On 06/07/2020 10:48, Xianwen Chen (陈贤文) wrote:
Thank you, Michael and James.
Yes, I plan to submit a nice patch to the Makefile to upstream.
However, I think something is not right on my computer.
I have earlier tried to specify
emake CC="$(tc-getCXX)" prefix="${EPREFIX}/usr"
On 19/04/2020 22:47, Michał Górny wrote:
# Michał Górny (2020-04-19)
# Unmaintained. Stuck on Python 3.6. Last release in 2016.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #718410.
media-video/subliminal
It's an active project. Just not doing releases often. Today 2.1.0 was
released:
On 16/03/2020 14:37, Gerion Entrup wrote:
when I compile LLVM for myself, I also always choose SHARED_LIBS simply
because of RAM usage when linking the libraries. In the past, I was not
able to link the single library on my 16 GB machine (I have not tested
it now and this could be dependent on
On 09/09/2018 14:32, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
My point is that in *most* cases -Werror indeed should be removed,
because upstream rarely can keep up with all possible configure,
*FLAGS, compiler versions and arch combinations. But! In some cases
— especially for security oriented software — this
On 03/04/16 20:34, Michael Palimaka wrote:
Hi,
KDE team intends to stabilise Plasma 5 shortly, so please review the
accompanying news items.
There's many packages that warn me about not having KDE installed when
upgrading to Plasma 5. It's in a quite accusatory tone even:
WARNING! Your
he page you have tried to view (Why Debian returned to FFmpeg) is
currently available to LWN subscribers only.
On 14/07/15 14:12, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
https://lwn.net/Articles/650816/
On Apr 16, 2015 1:51 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org
mailto:yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11
On 23/04/15 23:01, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 05:11:13PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Adding overlays with layman is now extremely slow after the overlays
were moved to anongit.gentoo.org. Cloning anything beginning with
git://anongit.gentoo.org/ is capped at 15KB/s
Adding overlays with layman is now extremely slow after the overlays
were moved to anongit.gentoo.org. Cloning anything beginning with
git://anongit.gentoo.org/ is capped at 15KB/s, sometimes 10KB/s.
This is unworkably slow.
Is this intentional?
On 17/03/15 18:29, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-17, o godz. 16:55:32
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu napisał(a):
Am 17.03.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Michał Górny:
However, some
users may prefer setting ABI_X86 globally to enable 32-bit libraries
in all packages that support building them. This
On 29/03/15 19:24, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 19:14:43
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a):
On 17/03/15 18:29, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-17, o godz. 16:55:32
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu napisał(a):
Am 17.03.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Michał Górny:
However
On 29/03/15 21:00, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
*/* long list of 433 flags
Yeah, just noticed that I can't split the lines.
I then tried to define an array of USE flags in make.conf:
GLOBAL_USE_FLAGS=( ... )
so that I can then use that array in package.use, but for some reason
make.conf
On 29/03/15 20:28, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 19:59:19
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a):
According to emerge --info, ABI_X86 seems to append, not override. In
make.conf:
ABI_X86=32
Then:
$ emerge --info | grep -i abi_x86
You get:
ABI_X86=32 64
On 16/03/15 11:58, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/03/15 10:15, Ben de Groot wrote:
# These projects have been abandoned upstream. Most mplayer2 devs have moved
# on to media-video/mpv, and users are suggested to do the same. We have
#
On 16/03/15 16:27, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 16 March 2015 at 21:54, Юра Цимбалов yura.t...@gmail.com wrote:
That would be great, but it depends on getting newer mpv stable, while
(s)mplayer2 is dead and broken right now.
On 08/03/15 21:35, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:31 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as well
as Qt5. Some have +qt4 qt5 in IUSE, others have qt4 qt5.
Is there a guideline for this somewhere? If a package needs
Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as well
as Qt5. Some have +qt4 qt5 in IUSE, others have qt4 qt5.
Is there a guideline for this somewhere? If a package needs Qt and thus
lists:
REQUIRED_USE=^^ ( qt4 qt5 )
but otherwise doesn't prefer one version over the
Btw, what is the appropriate place to discuss vmware overlay related issues?
