[gentoo-dev] Re: How to set CXX compiler?

2020-07-06 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/07/2020 10:48, Xianwen Chen (陈贤文) wrote: Thank you, Michael and James. Yes, I plan to submit a nice patch to the Makefile to upstream. However, I think something is not right on my computer. I have earlier tried to specify   emake CC="$(tc-getCXX)" prefix="${EPREFIX}/usr"

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-video/subliminal

2020-05-02 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 19/04/2020 22:47, Michał Górny wrote: # Michał Górny (2020-04-19) # Unmaintained. Stuck on Python 3.6. Last release in 2016. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #718410. media-video/subliminal It's an active project. Just not doing releases often. Today 2.1.0 was released:

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packaging changes in LLVM 10

2020-03-16 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 16/03/2020 14:37, Gerion Entrup wrote: when I compile LLVM for myself, I also always choose SHARED_LIBS simply because of RAM usage when linking the libraries. In the past, I was not able to link the single library on my 16 GB machine (I have not tested it now and this could be dependent on

[gentoo-dev] Re: Changing policy about -Werror

2018-09-13 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/09/2018 14:32, Andrew Savchenko wrote: My point is that in *most* cases -Werror indeed should be removed, because upstream rarely can keep up with all possible configure, *FLAGS, compiler versions and arch combinations. But! In some cases — especially for security oriented software — this

[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: upgrading to Plasma 5

2016-04-07 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 03/04/16 20:34, Michael Palimaka wrote: Hi, KDE team intends to stabilise Plasma 5 shortly, so please review the accompanying news items. There's many packages that warn me about not having KDE installed when upgrading to Plasma 5. It's in a quite accusatory tone even: WARNING! Your

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC News item: FFmpeg default

2015-07-14 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
he page you have tried to view (Why Debian returned to FFmpeg) is currently available to LWN subscribers only. On 14/07/15 14:12, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: https://lwn.net/Articles/650816/ On Apr 16, 2015 1:51 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org mailto:yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 11

[gentoo-dev] Re: git://anongit.gentoo.org is extremely slow

2015-04-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/04/15 23:01, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 05:11:13PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Adding overlays with layman is now extremely slow after the overlays were moved to anongit.gentoo.org. Cloning anything beginning with git://anongit.gentoo.org/ is capped at 15KB/s

[gentoo-dev] git://anongit.gentoo.org is extremely slow

2015-04-22 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Adding overlays with layman is now extremely slow after the overlays were moved to anongit.gentoo.org. Cloning anything beginning with git://anongit.gentoo.org/ is capped at 15KB/s, sometimes 10KB/s. This is unworkably slow. Is this intentional?

[gentoo-dev] Re: multilib amd64 news item for review

2015-03-29 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 17/03/15 18:29, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2015-03-17, o godz. 16:55:32 René Neumann li...@necoro.eu napisał(a): Am 17.03.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Michał Górny: However, some users may prefer setting ABI_X86 globally to enable 32-bit libraries in all packages that support building them. This

[gentoo-dev] Re: multilib amd64 news item for review

2015-03-29 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 29/03/15 19:24, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 19:14:43 Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a): On 17/03/15 18:29, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2015-03-17, o godz. 16:55:32 René Neumann li...@necoro.eu napisał(a): Am 17.03.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Michał Górny: However

[gentoo-dev] Re: multilib amd64 news item for review

2015-03-29 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 29/03/15 21:00, Andrew Savchenko wrote: */* long list of 433 flags Yeah, just noticed that I can't split the lines. I then tried to define an array of USE flags in make.conf: GLOBAL_USE_FLAGS=( ... ) so that I can then use that array in package.use, but for some reason make.conf

[gentoo-dev] Re: multilib amd64 news item for review

2015-03-29 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 29/03/15 20:28, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 19:59:19 Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a): According to emerge --info, ABI_X86 seems to append, not override. In make.conf: ABI_X86=32 Then: $ emerge --info | grep -i abi_x86 You get: ABI_X86=32 64

