ering, what would be the role of the gentoo-dev after
the proposed change. If it is agreed that gentoo-dev has become unusable
for development work and the discussion is moved elsewhere, what would
be the intended purpose of the current list?
--
Tuomo Hartikainen
opportunity?
>
>
> Surely there is a wider audience that will see some packages they like
> are going away because there are not enough maintainers, and thus
> respond by 'stepping up' to maintain a few packages?
I would think those who are interested in (and capable of) maintaining
packages would already be subscribed to gentoo-dev.
--
Tuomo Hartikainen
each him, he's better equipped to learn. :p
>
> Hence, the suggestion includes both.
>
> - Solve the immediate issue.
> - Include information to solving the issue in future.
And he would probably still mail the whole list the next time, because
it is easier for him than refering to
