Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-14 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
On Saturday, 15 February 2020 3:14:55 AM AEDT Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:31 AM Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote: > > In this instance, at least two people (myself included) have drawn an > > impression that led them to voice their concern in some way (I'm unsure

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-14 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
On Friday, 14 February 2020 2:21:32 PM AEDT Matt Turner wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 4:12 AM Mike Pagano wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 06:46:43PM +1100, Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote: > > > On Thursday, 13 February 2020 5:40:46 AM AEDT Matt Turner wrote: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-12 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
On Thursday, 13 February 2020 5:40:46 AM AEDT Matt Turner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:59 AM William Hubbs wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 06:54:19PM +1100, Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote: > > > On Monday, 10 February 2020 7:55:01 AM AEDT Michał Górny wrote: > > > &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-11 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
your useless comments > everywhere, all the time and just get irritated for no benefit to > Gentoo? Perhaps I'm the one being ignorant here, but why are we lambasting someone for seeking clarification about an unusual inclusion on a review thread? -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG ID: 0xD6180C26

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-dev whitelisting

2018-05-14 Thread Sam Jorna
On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 02:57:19PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: >The whitelist automatically whitelists all @[2]gentoo.org addresses. I think those who have editbugs would also be good candidates for implicit whitelisting as well. -- Sam Jorna GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Descript

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding the State of PaX in the tree

2018-04-15 Thread Sam Jorna
viously be in a position to actually test. Though, I'm not sure how viable it is to have someone maintaining functionality to support a patchset that the majority of us cannot access... -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: media-tv/tvheadend

2018-04-09 Thread Sam Jorna
Hi All; Due to not having as much time as I'd hoped, media-tv/tvheadend is being dropped to maintainer-needed. It has two open bugs[0,1], both of which have been reassigned. [0]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633774 [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639958 Thanks; -- Sam

Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent binary/non-compiled packages from binary package creation

2017-08-10 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
On 11/08/17 03:08, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > Lets go down this rabbit hole. Let's not. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG ID: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent binary/non-compiled packages from binary package creation

2017-08-09 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
On 10/08/17 11:42, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 10:50:45 +1000 > "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wra...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On 10/08/17 06:35, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >>> FYI binpkgs have no hash. If someone did something malicious wi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent binary/non-compiled packages from binary package creation

2017-08-09 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
On 10/08/17 11:47, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:25:34 +1000 > "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wra...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On 09/08/17 10:43, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >>> Also your redistributing another's package >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent binary/non-compiled packages from binary package creation

2017-08-09 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
trator, not Gentoo (as a distro), it remains with the administrator to adhere to any relevant license restrictions. Plus the package manager can't tell if you're distributing binaries or not. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG ID: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent binary/non-compiled packages from binary package creation

2017-08-09 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
anifest file works within a repository. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG ID: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent binary/non-compiled packages from binary package creation

2017-08-08 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
On 09/08/17 10:43, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 10:29:40 +1000 > "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wra...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On 09/08/17 04:20, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >>> On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 19:32:48 +0200 >>> Kristian Fiskerst

Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent binary/non-compiled packages from binary package creation

2017-08-08 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
manager would have installed it, rather than extracting whatever upstream supplies verbatim. This includes things like any wrappers, desktop files or symlinks created by the ebuild, or other such downstream-isms. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG ID: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Allow variable refs in HOMEPAGE

2017-08-03 Thread Sam Jorna
ry. Should we always use ${PF} instead, or are some instances of ${PN} reasonable? -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing PMS to Portage Manager Specification

2017-08-01 Thread Sam Jorna
_Manager_Specification -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?

2017-07-30 Thread Sam Jorna
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 10:44:58PM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jul 2017 10:28:31 +1000 > Sam Jorna <wra...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > Wouldn't it make more sense to make Gentoo *more* attractive to run in > > corporate environments, rather than

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?

2017-07-30 Thread Sam Jorna
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 03:59:36PM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jul 2017 23:10:35 +1000 > "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wra...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On 28 July 2017 8:44:20 PM AEST, "Andreas K. Huettel" > > <dilfri...@gentoo.org&g

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?

2017-07-28 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
On 28 July 2017 8:44:20 PM AEST, "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: >Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017, 01:22:44 CEST schrieb Peter Stuge: >> >> I hold a perhaps radical view: I would like to simply remove stable. >> >> I continue to feel that maintaining two worlds (stable+unstable)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC pre-GLEP] Gentoo Git Workflow

2017-07-26 Thread Sam Jorna
vers.net > fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 +1 Given the length restriction and the requirement to include category/package, adding a bug reference doesn't leave much space for a useful description. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: systemd rootprefix migration

2017-07-13 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
. You may notice > that system units move from /usr/lib/system/system to > /lib/system/system as you upgrade/re-install packages; this is normal. > Units will function properly from both locations. s:/lib/system:: > As always, if you run into problems, please report a bug. Otherwise, lgtm. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG ID: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Auto adding packages to world was -> Sets vs Meta ebuilds

2017-07-12 Thread Sam Jorna
y you are having a hard time grasping this very simple concept. > I am done, reply if you like, but this thread is serious noise now... Clearly, hence why I was trying to understand what difference your proposal offered. But since we're moving on to serious things now, I guess I /am/ done wit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Auto adding packages to world was -> Sets vs Meta ebuilds

2017-07-12 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
On 12/07/17 16:06, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:49:14 +1000 > "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wra...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> I have trouble remembering what I ate for dinner last night, let alone >> what I may or may not have merged a week,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Auto adding packages to world was -> Sets vs Meta ebuilds

2017-07-11 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
e may or may not be a dependency, may or may not have been --oneshot'd. It may have been installed as a dependency but the requiring package was removed, or may have been installed as an orphan but is now a dependency. Assuming that if it's not in a set it must be a dependency is incorrect and misleading. -- Sam J

Re: [gentoo-dev] Auto adding packages to world was -> Sets vs Meta ebuilds

2017-07-11 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
m, > profile, and set files. > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624630 My point was that --unmerge is not intended to be dependency-aware. --depclean is. As far as I can tell, that is the point others have been trying to make as well, when pointing out the differences between -c and -C. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG ID: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Auto adding packages to world was -> Sets vs Meta ebuilds

2017-07-11 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
se taking a hammer to a problem or with a particular desire to recover a broken system. Again, it's doing exactly what it's supposed to - removing a package you've told it to remove (unless it's one of the few almost-always-critical packages). -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG ID: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: taking a break from arches stabilization

2017-07-11 Thread Sam Jorna (wraeth)
ell, also preventing stabilisation of packages with some known issue. Therefore packages with known issues don't get stabilised automatically. Similarly, if the maintainer believes more comprehensive testing should be done (eg. for critical base-system packages) a note could be made somewhere of that requirement (metadata.xml?), meaning significantly reduced workload for people like ago (if the maintainer doesn't stabilise it beforehand). -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG ID: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-21 Thread Sam Jorna
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:47:19AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On pon, 2017-05-22 at 11:52 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: > > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since > > > they > > > were u

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-21 Thread Sam Jorna
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:12:54AM +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: > > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since > >> they > >> were unconditiona

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-21 Thread Sam Jorna
ata.xml's in the tree with examples, including a few for which you are one of the maintainers. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Guidelines for IUSE defaults

2017-02-07 Thread Sam Jorna
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:11:20PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Sam Jorna <wra...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 12:00:51PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <a...

Re: [gentoo-dev] Guidelines for IUSE defaults

2017-02-07 Thread Sam Jorna
ry, and letting advanced users break their egg in their quest for an omelette? How is this different (for example, not pointing fingers) from dev-lang/python[threads] being forced because it's broken without it (therefore critical functionality)? Disclaimer: not trying to be argumentative, just tr

Re: [gentoo-dev] Guidelines for IUSE defaults

2017-02-02 Thread Sam Jorna
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:26:20PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 02/02/2017 09:22 PM, Sam Jorna wrote: > > > > Also, how would this work with local USE flags as opposed to global > > flags? Would they be acceptable to have IUSE defaults? > > > > Exactly t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Guidelines for IUSE defaults

2017-02-02 Thread Sam Jorna
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 09:06:33PM -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 02/02/2017 09:00 PM, Sam Jorna wrote: > > > > Consider: a new user, coming from Ubuntu or Fedora or Windows, starts > > building their system. They start installing packages they want, only t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Guidelines for IUSE defaults

2017-02-02 Thread Sam Jorna
d the help most (not to discount more advanced users, but they are more likely to *want* to tweak than one for whom this is their first CLI). That's my two cents, at least. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Why lastrite when it works? (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due to retirement)

2017-01-17 Thread Sam Jorna
encies won't need to be explicitly unmasked. You may end up with gentoo.git-provided packages coming from the overlay if they have newer versions, though when talking about graveyard, that shouldn't be an issue. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GPG ID: 0xD6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stats: Gentoo developer commit timeline

2017-01-16 Thread Sam Jorna
nd Amynka! -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-12-18 23:59 UTC

2016-12-18 Thread Sam Jorna
lease retain authorship of > contributed patches," in light of which it might be cool if we could get > the author's name listed above rather than the committer (when the > author is not a developer). +1 I imagine it shouldn't be too hard to get the Author attribute of a given commit rather than Committer. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device

2016-12-13 Thread Sam Jorna
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 02:35:28PM +1100, Sam Jorna wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:34:21AM +0700, gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Dec 2016, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > > On 12/11/2016 03:13 PM, gro...@gentoo.org wrote: > > >> gpg: signing failed:

Re: [gentoo-dev] gpg: signing failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device

2016-12-11 Thread Sam Jorna
succeeded. I was also getting some odd issues with commit signing, though it seemed to settle for me when I switched to pinentry-curses (since I use awesome), so I figured it was probably a local issue. Perhaps there's a wider problem here? -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

2016-12-06 Thread Sam Jorna
the mails? I can test post, if that is > helpful? I can see you've posted something to the list just now. If you need to reconfigure your settings so it mails you, send a mail to gentoo-proxy-maint+h...@lists.gentoo.org to see [0]options. [0] https://www.gentoo.org/get-involved/mailing-lists/instructions.html -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

2016-12-06 Thread Sam Jorna
e. [0] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Recruiters#What_does_the_recruitment_process_involve.3F [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Recruiters#Current_quizzes -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

2016-12-06 Thread Sam Jorna
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 01:17:54PM +1100, Sam Jorna wrote: > have a look at the new [0]Mentors project, or even send a mail to -dev I forgot the link, sorry: [0] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Mentors -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cross Post due to technical component - Thanks for all the fish

2016-12-06 Thread Sam Jorna
would go to your mentor. If you don't have a mentor, try approaching a developer with whom you've been working and see if they will be able to. Alternatively, you can have a look at the new [0]Mentors project, or even send a mail to -dev asking for one. I look forward to having another contributor among the ranks. :) -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Proposal for addition of distribution variables

2016-12-04 Thread Sam Jorna
that's just my two cents. :) -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-11-30 Thread Sam Jorna
f). Amending commits that are not the tip of your local clone will probably need an interactive rebase though (but I could be wrong about that). -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GPG ID: 0xD6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

2016-06-08 Thread Sam Jorna
t of bugs and PR's to be done, so we would welcome any new members wishing to help facilitate user contributions! [0] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers/Managing_Requests [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Proxy_Maintainers/Maintainer_Bugs_and_Maintainership_Requests Cheers;

Re: Facilitating user contributed ebuilds (Was: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project)

2016-06-08 Thread Sam Jorna
Even excepting the significant technical issues such as dependencies and security issues, even something as simple as versioning, if interpreted differently between users, could prove difficult to overcome. Not to mention SLOTting... -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) <wra...@gentoo.org> GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project

2016-06-07 Thread Sam Jorna
packages that people want actively maintained to be picked up, and still leaves the rest available in the overlay outside of gentoo.git so they don't cause any major dramas. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) <wra...@gentoo.org> GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Lastrites: sci-geosciences/qlandkartegt{,-garmindev}

2016-05-23 Thread Sam Jorna
# Sam Jorna <wra...@gentoo.org> (24 May 2016) # Deprecated in favour of sci-geosciences/qmapshack. # See bugs 561788 and 582262 # Masked for removal in 30 days. sci-geosciences/qlandkartegt sci-geosciences/qlandkartegt-garmindev -- Sam Jorna GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Descr

Re: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests

2016-05-20 Thread Sam Jorna
nterest of an invisible audience; userland As far as I know, users (as in non-maintainers - those out "in the wild") can file keyword request bugs and it's up to the maintainer to then determine relevancy and CC appropriate arch teams; and Bugzilla has a voting feature[0] allowing users to indicate the strength of community demand by voting on those bugs (which I have seen done previously). [0] https://bugs.gentoo.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html#votes -- Sam Jorna GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for enhancement to PMS/EAPI7+

2016-05-17 Thread Sam Jorna
becomes 4 lines. > > 4 lines of which 3 are redundant and simply re-codify existing behaviour. Unless you define DOCS and include the default documents, which is an additional 78 characters on one line (excluding any potential globbing, and assuming all default files are wanted)

Re: [gentoo-dev] NEW: split portage/repoman releases now in the tree

2016-05-16 Thread Sam Jorna
a number of gen-b0rk repo test ebuilds. > > Coacher for the recent testing, bug reports and patches. > And anyone else I missed ;) Thank you to everyone involved! :) -- Sam Jorna GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-games/mygui/

2016-04-20 Thread Sam Jorna
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 08:57:52AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Just FYI, we're talking about upstream maintainer elements which do not take > part in bug assignment. Ah, yes, I missed that; though it may have been done as something related to that - just putting it out there. Cheers; -

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-games/mygui/

2016-04-19 Thread Sam Jorna
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:52:24PM +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:47:43PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:13:34 + (UTC) > > "Patrice Clement" <monsie...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > commit: 4f2477c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-games/mygui/

2016-04-19 Thread Sam Jorna
FYI: Members of the Proxy Maintainers project decided that the inclusion of the element was superfluous and that the ordering of elements was sufficient for determining bug assignment/CC'ing based on the bug-wranglers policy[0] (which does not explicitly mention ). -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG Key: D6180C26 signature.asc Description: Digital signature