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: media-video/mplayer2 media-video/smplayer2

2015-03-16 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 16/03/15 11:58, Alexander Berntsen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 15/03/15 10:15, Ben de Groot wrote: # These projects have been abandoned upstream. Most mplayer2 devs have moved # on to media-video/mpv, and users are suggested to do the same. We have #

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: media-video/mplayer2 media-video/smplayer2

2015-03-16 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 16/03/15 16:27, Rich Freeman wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 16 March 2015 at 21:54, Юра Цимбалов yura.t...@gmail.com wrote: That would be great, but it depends on getting newer mpv stable, while (s)mplayer2 is dead and broken right now.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Should there be a preference with qt4 and qt5 USE flags?

2015-03-08 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 08/03/15 21:35, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 21:31 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as well as Qt5. Some have +qt4 qt5 in IUSE, others have qt4 qt5. Is there a guideline for this somewhere? If a package needs

[gentoo-dev] Should there be a preference with qt4 and qt5 USE flags?

2015-03-08 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Some ebuilds in portage for Qt-based software support both Qt4 as well as Qt5. Some have +qt4 qt5 in IUSE, others have qt4 qt5. Is there a guideline for this somewhere? If a package needs Qt and thus lists: REQUIRED_USE=^^ ( qt4 qt5 ) but otherwise doesn't prefer one version over the

[gentoo-dev] Re: vmware team needs help

2015-02-15 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Btw, what is the appropriate place to discuss vmware overlay related issues?

[gentoo-dev] Re: vmware team needs help

2015-02-15 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 13/02/15 00:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: * sorting out the screwed-up bundled library situation VMware seems to bundle everything they need. Currently, revdep-rebuild triggers false positives for a library that is no longer in portage (libgtop-2.0.so.7 from gnome-base/libgtop-2.28.5; it

[gentoo-dev] Re: vmware team needs help

2015-02-15 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 15/02/15 20:20, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Sonntag, 15. Februar 2015, 18:29:25 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: Btw, what is the appropriate place to discuss vmware overlay related issues? Best is probably #gentoo-virtualization on freenode. Any non-realtime place?

[gentoo-dev] Re: vmware team needs help

2015-02-14 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 13/02/15 00:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: We have an overlay that can be used and is used for user contributions. Any plans to move it to github so we can fork and send pull requests?

[gentoo-dev] Re: vmware team needs help

2015-02-14 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 14/02/15 20:30, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2015, 15:38:12 schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: On 13/02/15 00:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: We have an overlay that can be used and is used for user contributions. Any plans to move it to github so we can fork and send pull

[gentoo-dev] Are users forced to use PAM?

2014-10-05 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
In bug 524074 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524074), Joshua Kinard mentioned that Gentoo cannot support systems where PAM isn't installed. I'd like to know whether this is true or not, especially since no part of the system seems to actually require it. It is there if you need it. I

[gentoo-dev] Re: Are users forced to use PAM?

2014-10-05 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 05/10/14 16:20, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Please get upstream to apply the patch and release a new sudo version. Simple as this: -pam is not by default tested and you keep the pieces if it breaks. If you can get upstream to just apply that patch, you solve your problem. Insulting developers

[gentoo-dev] Re: bash-completion-2.1-r1

2013-09-09 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/09/13 13:05, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2013-09-09, o godz. 12:50:03 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On 09/09/13 12:24, Michał Górny wrote: 1. how to properly disable completions the 'new way'? something like

[gentoo-dev] Header files and ABI_X86

2013-08-22 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Now that Gentoo is much better in handling multilib libraries, but Gentoo is source-based, there's the question of which header files are used between different ABI builds. As I understand it, only the headers from the default ABI are installed. That means that building for abi_x86_32 on a

[gentoo-dev] Re: Header files and ABI_X86

2013-08-22 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 22/08/13 11:16, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2013-08-22, o godz. 10:56:10 Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a): Now that Gentoo is much better in handling multilib libraries, but Gentoo is source-based, there's the question of which header files are used between different ABI builds

