. -- Gentoo Linux Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: extending project xml to have stuff that the project is working on and collect them as Gentoo current goals

2007-04-10 Thread Ned Ludd
. Then we require this file to be updated monthly. What do you think? I'd rather not put this stipulation into place. Unless you are proposing that planet.gentoo.org die. Which I don't think you are doing.. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] base packages up for grabs

2007-04-09 Thread Ned Ludd
. In reality it should be fairly trivial to maintain. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

2007-04-06 Thread Ned Ludd
/profile requests from people who would be interested in rapid install methods. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April

2007-04-05 Thread Ned Ludd
. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] get pci info in Linux?

2007-03-29 Thread Ned Ludd
can be unexisting. Chances are you will need to directly communicate with the kernel via a module if proc and sys are not mounted. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-03-29 Thread Ned Ludd
good one... Can you please stop taking cheap pot shots every chance you get. We all get it. You are not a fan of portage. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-03-29 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 20:06 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:57:36 -0700 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Portage or the tree? Portage is just a way of using the tree, and it's not a very good one... Can you please stop taking cheap pot shots every chance you get

Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-03-29 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 21:02 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:25:00 -0700 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are being dismissive of the hard work others are doing. I find that downright offensive. You want to write a kickass package manager then by all means do

Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

2007-03-29 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 14:03 -0700, Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote: Ned Ludd wrote: The correct reply should of been. I'm sorry I did not mean to offend anybody. I'll make an effort to not make any cheap shots Man, stop playing the silly Ooh, we are all so fragile and offendable

Re: Gentoo infra backups (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract)

2007-03-27 Thread Ned Ludd
to no benefit in the additional overhead in doing that. But if you can make a case to say robbat2 and pylon for why this would be useful to our community then I'm sure we could open up a rsync of the raw anoncvs mirror. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract

2007-03-27 Thread Ned Ludd
deep and was coming out the walls. More than one way to flood a building. :/ Flooding/burning etc are not likely to happen. See page two of the spec for more details. http://www.365main.com/images/365_Main_San_Francisco_CA.pdf -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed addition to the Social Contract

2007-03-26 Thread Ned Ludd
one data center to another. As GNi/365 Main move into more data centers world wide chances are Gentoo will be moving into those additionally as well. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] dont use `which` in ebuilds

2007-03-16 Thread Ned Ludd
/fcron/fcron-3.0.0.ebuild:33: sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.1-r1.ebuild:33: sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.1.ebuild:33: -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] dont use `which` in ebuilds

2007-03-12 Thread Ned Ludd
-3.0.0.ebuild:33: sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.1-r1.ebuild:33: sys-process/fcron/fcron-3.0.1.ebuild:33: x11-misc/xoo/xoo-0.7.ebuild:25: -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] LC_ALL and friends in make.conf

2007-03-08 Thread Ned Ludd
shouldnt be ignoring these sort of problems, we should be fixing them Seems a forced ignore would fix them. (problem solved! next bug..) -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] more up to date minimal install cd

2007-03-03 Thread Ned Ludd
actually helping *at all*), the chances of a project such as nightly builds ever taking off is well beyond our means at this time. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-08 Thread Ned Ludd
the arrays are used in config files. i guess my point was i think we really need to be consistent here ... either arrays are OK for init.d scripts or they're not OK did you get a chance to see how hard it would be to integrate the bash array code ? -mike -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-08 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 14:49 -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote: On 2/8/07, Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As somebody that's had to hand write many of those kinds of scripts. A single rcS is not very ideal. Our init scripts are in fact mostly usable by busybox. Granted there are a few special

Re: [gentoo-dev] New network config for baselayout-ng

2007-02-07 Thread Ned Ludd
The ; seems logical. You could even use bash expansion here, provided that bash is your shell config_eth0=10.1.1.{1..30}/8; 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 See, that's not too bad is it? Nope. Thanks Roy -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-06 Thread Ned Ludd
and the change isnt invasive, then sure we'll generally make the change /me likes the direction Roy is heading with this. -mike -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eclass proposal - savedconfig.eclass

2007-02-02 Thread Ned Ludd
. But with make oldconfig, so the user gets asked about new options, and those get saved back to the savedconfig, right? No way.. Please see how we handle this in busybox.ebuild which is the best documented example of the savedconfig option in the tree. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] Topic for Feb council meeting

