Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
On Dec 26, 2007 1:19 AM, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - app-text/antiword I can take this to complete my anti-office collection. -- Duy -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Aggelos Orfanakos (agorf)
On 4/20/07, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's my pleasure to introduce to you Aggelos Orfanakos (also known as agorf on IRC), our latest addition joining the Ruby herd and the GWN translators (he has already worked on the Greek GWN translations for quite some time). Welcome! Ruby herd has lots of bugs just for you ;) -- Duy -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New metastructure proposal
On 4/11/07, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 22:50 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > it's just so easy to step on other > ppls feet these days ;) I tend to agree that this is a problem, but only insofar as we've become too territorial. Many times I see bugs filed with seemingly minor changes being asked for. A good example is bug #173884 which is a completely valid request. The change is simple, removing "insinto /etc/env.d ; doins $somefile" and replacing it with "doenvd $somefile" instead. Now, this is something that *anyone* with commit access should feel comfortable doing to *anyone's* packages without fear of being attacked for touching someone else's packages. I wish we could have a list stating which package you have to contact its maintainer first (and the reason why if possible), or add tag in metadata.xml to warn people. The rest of the tree will be free land (unless you break the tree of course) -- Duy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2006-12-24 23:59 UTC
On 12/26/06, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Robin H. Johnson wrote: > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed > from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-24 23h59 UTC. rubygfe is both sections. Is this normal? It was mis-added to dev-ruby and then moved to games-misc. So I guess it's ok. Rémi -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- Duy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal for cleaning portage a bit (themes and other eyecandy stuff)
On 8/21/06, Jose Alberto Suarez Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: A normal user doesn't install 50 themes, install maybe 5 themes? about 100kb per theme? 500kb of waste space per user, not too much, now think how many kb wsate all the themes ebuilds, digest, etc and how much time it take to sync. I still want some system-wide themes (think about lock-down desktop). A g-cpan for themes with a separate theme metadata repository might save some the tree space. -- Duy -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] i18n project
On 6/10/06, Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So, let's rephrase it a bit. The following items represent my view about the i18n team's responsibilities: a) Translation of metadata.xml stuff in our tree (Is there any method to keep them up-to-date when the English text changes? Something like "revision" attribute that gets bumped when the English text gets updated?) Keep only English in metadata.xml. Using tools such as intltool or xml2po to extract strings and let i18n translate/maintain .po files themselves. Generated .mo files will be included in metadata directory when rsycing. Another portage hack to use .mo files in metadata directory instead of plain English if locale variables is not C. But that's just part of the problem. What about strings inside ebuild? -- Bi Cờ Lao -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal?
On 3/28/06, Patrick McLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think git is probably the best choice, I have played with it a little > myself and it is _very_ powerful, it also has a very simple dependency > set (all it's deps are in the Gentoo core system, and are either > available or installed by default on every *NIX I know of). I prefer git too. However has anyone tried git with the current tree? Some practical numbers would be appreciated. -- Bi Cờ Lao -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