[gentoo-dev] Re: desktop experience on smartphone: thoughts and plans against Ubuntu edge

2013-08-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 13/08/13 08:21, heroxbd wrote: Dear Fellows, Canonical is raising money by pushing their concept of Ubuntu for Android[1][2]. The idea is to put GNU environment (esp. Ubuntu userland) in parallel to Android to drive the external HDMI output with X11 protocal, so that desktop applications can

[gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: qt5

2013-05-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 27/05/13 18:06, Michael Palimaka wrote: Hi all, Qt 5 has been available for some time, and we are making preparations to move it to the tree. As we will be supporting user choice where packages can be build against both Qt 4 and Qt 5, we will require a new global USE flag: qt5 - Adds

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime

2013-03-26 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 25/03/13 21:01, Markos Chandras wrote: On 25 March 2013 17:12, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote: On 24/03/13 23:12, Markos Chandras wrote: On Mar 24, 2013 8:51 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote: In the end it's another program that will end

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime

2013-03-26 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 25/03/13 08:40, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote: On 2013-03-25, Rafael Goncalves Martins rafaelmart...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: # Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2013) # Fails with automake-1.12 (#424289) #

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime

2013-03-25 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 24/03/13 23:12, Markos Chandras wrote: On Mar 24, 2013 8:51 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote: On 24/03/13 22:25, Matt Turner wrote: On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org mailto:hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: And what

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime

2013-03-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 24/03/13 12:01, Markos Chandras wrote: On Mar 24, 2013 1:19 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote: On 24/03/13 02:12, Markos Chandras wrote: On 24 March 2013 00:02, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com mailto:rea...@gmail.com wrote: On 23/03/13 01:15

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime

2013-03-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 24/03/13 22:25, Matt Turner wrote: On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same discussion again? Can't this be restated as Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it could have bugs in the

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime

2013-03-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/03/13 01:15, Markos Chandras wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2013) # Fails with automake-1.12 (#424289) # Problems with the alsa patches (#403389) # Herd has not interest in it and needs a maintainer # Removal in a month

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime

2013-03-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 24/03/13 02:12, Markos Chandras wrote: On 24 March 2013 00:02, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote: On 23/03/13 01:15, Markos Chandras wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (22 Mar 2013) # Fails with automake-1.12 (#424289

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers: nvidia-drivers-313.18.ebuild ChangeLog

2013-03-03 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 03/03/13 09:11, Alec Warner wrote: [...] My understanding of the summary is that the nvidia-driver Gentoo team only supports kernels that nvidia themselves (upstream) support. The Kernels 3.4 are not supported by upstream, so they are also not supported in Gentoo. [...] There is a fear as

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new qt category

2013-01-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 17/01/13 15:57, Ben de Groot wrote: Presently we already have a good number of split qt-* library packages in x11-libs. With the arrival of Qt5 upstream has gone a lot further in modularization, so we expect the number of packages to grow much more. We, the Gentoo Qt team, are of the opinion

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: new qt category

2013-01-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 20/01/13 10:39, Ben de Groot wrote: On 20 January 2013 15:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote: Just a user with a suggestion here. Since portage already has kde-base and kde-misc, why not qt-base and qt-misc (and qt-something is the need arises.) Qt5 will have standard core modules

[gentoo-dev] Re: eudev project announcement

2012-12-14 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 15/12/12 06:16, Peter Stuge wrote: Richard Yao wrote: Where is development now? We have rewritten the build system and restored support for older kernels and verified compatibility as far back as Linux 2.6.31. We have tagged 1_beta1 and eudev is in the portage tree. A few lingering

[gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.16 moving to ~arch

2012-08-18 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 18/08/12 18:42, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday 18 August 2012 02:01:12 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: there's a trivial patch needed to make 1.49 work. forcing people to use 1.50 is purely the boost's maintainers

[gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5

2012-07-28 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote: In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure that they have the proper slot. Otherwise your package may pull in Qt5 while it may not in fact support it. This can be trouble if the

[gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5

2012-07-28 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote: [...] So what would be the methodology of making sure a package has the proper slot? Obviously you would need

[gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5

2012-07-28 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 28/07/12 12:27, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted for qt4 and qt5 useflags as the most straightforward and least confusing. Indeed, the flag qt has almost

[gentoo-dev] Re: -Werror unwanted?