2007-01-29 Thread Ned Ludd
to the 9th. Rinse and repeat. If we run out of nominees then we'll need another election. Agreed. #3 From my POV having a new election potentially over and over is a waste of time and resources. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ecompress heads up

2007-01-27 Thread Ned Ludd
get people who want use to add support for their $favorite-compression that said, i would entertain the notion of auto uncompressing just .bz2, .gz, .Z and telling everyone else to toss off ... What about .zip? Not apart of the base-system. *runs away* -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] GIT vs? SVN (was: Re: Re: [RFC] Some sync control)

2007-01-25 Thread Ned Ludd
or tarballs or whatever comes in handy) and those who dislike git can just go with svn and be happy with it. Jokey -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] allow people to disambiguate built_with_use in upgrade situations

2007-01-16 Thread Ned Ludd
. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] deprecating /etc/make.profile

2007-01-10 Thread Ned Ludd
the profile. If this change does happen I'd suggest that we support make.profile symlinks as long as they exist unless the make.conf defines the variable. If variable exists it should override. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] deprecating /etc/make.profile

2007-01-10 Thread Ned Ludd
they reference make.profile or not, and flag a QA warning if they do. And packages that don't switch to the standard by the end of the grace period I guess we'll see on a last rites bulletin ;) Or we/gentoo could just support it and stop breaking the end user. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: PORTAGE_BINHOST Madness

2007-01-08 Thread Ned Ludd
/genpkgindex/genpkgindex it generates output like the following. http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/hardened/x86/Packages -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentle reminder about ChangeLog entries on profiles

2007-01-08 Thread Ned Ludd
idea for some non linux which forces all other profiles to update to mask or unmask some use flag. We/I tend to request that they update it themselves. But note taken. If I have to edit something I'll try to remember to add a ChangeLog entry. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Portage feature addition

2006-12-05 Thread Ned Ludd
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 08:58 +, Steve Long wrote: Ned Ludd wrote: cd $(portageq envvar PORTDIR)/virtual/ mkdir mike cd mike echo 'echo OWNED at phase $EBUILD_PHASE' mike-0.0.ebuild emerge -pv mike Just checking; commands run there are run as root, right? Most often yes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage feature addition

2006-12-03 Thread Ned Ludd
at phase $EBUILD_PHASE' mike-0.0.ebuild emerge -pv mike -mike -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: AT emerge info cruft attachments on bugs.g.o

2006-08-13 Thread Ned Ludd
.) /me lands in the profiles dir when he really wants the *-* dir all the time. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Make FEATURES=test the default

2006-08-05 Thread Ned Ludd
be setting this feature for the most part before stable markings. It's a noble idea. I just don't think we are ready for FEATURES=test USE=test either. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Make FEATURES=test the default

2006-08-05 Thread Ned Ludd
*isn't* there a portage team member who works on sandbox? cuz portage is a python beast and azarah wrote sandbox in c as a preload module. And really as Mike already pointed out the problem lies within the mips dynamic linker/loader.. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for August

2006-08-03 Thread Ned Ludd
of Gentoo Bugzilla [1] and anon CVS/SVN [2]. Please elaborate why you need the council to discuss ongoing active bugs that are in progress. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for August

2006-08-03 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: Ned Ludd wrote: On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 11:21 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the 2nd Thursday once a month), same bat channel (#gentoo-council

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for August

2006-08-03 Thread Ned Ludd
On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 16:07 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: Ned Ludd wrote: On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 08:06 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: Would like the Council to discuss the current state of Gentoo Bugzilla [1] and anon CVS/SVN [2]. Please elaborate why you need the council to discuss ongoing

Re: [gentoo-dev] SpanKY's Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2007

2006-07-31 Thread Ned Ludd
/amd64) lu_zero (senior dev/ppc) jaervosz (sec dev) ramereth (infra) robbat2 (gpg signing/CGL) -- No -- nattfodd (nfc) patrick (nope) pauldv (probably not/new dad) spb (really bad idea) -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] SpanKY's Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2007

2006-07-31 Thread Ned Ludd
are thinking about. Thanks for clarifying. I wish you the best of luck then. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] SpanKY's Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2007

2006-07-31 Thread Ned Ludd
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 23:30 +0200, Lars Weiler wrote: * Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] [06/07/31 16:48 -0400]: Pylon (maybe.. not around enough however) I don't know the basis for your statement, but I'm quite good around. Is it that you don't see that many emails from me here at this list

Re: [gentoo-dev] SpanKY's Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2007

2006-07-31 Thread Ned Ludd
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 21:39 +, Bryan Ãstergaard wrote: On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:48:42PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: kloeri (nice guy but dunno if the council is a proper match) Guess I could do a lot worse than nice guy :) I haven't been part of the council before so it's a bit difficult

Re: [gentoo-dev] SpanKY's Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2007

2006-07-31 Thread Ned Ludd
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 00:29 +0200, Alexandre Buisse wrote: On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 23:14:56 +0200, Ned Ludd wrote: -- No -- nattfodd (nfc) ... clue? I might agree to both :) Meaning only that we have not really worked together. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category: net-voip

2006-07-22 Thread Ned Ludd
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 17:10 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:10:51 -0400 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Every single year quarter after quarter the more updates | that happen the slower portage is becoming. | Care to solve that? This is a minute amount of time

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category: net-voip

2006-07-18 Thread Ned Ludd
category for *new* packages. [1] http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/dev/genstef/net-im -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New category: net-voip

2006-07-18 Thread Ned Ludd
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 15:15 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:34:37 -0400 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | Creation of a new categories is fine. pkg moves are bad. | See the countless other posting on this subject of why pkg | moves are bad. Uh, as far as I recall

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New category: net-voip

2006-07-18 Thread Ned Ludd
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 15:51 +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote: Ned Ludd wrote: Creation of a new categories is fine. pkg moves are bad. See the countless other posting on this subject of why pkg moves are bad. yeah new packages is my primary concern. Any objections, problems with the plan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making procfs mount as nosuid,noexec by default

2006-07-15 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 13:41 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: On Sat, 2006-07-15 at 17:45 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: Hi, The local root exploit-of-the-week would have been unable to run if our users systems had /proc mounted with nosuid and/or noexec It would be worthwhile considering making

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New emerge --mindeps option for exclusion of build time dependencies (bug #132355)

2006-07-12 Thread Ned Ludd
+FI7IQsoQCg8o6M UW+dnXPwMe/tIje1A4RYqRs= =9uIv -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dying on some CFLAGS instead of filtering them.

2006-07-10 Thread Ned Ludd
pkg cflags are here already it would fall under the per pkg env variables. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags)

2006-07-08 Thread Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 15:18 -0500, Tushar Teredesai wrote: On 7/7/06, Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You want a pure 100% vanilla(POS) non working toolchain then go download it and compile it yourself. You will soon see why things exist the way they do.. LFS http

Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags)

2006-07-08 Thread Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 23:09 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 03:57:51PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 20:40 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: Keep pushing this and the only thing you will end up

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Adding CPUFLAGS USE_EXPAND variable to the profiles

2006-07-07 Thread Ned Ludd
most. Danny -- Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags)

2006-07-07 Thread Ned Ludd
.. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: Gentoo vs GNU toolchain (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags)

2006-07-07 Thread Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2006-07-07 at 20:40 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 01:55:03PM -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: Keep pushing this and the only thing you will end up with is the vanilla flag being removed all together.. Is that a threat? If not, is there a reason behind this? Yes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags

2006-07-06 Thread Ned Ludd
the same as the x86 flags. There's probably some USE_EXPAND trickery that can be used here... CPU_FEATURE_X86=mmx sse - cpu_feature_x86_mmx etc might be cleaner? I tend to agree this might be a cleaner approach vs having to edit redit CFLAGS all over the place. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags

2006-07-06 Thread Ned Ludd
PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT= and the attachment as an example which solves this exact problem. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux export PORTDIR=$(portageq envvar PORTDIR) export ROOT=/dev/shm/blah export PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT=${ROOT} PROFILES=$(grep ^[a-z,0-9] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/profiles.desc | awk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Replacing cpu-feature USE flags

2006-07-06 Thread Ned Ludd
uses the GNU Toolchain. -- Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

  1   2   3   >