On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 16:38 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
There are about 9 plugins for monkeyd similar to apache
which can be turned on/off by a configure switch. It makes sense to
follow the same logic as apache here.
Indeed it does. Particularly if it avoids a non-obvious USE-flag that
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 20:08 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
What are your thoughts?
Sensible document. Can we have it on the agenda for the council meeting
please. It looks suitable for a yes/no vote, and I expect some guidance
from the wider developer community in how they respond on the list.
Good evening,
Please note the preliminary agenda for the February 12 council meeting, to
be held at 20:00 UTC. If you are appointing a proxy to attend in your
stead, please make this known at least two hours before the meeting
starts.
1) Roll call.
2) Open bug(s) with council involvement.
For
On Tue, 2013-01-01 at 16:01 -0500, Jeff Horelick wrote:
dev-util/pkgconf has less external dependencies, is lighter and is
faster than dev-util/pkgconfig while being now 100% compatible
That sounds like a clear win. If it has survived the tinderboxing there
likely isn't much to hold you back.
On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 21:05 -0600, Ben Kohler wrote:
This seems like a great time to deprecate remove the unmaintained
server profile target, as has been previously discussed. Is this
doable or is that another issue to be tackled another day?
I would not attach it to this bill just before
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 15:14 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
Go bring up the suggestion that the kernel should support direct
booting on lkml
And be pointed at EFI_STUB functionality. Next?
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Good afternoon,
In less than two weeks, on Tuesday January the 8th, the council will meet
again.
Now is the time to prepare raise items that you feel should be put to a vote.
Please reply to this e-mail with any suggested agenda items. Even if you have
raised
the issue on a mailing list
On Wed, 2012-12-26 at 22:01 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
Actually, since ulm pointed out in another thread that the
council has not mandated that we support separate /usr without an
initramfs, I am re-considering this.
So now that the /usr-merge steamroller can not break systems through
udev,
On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 23:10 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Arch team people think that this should be handled before but... how
should it be handled?
I agree with the arch teams here. You can do something as mundane as:
if [ -e /proc/modules ]; then
COMPLICATED MODULE MADNESS
fi
Regards,
Tony
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 21:09 +0200, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
Maybe Tony mismerged your changes into his?
Thank you for your trust in me.
cvs commit -m completed non-interactively, without notification of
conflict or request to merge.
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
Good evening,
As per bug #421037, there is a demand to make multiple voicemail storage
backends switchable within the ebuild. The USE_EXPAND mechanism would
automatically provide an explanation of the selections being made (as
opposed to overloading USE=odbc in what seems to me a non-obvious
On 14/05/12 16:44, hasufell wrote:
However, I don't see references to ebuild policy (in devmanual or
howtos) how to handle Werror.
As can be judged by the title of my patches on the subject, I consider
-Werror to be short-sighted at best and idiotic at worst. The next GCC
version, which will
On 30/04/12 05:31, William Hubbs wrote:
Correction here; as far as I know the council did not mandate
separate /usr without initramfs. They just said that separate /usr
is a supported configuration.
Separate /usr is a supported configuration, which blocks the armwaving
about oh just use an
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:53 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
Does this answer any fears about trying to force an untimely
stabilization?
It certainly helps me sleep at night, yes. Any... inconveniences forced
on me have to be fixed over 40 times.
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: This
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 22:53 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
dev-vcs/git needs python eclasses to have EAPI4 so REQUIRED_USE can be
used to solve bug #353657.
Similar problems in dev-vcs/subversion...
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 29/09/11 16:02, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Is there any chance that we can agree to reject
unsigned manifests? Possibly a question for the Council to adjudicate?
I am happy to back a mandatory signing policy for the main gentoo-x86
tree. This is a simple yes or no question that the council
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 23:18 +0200, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Well it would be something like priority based queue with maximum 60
points value.
Each update after the month in main tree would get 0 points for
stabilisation, any-developer / maintainer would be able to add up to
40 points to any
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 16:48 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Should be right after CC instead
Okay, rediffed, compile-tested committed.
Will do the same for recent commit on irda-utils.