2012-05-14 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 14/05/12 23:42, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: I personally think that if an upstream says that no warnings must be produced by the code, and a developer should look at them before declaring any warnings safe, then that is best followed. Upstream does not need to take into account

[gentoo-dev] Re: Making user patches globally available

2012-04-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 27/04/12 17:15, Duncan wrote: Zac Medico posted on Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:41:21 -0700 as excerpted: Having the package manager interact with an eclass function like epatch_user is ugly, and it's unnecessary since we can pull all of the pieces into the package manager in EAPI 5. Any eclasses

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoostats, SoC 2011

2012-04-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/08/11 00:20, Vikraman wrote: Hi all, Gentoostats[0] is a GSoC 2011 project to collect package statistics from gentoo machines. Please check it out. Bug reports and feature suggestions are welcome. To submit your stats, use the app-portage/gentoostats ebuild from betagarden overlay[1].

[gentoo-dev] Re: New license: yEd Software License Agreement

2012-04-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 27/04/12 20:38, Rich Freeman wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Amadeusz Żołnowskiaide...@gentoo.org wrote: And this is probably the case when user has to accept a license on the website. This is URL for zip archive of yEd-3.9.1:

[gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking

2012-02-21 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 22/02/12 00:38, Alec Warner wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 1:26 AM, Pacho Ramospa...@gentoo.org wrote: As looks like fixing old grub is far away because nobody know what is causing that issues, probably trying to get grub-1.99 ready for stabilization would be interesting (we will need to do

[gentoo-dev] Re: zlib breakage

2011-09-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/24/2011 08:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday, September 23, 2011 17:44:50 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2 packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those revisions with a patch that alters macro

[gentoo-dev] Re: zlib breakage

2011-09-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/24/2011 10:07 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 02:43, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/24/2011 08:24 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: the defines in question are internal to zlib. packages relying on them are broken, plain and simple. Then fix *them*, not zlib

[gentoo-dev] zlib breakage

2011-09-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2 packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those revisions with a patch that alters macro identifiers, making Gentoo's zlib incompatible with upstream. As a result, a lot of packages stopped building.

[gentoo-dev] Re: zlib breakage

2011-09-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/24/2011 02:10 AM, Matt Turner wrote: On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote: I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2 packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those revisions with a patch that alters

[gentoo-dev] Re: zlib breakage

2011-09-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/24/2011 02:40 AM, Alec Warner wrote: This was just another episode of Vapier's hostile and arrogant behavior towards users. Every time someone comes up with a valid argument of why he's wrong, the final answer is don't care, I do what I please because I'm the dev and you're not. So my

[gentoo-dev] Re: zlib breakage

2011-09-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 09/24/2011 03:23 AM, Brian Harring wrote: [...] Right now, zlib does the exact opposite of what should be done; Vapier changed zlib, and tries to fix the packages that break because of that change. The correct way to handle it is to let zlib be, and fix the packages that stopped working with

[gentoo-dev] Stable and keyword requests by users

2011-08-31 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Can users file stable and keyword requests?

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoostats, SoC 2011

2011-08-25 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 08/24/2011 01:48 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: [...] If you sneakily add something to cron.daily by default you can get pretty nice coverage. But I guess anyone trying that in Gentooland will meet some rather unpleasant resistance :) emerge always asks me after a world update whether I want to

[gentoo-dev] Re: a virtual advantage ?

2011-06-26 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/26/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Webb wrote: Yesterday, I upgraded 'xorg-drivers' to the latest stable 1.10 then found upon rebooting that X failed to recognise the keyboard. Yes, it's happened before I was not surprised: I had to switch the machine off, reboot, login as root -- experience long

[gentoo-dev] Re: a virtual advantage ?