On 13/02/15 00:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
* sorting out the screwed-up bundled library situation
VMware seems to bundle everything they need. Currently, revdep-rebuild
triggers false positives for a library that is no longer in portage
(libgtop-2.0.so.7 from gnome-base/libgtop-2.28.5; it
On 15/02/15 20:20, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 15. Februar 2015, 18:29:25 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
Btw, what is the appropriate place to discuss vmware overlay related
issues?
Best is probably #gentoo-virtualization on freenode.
Any non-realtime place?
On 13/02/15 00:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
We have an overlay that can be used and is used for user contributions.
Any plans to move it to github so we can fork and send pull requests?
On 14/02/15 20:30, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 15:38:12 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras:
On 13/02/15 00:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
We have an overlay that can be used and is used for user contributions.
Any plans to move it to github so we can fork and send pull
In bug 524074 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524074), Joshua
Kinard mentioned that Gentoo cannot support systems where PAM isn't
installed. I'd like to know whether this is true or not, especially
since no part of the system seems to actually require it. It is there if
you need it. I
On 05/10/14 16:20, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Please get upstream to apply the patch and release a new sudo version.
Simple as this: -pam is not by default tested and you keep the pieces if
it breaks. If you can get upstream to just apply that patch, you solve
your problem. Insulting developers
On 09/09/13 13:05, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-09-09, o godz. 12:50:03
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 09/09/13 12:24, Michał Górny wrote:
1. how to properly disable completions the 'new way'?
something like
Now that Gentoo is much better in handling multilib libraries, but
Gentoo is source-based, there's the question of which header files are
used between different ABI builds.
As I understand it, only the headers from the default ABI are installed.
That means that building for abi_x86_32 on a
On 22/08/13 11:16, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2013-08-22, o godz. 10:56:10
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a):
Now that Gentoo is much better in handling multilib libraries, but
Gentoo is source-based, there's the question of which header files are
used between different ABI builds
On 13/08/13 08:21, heroxbd wrote:
Dear Fellows,
Canonical is raising money by pushing their concept of Ubuntu for
Android[1][2]. The idea is to put GNU environment (esp. Ubuntu userland)
in parallel to Android to drive the external HDMI output with X11
protocal, so that desktop applications can
On 27/05/13 18:06, Michael Palimaka wrote:
Hi all,
Qt 5 has been available for some time, and we are making preparations to
move it to the tree. As we will be supporting user choice where packages
can be build against both Qt 4 and Qt 5, we will require a new global
USE flag:
qt5 - Adds
On 25/03/13 21:01, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 25 March 2013 17:12, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/03/13 23:12, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Mar 24, 2013 8:51 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote:
In the end it's another program that will end
On 25/03/13 08:40, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
On 2013-03-25, Rafael Goncalves Martins rafaelmart...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2013)
# Fails with automake-1.12 (#424289)
#
On 24/03/13 23:12, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Mar 24, 2013 8:51 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/03/13 22:25, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org mailto:hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
And what
On 24/03/13 12:01, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Mar 24, 2013 1:19 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24/03/13 02:12, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 24 March 2013 00:02, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com
mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/03/13 01:15
On 24/03/13 22:25, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same
discussion again?
Can't this be restated as Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it
could have bugs in the
On 23/03/13 01:15, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2013)
# Fails with automake-1.12 (#424289)
# Problems with the alsa patches (#403389)
# Herd has not interest in it and needs a maintainer
# Removal in a month
On 24/03/13 02:12, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 24 March 2013 00:02, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23/03/13 01:15, Markos Chandras wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2013)
# Fails with automake-1.12 (#424289
On 03/03/13 09:11, Alec Warner wrote:
[...] My understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver
Gentoo team only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream)
support. The Kernels 3.4 are not supported by upstream, so they
are also not supported in Gentoo. [...] There is a fear as
On 17/01/13 15:57, Ben de Groot wrote:
Presently we already have a good number of split qt-* library packages
in x11-libs. With the arrival of Qt5 upstream has gone a lot further
in modularization, so we expect the number of packages to grow much
more. We, the Gentoo Qt team, are of the opinion
On 20/01/13 10:39, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 20 January 2013 15:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a user with a suggestion here. Since portage already has kde-base and
kde-misc, why not qt-base and qt-misc (and qt-something is the need arises.)
Qt5 will have standard core modules
On 15/12/12 06:16, Peter Stuge wrote:
Richard Yao wrote:
Where is development now?
We have rewritten the build system and restored support for older
kernels and verified compatibility as far back as Linux 2.6.31. We have
tagged 1_beta1 and eudev is in the portage tree. A few lingering
On 18/08/12 18:42, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 18 August 2012 02:01:12 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use
1.50 is purely the boost's maintainers
On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in
the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure that they have the
proper slot. Otherwise your package may pull in Qt5 while it may not
in fact support it.
This can be trouble if the
On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
So what would be the methodology of making sure a package has the proper
slot?
Obviously you would need
On 28/07/12 12:27, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted
for qt4 and qt5 useflags as the most straightforward and least
confusing.
Indeed, the flag qt has almost
On 14/05/12 23:42, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
I personally think that if an upstream says that no warnings must be
produced by the code, and a developer should look at them before
declaring any warnings safe, then that is best followed.
Upstream does not need to take into account
On 27/04/12 17:15, Duncan wrote:
Zac Medico posted on Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:41:21 -0700 as excerpted:
Having the package manager interact with an eclass function like
epatch_user is ugly, and it's unnecessary since we can pull all of the
pieces into the package manager in EAPI 5. Any eclasses
On 23/08/11 00:20, Vikraman wrote:
Hi all,
Gentoostats[0] is a GSoC 2011 project to collect package statistics from gentoo
machines. Please check it out. Bug reports and feature suggestions are welcome.
To submit your stats, use the app-portage/gentoostats ebuild from betagarden
overlay[1].
On 27/04/12 20:38, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Amadeusz Żołnowskiaide...@gentoo.org wrote:
And this is probably the case when user has to accept a license on the
website. This is URL for zip archive of yEd-3.9.1:
On 22/02/12 00:38, Alec Warner wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Pacho Ramospa...@gentoo.org wrote:
As looks like fixing old grub is far away because nobody know what is
causing that issues, probably trying to get grub-1.99 ready for
stabilization would be interesting (we will need to do
On 09/24/2011 08:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2011 17:44:50 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2
packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those
revisions with a patch that alters macro
On 09/24/2011 10:07 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 02:43, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 09/24/2011 08:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the defines in question are internal to zlib. packages relying on them
are broken, plain and simple.
Then fix *them*, not zlib
I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2
packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those
revisions with a patch that alters macro identifiers, making Gentoo's
zlib incompatible with upstream. As a result, a lot of packages stopped
building.
On 09/24/2011 02:10 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2
packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those
revisions with a patch that alters
On 09/24/2011 02:40 AM, Alec Warner wrote:
This was just another episode of Vapier's hostile and arrogant behavior
towards users. Every time someone comes up with a valid argument of why
he's wrong, the final answer is don't care, I do what I please because I'm
the dev and you're not. So my
On 09/24/2011 03:23 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
[...] Right now, zlib does the
exact opposite of what should be done; Vapier changed zlib, and tries to
fix the packages that break because of that change. The correct way to
handle it is to let zlib be, and fix the packages that stopped working
with
Can users file stable and keyword requests?
On 08/24/2011 01:48 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
[...]
If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get
pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will
meet some rather unpleasant resistance :)
emerge always asks me after a world update whether I want to
On 06/26/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
Yesterday, I upgraded 'xorg-drivers' to the latest stable 1.10
then found upon rebooting that X failed to recognise the keyboard.
Yes, it's happened before I was not surprised:
I had to switch the machine off, reboot, login as root
-- experience long
On 06/26/2011 09:25 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
110626 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/26/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Webb wrote:
Yesterday, I upgraded 'xorg-drivers' to the latest stable 1.10
then found upon rebooting that X failed to recognise the keyboard.
Yes, it's happened before I
On 06/25/2011 12:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
git-2.eclass is in the tree for a while now, and there's still awful
lot of packages using old deprecated git.eclass.
I think I remember seeing deprecation warnings in the past when an
ebuild was using a deprecated eclass (right at the
Why did the bump to Qt 4.7.3 happen? AFAIK, it only contains Symbian
changes, and Gentoo does not run on the Symbian platform.
On 05/11/2011 02:11 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:05:16PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Why did the bump to Qt 4.7.3 happen? AFAIK, it only contains Symbian
changes, and Gentoo does not run on the Symbian platform.
Sorry wrong link
http://qt.nokia.com/developer
On 05/11/2011 03:32 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 11.5.2011 13:05, Nikos Chantziaras napsal(a):
Why did the bump to Qt 4.7.3 happen? AFAIK, it only contains Symbian
changes, and Gentoo does not run on the Symbian platform.
With this approach you
On 03/29/2011 08:00 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM, justinj...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
the descriptions of USE flags should explain what the USE is good for.
In my opinion some thing like
Enables foo intergration
or
Enables support for foo
if it isn't totally clear
On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexanderwi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5.
Clearly your definition of modern doesn't include my server... :)
Just
On 03/05/2011 12:00 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexanderwi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an
hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5.
Clearly your definition
On 02/28/2011 08:18 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
libjpeg-turbo-1.1.0 final is out and in tree now, and everything in tree
has been tested against it working.
Unless any objections, i'll commit this minor change so ~arch users will
get it by default now:
[...]
While you're at it, could you
On 02/13/2011 01:21 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday, February 11, 2011 11:49:43 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/11/2011 06:38 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
4) What have we learned from libpng 1.2 - 1.4 upgrade? I'd just like to
be better informed.
[...]
We have been discussing about
On 02/02/2011 10:30 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze:
It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 because
it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it would be
beneficial for people if they wouldn't have to wait for arches
On 02/02/2011 11:01 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Hi,
Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de:
On 02/02/2011 10:30 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze:
It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64
because it's waiting for ppc and ppc64
It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 because
it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it would be
beneficial for people if they wouldn't have to wait for arches that
don't affect them at all.
It seems better if the packages can be unmasked for x86 and amd64
On 01/29/2011 07:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I would like to know what is blocking this from landing main tree in
the near future, as I reviewed:
http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg41737.html
and looks like there wasn't major problems (at least commented in this
thread)
On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM,
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
wrote:
There is a font for coders called Rail Model, please include it with Linux
distributions:
On 11/23/2010 09:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote:
Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org writes:
well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the
masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at
that
On 11/21/2010 08:49 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:54:19 +0200
Alex Alexanderwi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:47:57AM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300
Alistair Bushali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain
On 11/21/2010 12:46 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm unmasking sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1 tomorrow. I'd like to recommend everyone
who has already unmasked it to rebuild it now as there has been some important
patches added recently (see ChangeLog).
revbump?
On 11/21/2010 04:57 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:38:23 +0200
Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 11/21/2010 12:46 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
I'm unmasking sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1 tomorrow. I'd like to recommend everyone
who has already unmasked it to rebuild it now as there has
On 11/15/2010 01:30 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto:
I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of
fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary.
Oh the heck are they implemented? If they
I've updated to dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0a today, and it tells me:
Old versions of installed libraries were detected on your system.
In order to avoid breaking packages that depend on these old libs,
the libraries are not being removed. You need to run revdep-rebuild
in order to remove these old
On 07/04/2010 05:29 PM, Lars Wendler wrote:
Hi list,
now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be
honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becoming
stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that openrc has no
upstream
On 07/01/2010 11:00 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
[...]
The way to control compiler flags in Gentoo is CFLAGS.
That is true. However, there's a problem; you can control package
options of individual packages with USE flags, but you can't control
compilation switches of individual packages with
On 06/28/2010 10:51 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:44:54 +0300
Samuli Suominenssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
You've forgotten make --as-needed not break correct code by making
the linker ignore explicit instructions from a program author to
link two things together. Until you
On 06/27/2010 01:47 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de schrieb:
Did it actually occur to anyone that warnings are not errors? You can
have them for correct code. A warning means you might want to look at
the code to check whether there's some real error there. It
On 06/27/2010 03:23 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 02:56:33PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/27/2010 01:47 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de schrieb:
Did it actually occur to anyone that warnings are not errors?
You can have them
On 06/27/2010 08:14 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 05:46:28PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 06/27/2010 03:23 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote:
The compiler is not totally free to ignore the register keyword.
Both the C and the C++ standards require that the compiler complain
On 06/27/2010 09:10 PM, dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
...
It is allowed. Section 7.1.1, Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the C++ standard:
...
Not in C.
ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (aka C99), section 6.7.1, note 101:
The implementation may treat any
On 06/26/2010 10:39 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Petteri Rätybetelge...@gentoo.org schrieb:
There should be useful stuff here:
http://video.fosdem.org/2010/devrooms/distributions/How_to_be_a_good_upstream.ogv
[...[
#2 One point i don't agree is the dont add -Werror rule. actually,
i'm
On 06/26/2010 11:12 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:57:33 +0200
Enrico Weigeltweig...@metux.de wrote:
Uhm. No. Certain compilers will give you warnings for f(g(a), g(b))
if you -Wall.
Warn on what exactly ?
That f's arguments are evaluated in an unspecified order.
Which
On 06/16/2010 08:43 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:33:27 +0200
Sebastian Pippingsp...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tone is currently not a strength of Gentoo.
As I have heard there are people not joining Gentoo because the
atmosphere in Gentoo is lacking respect and empathy.
That's
On 06/16/2010 09:18 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
On 06/16/2010 08:43 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:33:27 +0200
Sebastian Pippingsp...@gentoo.orgwrote:
Tone is currently not a strength of Gentoo.
As I
There are two eclasses for Qt: qt4.eclass and qt4-r2.eclass
Which one should I inherit?
On 04/19/2010 12:32 AM, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
On Monday 19 April 2010 00:10:15 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
There are two eclasses for Qt: qt4.eclass and qt4-r2.eclass
Which one should I inherit?
We have a guide for writing Qt4 ebuilds
Tom and Theo,
Yep, I should have RTFM'ed more :P
On 03/17/2010 03:38 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
Hello all,
I am not sure if this is the best list to ask, but I will ask here since
it's related to development and cross compilation.
I have setup a 32 bit chroot environment to be able to cross develop for
windows. I followed this guide:
On 03/25/2010 07:43 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 25 March 2010 12:57:21 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 03/17/2010 03:38 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
I am not sure if this is the best list to ask, but I will ask here since
it's related to development and cross compilation.
I have setup
On 03/19/2010 08:26 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
You guys always make easy decisions so complicated. :P
Masking a package is not complicated.
Yes, that's why all the heated debates about Python 3 exist, because
it's all so
On 03/19/2010 10:57 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:54:28 -0500
Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:17:17 +0100
Ben de Grootyng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Because it is extremely useless to the great majority of users.
Most packages
On 02/25/2010 02:44 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:45:31PM +0100, Hanno Böck wrote:
Just noticed yesterday an issue with the upgrade documentation in the news
regarding mysql 5.1 and revdep-rebuild.
It suggests running
# revdep-rebuild --library libmysqlclient.so.15
but
On 02/16/2010 12:12 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:51:59PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 02/15/2010 11:21 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
This is my last blocker for getting MySQL 5.1 series into ~arch status.
itle: MySQL 5.1 unmasking
Author: Robin H
On 02/15/2010 11:21 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
This is my last blocker for getting MySQL 5.1 series into ~arch status.
itle: MySQL 5.1 unmasking
Author: Robin H. Johnsonrobb...@gentoo.rog
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2010-02-15
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only have
gtk, qt and the like. This should be declared absolutely wrong,
IMHO. When a program provides a command-line tool and a GUI tool, and
On 02/08/2010 01:36 PM, AllenJB wrote:
On 08/02/10 11:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only have
gtk, qt and the like. This should be declared
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