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 19:53 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
I've been too busy with other things to work on Gentoo for quite some
time and this isn't going to change now that I've just picked up new
study and work commitments.
You will be missed Daniel. It was always pleasant working with you.
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 13:34 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
This is madness, people. Two herds and four separately mentioned
developers?
This is madness.
THIS IS HARDENED.
Why don't you join a herd? Go on, it's fun and you don't
have to be alone!
This was originally done because we were
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 18:04 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
As many of you have already noticed, there are some arches that are quite
slow on stabilizations. This leads to deprecated stabilizations e.g a
package is stabilized after 60 days which makes that version of
the specific package
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 17:45 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
If possible I think we should try to keep stable keywords. So how can we
help? I'm not sure how I could help e.g. PPC - I don't have any hardware
I can test on, and I'm not aware of remotely accessible dev boxen.
There are options, an
with your vote and
not in this mailing list.
Regards,
Tony Chainsaw Vroon
1: https://www.linx.net/about/index.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2010-06-05 at 16:36 +0200, Alex Legler wrote:
Chainsaw, Fauli and sping please.
Thank you Alex. I accept.
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 16:16 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote:
So the attendance to council meetings is enough to prove that a member
is active? 0_o
Yes, since council meetings are where the crucial voting happens.
Council members that fail to show up to meetings are not generating the
output we
On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 20:29 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
I use the above, and will take them.
Please do feel free to take g15daemon friends as well, I've not been
able to provide them with the attention they deserve.
media-plugins/audacious-g15-spectrum
I'd rather just get this upstream
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 11:03 -0700, James Ausmus wrote:
I might be interested in taking maintainership of this
+*ogg2mp3-0.5.1 (18 Jun 2009)
+
+ 18 Jun 2009; chain...@gentoo.org -ogg2mp3-0.5.ebuild,
+ +ogg2mp3-0.5.1.ebuild, metadata.xml:
+ First release from new maintainer James Ausmus,
# Tony Vroon chain...@gentoo.org (17 Jun 2009)
# Dead homepage, upstream vows not to maintain it anymore. No sense
packaging abandoned software.
# Removal: July 17, 2009
media-sound/ogg2mp3
For bug #274123. Should you wish to rescue it, you will take sole
maintainership and become upstream,
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 11:03 -0700, James Ausmus wrote:
I might be interested in taking maintainership of this
Please let me know when the homepage and repository are ready. You would
have to apply the 'prevent endian swapping' patch and roll a new
tarball.
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 00:58 +0100, Mike Auty wrote:
So I'll leave the source version out of the tree, but I'd like thoughts
on using RPM as a solution? Also I don't know whether an exception
could be made for Gentoo, but equally I don't know how to phrase one of
them either (Gentoo Foundation
On Sun, 2009-06-14 at 21:28 +0100, Mike Auty wrote:
but I thought I should ask what
the best course of action would be here?
If it were my ebuild, I would not add the updates under the new,
draconic license and either fork the GPL'd code or mask the package for
removal.
You can not in any way
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 17:18 +0100, Torsten Veller wrote:
Remember pkg_preinst is called after src_install.
Right, I'll change that back. It got in my way during unpack cycles.
BTW: ROOT should be respected in pkg_postinst too.
I'll add that.
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: This
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 13:37 +0200, Mateusz A. Mierzwiński wrote:
Hi,
I just want to know, what happen with 2.6.26 kernel sources? I've
installed (compiled and copy all KO's to kernel modules directory, run
init script loading modules) of RTL-8187B Wireless Card but error occured:
This
Good afternoon fellow developers,
There are three ebuilds that I used to maintain that I no longer have the
hardware for.
I'm hoping that one of you could give them some love. Do assign the bugs to
yourself,
and please drop me from the relevant metadata.xml once you do.
They are:
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 15:14 -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
I have a thinkpad with the right hardware, so I can take this one, did
you already pimp out your other thinkpad packages?
I don't recall of other thinkpad packages that are still mine, but if
you see my name on them, they're all yours.
On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 01:16 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
If it is for software where I am also upstream (Audacious for example),
it does tend to annoy me when people try their utmost to file bug
reports before I commit my ebuild.
36 matches
Mail list logo