2011-06-26 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/26/2011 09:25 PM, Philip Webb wrote: 110626 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 06/26/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Webb wrote: Yesterday, I upgraded 'xorg-drivers' to the latest stable 1.10 then found upon rebooting that X failed to recognise the keyboard. Yes, it's happened before I

[gentoo-dev] Re: Please migrate to git-2.eclass

2011-06-25 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/25/2011 12:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote: Hello, git-2.eclass is in the tree for a while now, and there's still awful lot of packages using old deprecated git.eclass. I think I remember seeing deprecation warnings in the past when an ebuild was using a deprecated eclass (right at the

[gentoo-dev] About the Qt 4.7.3 bump

2011-05-11 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Why did the bump to Qt 4.7.3 happen? AFAIK, it only contains Symbian changes, and Gentoo does not run on the Symbian platform.

[gentoo-dev] Re: About the Qt 4.7.3 bump

2011-05-11 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 05/11/2011 02:11 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:05:16PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Why did the bump to Qt 4.7.3 happen? AFAIK, it only contains Symbian changes, and Gentoo does not run on the Symbian platform. Sorry wrong link http://qt.nokia.com/developer

[gentoo-dev] Re: About the Qt 4.7.3 bump

2011-05-11 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 05/11/2011 03:32 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 11.5.2011 13:05, Nikos Chantziaras napsal(a): Why did the bump to Qt 4.7.3 happen? AFAIK, it only contains Symbian changes, and Gentoo does not run on the Symbian platform. With this approach you

[gentoo-dev] Re: Please enhance your USE descriptions!

2011-03-29 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 03/29/2011 08:00 PM, Matt Turner wrote: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:24 PM, justinj...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, the descriptions of USE flags should explain what the USE is good for. In my opinion some thing like Enables foo intergration or Enables support for foo if it isn't totally clear

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: www-client/chromium-bin

2011-03-05 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexanderwi...@gentoo.org wrote: Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5. Clearly your definition of modern doesn't include my server... :) Just

[gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: www-client/chromium-bin

2011-03-05 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 03/05/2011 12:00 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 03/05/2011 04:41 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Alex Alexanderwi...@gentoo.org wrote: Anyway, compilation on a modern system shouldn't take more than an hour. ~15-20 minutes on a quad i5. Clearly your definition

[gentoo-dev] Re: libjpeg-turbo by default for ~arch users

2011-02-28 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 02/28/2011 08:18 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: libjpeg-turbo-1.1.0 final is out and in tree now, and everything in tree has been tested against it working. Unless any objections, i'll commit this minor change so ~arch users will get it by default now: [...] While you're at it, could you

[gentoo-dev] Re: libpng-1.5 smooth upgrade

2011-02-12 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 02/13/2011 01:21 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday, February 11, 2011 11:49:43 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 02/11/2011 06:38 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: 4) What have we learned from libpng 1.2 - 1.4 upgrade? I'd just like to be better informed. [...] We have been discussing about

[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: Portage should not mask packages globally, but only for some arches

2011-02-02 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 02/02/2011 10:30 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote: W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze: It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 because it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it would be beneficial for people if they wouldn't have to wait for arches

[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggestion: Portage should not mask packages globally, but only for some arches

2011-02-02 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 02/02/2011 11:01 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: Hi, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de: On 02/02/2011 10:30 AM, Kacper Kowalik wrote: W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze: It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 because it's waiting for ppc and ppc64

[gentoo-dev] Suggestion: Portage should not mask packages globally, but only for some arches

2011-02-01 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 because it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it would be beneficial for people if they wouldn't have to wait for arches that don't affect them at all. It seems better if the packages can be unmasked for x86 and amd64

[gentoo-dev] Re: MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2011-01-29 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 01/29/2011 07:03 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: I would like to know what is blocking this from landing main tree in the near future, as I reviewed: http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg41737.html and looks like there wasn't major problems (at least commented in this thread)

