Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-03 Thread Torsten Rehn
restrictions on filing bump requests and welcome users to open bugs. Closing (valid) bugs feels good and is also sort of a psychological reward for the user who opened the bug, perhaps encouraging them to stay in direct contact with Gentoo and contribute other, less trivial work. -- Torsten Rehn

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bugzilla enhancements wrt AT work

2008-03-15 Thread Torsten Rehn
this change. Discuss. Also notice bug 213514 [2] for actual progress on this. [1] http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_a5495659df35010ae44c266dd785ae4e.xml [2] http://bugs.gentoo.org/213514 -- Torsten Rehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester http://scel.info signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bugzilla enhancements wrt AT work

2008-03-15 Thread Torsten Rehn
see any problem with this? -- Torsten Rehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester http://scel.info signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keyword request interface (SoC candidate?)

2008-02-28 Thread Torsten Rehn
as a long term experiment starting with SoC, that may eventually produce something that satisfies most of the developer staff. [1] http://scel.info/blog/posts/google-soc-proposal/ -- Torsten Rehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester http://scel.info signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Deprecating an eclass

2008-02-18 Thread Torsten Rehn
multiple eclasses deprecated by multiple eclasses may not be that common, but this kind of syntax allows for some grouping of related eclasses being replaced together. -- Torsten Rehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester http://scel.info signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [gentoo-dev] public system of ratings

2008-02-16 Thread Torsten Rehn
software is already in the tree, if you need something else, filing a bug is not too much effort. -- Torsten Rehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester http://scel.info signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to get more involved?

2008-01-30 Thread Torsten Rehn
-help irc channel. Please note that this list is intended to be used for discussion of Gentoo development, not ebuild development. [1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=2chap=1 [2] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ebuild-submit.xml -- Torsten Rehn [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Torsten Rehn
On Wednesday 14 November 2007, Mike Doty wrote: S=${WORKDIR} Shouldn't ${WORKDIR} be quoted here, too? Kind regards -- Torsten Rehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester http://scel.info signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Torsten Rehn
to be quoted when assigning its value to another variable (${S}) by reference. [EMAIL PROTECTED] cat test.sh #!/bin/bash TEXT=A B Q=${TEXT} echo ${TEXT} FAIL=DONT TRYTHISATHOME [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./test.sh A B ./test.sh: line 5: TRYTHISATHOME: command not found -- Torsten Rehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: emul-linux-x86.eclass

2007-11-14 Thread Torsten Rehn
evaluated and passed to the command in question and cannot be protected anymore by bash. AFAIK. -- Torsten Rehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentoo AMD64 Arch Tester http://scel.info signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nero-3.0.0.0 license needs RESTRICT=fetch ?

2007-07-06 Thread Torsten Rehn
On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote: And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run? They'll already have installed the software, which requires acceptance of the license. No violation here: [...] IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO THE TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT,