On 6/9/05, Stephen P. Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Without hearing the other side of the story or seeing a transcript of
> the conversation, it is hard to say whether whoever this was reacted
> properly or not, however I would say they have a major stick up their
> ass. Don't assume everybo
On 6/8/05, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers are
> eligible to vote.
Any particular reason why Gentoo users are not allowed to have a say?
Paul
--
Rogue Tory
http://www.roguetory.org.uk
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
On 5/17/05, Francesco Riosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don't know if robbat2 need other testings but here it has been tested
> only on x86, at the moment there are no other archs avaiable for testing.
If ebuilds exist for PPC (there appears to be one for 4.1.8-r1) then
I'll be able to test it on
On 5/17/05, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MySQL-4.1.12 is in the tree (hard-masked), and I would like lots of early
> testing.
> MySQL-4.0.24-r2 is also in the tree (hard-masked) for testing, and contains
> some of the improvements in the 4.1 ebuilds, like the new pkg_config, and t
On 5/16/05, Kevin F. Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try "emerge -puDvt world", which will give you the list in an indented tree
> format useful for determining what pulled in the packages you don't want.
I think I've found out what the problem was by looking through all
those, although the de
I have a cron job on my system which runs emerge --sync && emerge -uDf
world early in the hours of the morning, so that each day I can login,
run emerge -uDp world and if I'm satisfied with what's about to be
updated I can upgrade straight away without having to wait for time
consuming syncs or dow
On 4/24/05, foser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not California here. You completely ignore the fact that some
> people commit more than others and as such are more likely to trip over
> such a rule anyway and the people who do commit a lot are usually the
> same people you don't want to revoke
On 4/24/05, Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heh, comming from non-gentoo email address :-)
I get just as annoyed if someone commits something straight to stable
and it breaks something on my system. :)
Paul
--
Rogue Tory
www.roguetory.org.uk
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 4/24/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since keywording policy seems to be being ignored again... Don't *ever*
> commit new ebuild revisions straight to stable, even if you think it's a
> trivial fix. There are plenty of things that could go wrong even with
> simple patches -- for