[gentoo-dev] Re: Rail Model font for coders

2011-01-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 01/20/2011 11:14 AM, hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com wrote: There is a font for coders called Rail Model, please include it with Linux distributions:

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow

2010-11-22 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 11/23/2010 09:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote: Mike Frysingervap...@gentoo.org writes: well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at that

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow

2010-11-21 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 11/21/2010 08:49 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:54:19 +0200 Alex Alexanderwi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 01:47:57AM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300 Alistair Bushali_b...@gentoo.org wrote: We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow

2010-11-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 11/21/2010 12:46 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: I'm unmasking sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1 tomorrow. I'd like to recommend everyone who has already unmasked it to rebuild it now as there has been some important patches added recently (see ChangeLog). revbump?

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.5 unmasking tomorrow

2010-11-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 11/21/2010 04:57 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:38:23 +0200 Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote: On 11/21/2010 12:46 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: I'm unmasking sys-devel/gcc-4.5.1 tomorrow. I'd like to recommend everyone who has already unmasked it to rebuild it now as there has

[gentoo-dev] Re: fat binaries

2010-11-14 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 11/15/2010 01:30 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto: I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary. Oh the heck are they implemented? If they

[gentoo-dev] Should I file three bug reports or just one?

2010-07-14 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
I've updated to dev-libs/openssl-1.0.0a today, and it tells me: Old versions of installed libraries were detected on your system. In order to avoid breaking packages that depend on these old libs, the libraries are not being removed. You need to run revdep-rebuild in order to remove these old

[gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-07-04 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 07/04/2010 05:29 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: Hi list, now that openrc has no active upstram anymore [1] what shall we do? To be honest I was really looking forward for openrc/baselayout-2 finally becoming stable in Gentoo but this seems to be quite implausible now that openrc has no upstream

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] debug USE flag misuse

2010-07-01 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 07/01/2010 11:00 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: [...] The way to control compiler flags in Gentoo is CFLAGS. That is true. However, there's a problem; you can control package options of individual packages with USE flags, but you can't control compilation switches of individual packages with

[gentoo-dev] Re: Adding --as-needed to LDFLAGS in profiles/default/linux/make.defaults

2010-06-28 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/28/2010 10:51 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:44:54 +0300 Samuli Suominenssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: You've forgotten make --as-needed not break correct code by making the linker ignore explicit instructions from a program author to link two things together. Until you

[gentoo-dev] Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages

2010-06-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/27/2010 01:47 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de schrieb: Did it actually occur to anyone that warnings are not errors? You can have them for correct code. A warning means you might want to look at the code to check whether there's some real error there. It

[gentoo-dev] Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages

2010-06-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/27/2010 03:23 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote: On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 02:56:33PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 06/27/2010 01:47 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de schrieb: Did it actually occur to anyone that warnings are not errors? You can have them

[gentoo-dev] Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages

2010-06-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/27/2010 08:14 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote: On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 05:46:28PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 06/27/2010 03:23 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote: The compiler is not totally free to ignore the register keyword. Both the C and the C++ standards require that the compiler complain

[gentoo-dev] Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages

2010-06-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/27/2010 09:10 PM, dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote: On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: ... It is allowed. Section 7.1.1, Paragraphs 2 and 3 of the C++ standard: ... Not in C. ISO/IEC 9899:1999 (aka C99), section 6.7.1, note 101: The implementation may treat any

[gentoo-dev] Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages

2010-06-26 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/26/2010 10:39 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Petteri Rätybetelge...@gentoo.org schrieb: There should be useful stuff here: http://video.fosdem.org/2010/devrooms/distributions/How_to_be_a_good_upstream.ogv [...[ #2 One point i don't agree is the dont add -Werror rule. actually, i'm

[gentoo-dev] Re: FYI: Rules for distro-friendly packages

2010-06-26 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/26/2010 11:12 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:57:33 +0200 Enrico Weigeltweig...@metux.de wrote: Uhm. No. Certain compilers will give you warnings for f(g(a), g(b)) if you -Wall. Warn on what exactly ? That f's arguments are evaluated in an unspecified order. Which

