On 27/05/07, Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...and many others...]
What I deeply miss from gentoo-dev mailing list is lack of summary at
end of discussions. Current situation is that at the end of such
disputes very often (of course not always :) is still unclear if:
* decision has be
On 01/05/07, Peter Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone care about static libs except for maybe really really low
> level stuff?
They are useful for rescue operations and whatnot, when a LiveCD or
similar is not handy; or perhaps when the computer cannot boot from an
alternative medium
On 4/27/06, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I explore this idea with any further discussion, I'll be sure to
follow the suggestions here about another list and reading past messages
on that list.
Feel free to look at http://dev.gentoo.org/~radek/portki/
Short feature lists:
* designed to
On 7/5/05, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to introduce the following security policy for web-based apps.
Why only web-based apps? What about other tools and apps exposed to the network?
--
radoslaw.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
