Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles 17.0 hardened/no-multilib missing?

2017-12-04 Thread RB
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >> 1) there's barely any use for it, > > Well, I think that whoever use hardened barely use multilib. For the value of one anecdote, I'm a long-time hardened user and all of my hardened systems are no-multilib.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-forensics/* and other forensics@g.o packages

2017-08-13 Thread RB
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:41 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > The last update visible on pentoo.ch is from two years ago. Is the > project still active? Yes. Check their github [0] - they may have stopped caring as much about their separate bootable project, but the overlay is alive and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-forensics/* and other forensics@g.o packages

2017-08-11 Thread RB
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > app-admin/integrit > app-forensics/afflib [o] > app-forensics/air > app-forensics/autopsy > app-forensics/chkrootkit [o] > app-forensics/cmospwd > app-forensics/examiner > app-forensics/galleta > app-forensics/libewf [o] >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-arch/bzip2: bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild

2011-05-16 Thread RB
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 07:41, Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org wrote: Mike Frysinger (vapier) vap...@gentoo.org said: vapier      11/05/16 03:30:02   Removed:              bzip2-1.0.5-r1.ebuild   Log:   old Please document removal of ebuilds in ChangeLogs. It would also seem manifests

Re: [gentoo-dev] The fallacies of GLEP55

2009-05-14 Thread RB
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 13:11, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: Please explain why you claimed GLEP 55 makes things slower. Until you answer that, it's hard to take you for anything other than a troll. Hell, I'll explain. Read paragraph 8 again. Slowly. Read it a second

Re: [gentoo-dev] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-06-19 Thread RB
Regardless of the points being made or their validity, this is the long-standing problem with Gentoo: excessive pride and ego and too little inability to cooperate internally, much less externally. Too many people are treating every discussion (turned argument) as life-or-death and are unwilling

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 27

2008-04-11 Thread RB
My specific interest in it is for having a sane UID/GIDs that are identical between a set of machines, regardless of the order packages are emerged in. I was initially surprised to see Gentoo didn't have written standards for UID/GID management, but don't see many other distros having one

Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI clarifications to skel.ebuild EAPI usage

2008-03-13 Thread RB
for ratification/completion of EAPI=0 so none of you have room to complain. Until EAPI=2. RB -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list