[gentoo-dev] Re: Tone in Gentoo

2010-06-16 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/16/2010 08:43 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:33:27 +0200 Sebastian Pippingsp...@gentoo.org wrote: Tone is currently not a strength of Gentoo. As I have heard there are people not joining Gentoo because the atmosphere in Gentoo is lacking respect and empathy. That's

[gentoo-dev] Re: Tone in Gentoo

2010-06-16 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 06/16/2010 09:18 PM, Alec Warner wrote: On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote: On 06/16/2010 08:43 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 05:33:27 +0200 Sebastian Pippingsp...@gentoo.orgwrote: Tone is currently not a strength of Gentoo. As I

[gentoo-dev] qt4.eclass vs qt4-r2.eclass

2010-04-18 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
There are two eclasses for Qt: qt4.eclass and qt4-r2.eclass Which one should I inherit?

[gentoo-dev] Re: qt4.eclass vs qt4-r2.eclass

2010-04-18 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 04/19/2010 12:32 AM, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: On Monday 19 April 2010 00:10:15 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: There are two eclasses for Qt: qt4.eclass and qt4-r2.eclass Which one should I inherit? We have a guide for writing Qt4 ebuilds Tom and Theo, Yep, I should have RTFM'ed more :P

[gentoo-dev] Re: MinGW for windows - creating dlls

2010-03-25 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 03/17/2010 03:38 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: Hello all, I am not sure if this is the best list to ask, but I will ask here since it's related to development and cross compilation. I have setup a 32 bit chroot environment to be able to cross develop for windows. I followed this guide:

[gentoo-dev] Re: MinGW for windows - creating dlls

2010-03-25 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 03/25/2010 07:43 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 25 March 2010 12:57:21 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 03/17/2010 03:38 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: I am not sure if this is the best list to ask, but I will ask here since it's related to development and cross compilation. I have setup

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages pulling in python-3*, also they dont require it

2010-03-20 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 03/19/2010 08:26 PM, Alec Warner wrote: On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote: You guys always make easy decisions so complicated. :P Masking a package is not complicated. Yes, that's why all the heated debates about Python 3 exist, because it's all so

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages pulling in python-3*, also they dont require it

2010-03-19 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 03/19/2010 10:57 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:54:28 -0500 Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:17:17 +0100 Ben de Grootyng...@gentoo.org wrote: Because it is extremely useless to the great majority of users. Most packages

[gentoo-dev] Re: news regarding mysql 5.1 incomplete

2010-02-24 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 02/25/2010 02:44 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 01:45:31PM +0100, Hanno Böck wrote: Just noticed yesterday an issue with the upgrade documentation in the news regarding mysql 5.1 and revdep-rebuild. It suggests running # revdep-rebuild --library libmysqlclient.so.15 but

[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: MySQL 5.1 bump

2010-02-16 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 02/16/2010 12:12 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:51:59PM +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 02/15/2010 11:21 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: This is my last blocker for getting MySQL 5.1 series into ~arch status. itle: MySQL 5.1 unmasking Author: Robin H

[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: MySQL 5.1 bump

2010-02-15 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 02/15/2010 11:21 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: This is my last blocker for getting MySQL 5.1 series into ~arch status. itle: MySQL 5.1 unmasking Author: Robin H. Johnsonrobb...@gentoo.rog Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2010-02-15 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0

[gentoo-dev] X vs gtk USE flags

2010-02-08 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks like whining :P A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only have gtk, qt and the like. This should be declared absolutely wrong, IMHO. When a program provides a command-line tool and a GUI tool, and

[gentoo-dev] Re: X vs gtk USE flags

2010-02-08 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 02/08/2010 01:36 PM, AllenJB wrote: On 08/02/10 11:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks like whining :P A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the X USE flag and instead only have gtk, qt and the like. This should be declared

  1   2   >