Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: GnuCash 2.7+ Breaking Change

2018-01-16 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 22:19:15 + "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.ever...@iee.org> wrote: > On 16/01/18 21:56, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:58:11 +0100 > > Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> On 01/16/

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: GnuCash 2.7+ Breaking Change

2018-01-16 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
to their use cases. I would prefer to be informed and allowed to continue using such application as a part of the distro. Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: GnuCash 2.7+ Breaking Change

2018-01-16 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
copy of live GnuCash data." [2] I think generated reports are typical use of webkit in GnuCash. Are attack vectors so severe also in this case? Thank you. 1. http://gnucash.org/download.phtml 2. https://wiki.gnucash.org/wiki/Development_Process Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists

2017-12-04 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
versight > before implemented occurs. If not appropriate to file as a bug, > there are project aliases you can mail concerns to. There are also matters like this one where Bugzilla is not very appropriate medium, IMO. For example instead of replaying to list I would file a new bug with title &quo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists

2017-12-03 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
loose that channel. I am not sure if gentoo-expert was meant to be such channel; if not could you please consider it? If yes then I think gentoo-dev-user or gentoo-user-dev would be more appropriate name. Best regards, Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] NEWS item for games destabling

2017-11-21 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:53:52 -0800 Daniel Campbell <z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 11:36:33AM +0100, Róbert Čerňanský wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 10:26:29 +0100 > > David Seifert <s...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] NEWS item for games destabling

2017-11-20 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
other to test & write stabilization request bugs for games anymore? Or stabi requests will still be accepted? Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] REQUIRED_USE, global USE flags, user-friendliness...

2017-01-29 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
rder to achieve this - most likely it would be global and default ones and perhaps also the ones in make.conf. The override of a particular USE flag would be valid only while there is a need. Technically, PM would not update any configuration files (in /etc/) in this process. The required information would be stored in PM's internal structures (/var/db/pkg?). In general, I consider user friendly behaviour if emerge does not ask me anything during the update/install process. It however should clearly show me what it is going to do (with --verbose enabled). Best regards, Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags?

2016-02-11 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
n package.use. In time when last of those packages stops hard-requiring python_targets_python2_7 the python-2.7 package itself would be depcleaned and I could remove '~' entries from package.use. Nice and clean :-) . -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags?

2016-02-10 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
at > applies to useflags, but you'd probably want a "don't install this > even if it appeared to be needed" companion tool that behaves akin to > /etc/portage/package.mask This would be package.use or make.conf. -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] "Lazy" use flags?

2016-02-09 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
ow_bug.cgi?id=258371. It was also discussed on this list couple of times. I too would very much like to see it in portage. Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-08-30 23:59 UTC

2015-09-03 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
message and it's the same also there.) Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Things one could be upset about

2015-01-26 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
of GLSAs which would be actually closer to reality. I agree that (unfixed) security issues should be communicated so we do not put false hopes to GLSA. Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Things one could be upset about

2015-01-25 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 04:29:43 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Alexey Mishustin posted on Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:54:06 +0400 as excerpted: 2015-01-20 14:42 GMT+04:00 Róbert Čerňanský ope...@tightmail.com: I somehow thought that edit the overgrowing package.use file upon each

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

2015-01-24 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:54:06 +0400 Alexey Mishustin shum...@shumkar.ru wrote: 2015-01-20 14:42 GMT+04:00 Róbert Čerňanský ope...@tightmail.com: On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:08:19 +0300 Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:46:32 +0100 Róbert Čerňanský wrote

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Things one could be upset about

2015-01-21 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:57:27 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Róbert Čerňanský posted on Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:51:01 +0100 as excerpted: On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:51:31 + Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:44:25 +0100 Róbert

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

2015-01-20 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 11:08:19 +0300 Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 07:46:32 +0100 Róbert Čerňanský wrote: On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:14:29 +0300 Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:44:25 +0100 Róbert Čerňanský wrote: From my

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

2015-01-19 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:14:29 +0300 Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:44:25 +0100 Róbert Čerňanský wrote: From my point of view it would do much help if portage resolves USE dependencies automatically instead of telling the user to change USE flags manually

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

2015-01-19 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:51:31 + Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:44:25 +0100 Róbert Čerňanský ope...@tightmail.com wrote: From my point of view it would do much help if portage resolves USE dependencies automatically instead of telling the user

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

2015-01-19 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
as imperfect solution works fine, I'm ok with it. From my point of view it would do much help if portage resolves USE dependencies automatically instead of telling the user to change USE flags manually (I am talking about bug #258371). Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

2015-01-18 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
to conclusion that end-user applications may be stabilized more often. Regards, Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/cuneiform

2013-03-25 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
it in the mask note. Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/cuneiform

2013-03-25 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
it, wait until it rots completely and _then_ apply 30 day removal policy. Unmask it, if it finds a maintainer and bugs are fixed. Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope...@tightmail.com Jabber: h...@jabber.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/cuneiform

2013-03-24 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
. masking a package until it is completely broken. ** No, I do not want to become a developer. No, I do not want to maintain a package. I am the user, I want using it. (It does not mean that I do not contribute to the community, I just have other ways/projects to do so.) Robert -- Róbert

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/cuneiform

2013-03-24 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
the infrastructure. Sorry that I am addressing the policy here even you explicitly said in the document not to do so. I will not make this post longer than it is in trying to explain why I am doing it. I just hope you (and other devs) will try to listen. Robert -- Róbert Čerňanský E-mail: ope

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Bugzilla interaction guide for devs editbugs users

2010-09-07 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 08:32:16 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] 2. Special cases As a user I'd like to see following: 2.3. Upstream issues Do not close a bug (as RESOLVED/UPSTREAM) until it is fixed by upstream. Robert -- Robert Cernansky E-mail: hslis...@zoznam.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item announcing as-needed (glep 42 stuff)

2010-07-27 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 21:38:05 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: it is recommended to use LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS} your flags instead to Is it not a comma required between ${LDFLAGS} and your flags? LDFLAGS=${LDFLAGS},your flags Robert -- Robert Cernansky E-mail: hslis...@zoznam.sk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-plugins/noscript

2010-04-18 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:16:25 +0200 volk...@gentoo.org wrote: # Mounir Lamouri volk...@gentoo.org (18 Apr 2010) # The add-on/extension manager should now be used instead of the package # from the tree, bug 315999. Masked for removal in 30 days. www-plugins/noscript How unfortunate. Does the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-council] pkg_pretend USE validation and VALID_USE alternative

2010-04-01 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 03:46:47 -0700 Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:48:37AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Brian Harring wrote: | Occasionally, ebuilds will have conflicting USE flags for | functionality. Checking for them and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-09 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 00:17:18 +0100 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:13:30 +0100 Róbert Čerňanský hslis...@zoznam.sk wrote: - Minor version bumps (After examination what upstream changed and after confirmation with mantainer, if any.) The stuff you put

Re: [gentoo-dev] Low hanging bug fruit patterns

2010-03-08 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:06:40 +0100 Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote: There are a few patterns for potentially low hanging fruits among Gentoo bugs: SRC_URI errors Missing depencies (Sorry for answering a developer targeted question while I'm not one.) - Minor version bumps