Donnie-
thanks for the suggestion (guess I need to look through app-portage
before I post next time). I'll check out these tools (though they are
written in perl. I was thinking about using python)
-matt
On 10/26/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
m h wrote:
Other than a text
Other than a text editor?
I'd like to have a tool that can add USE flags on a per package or
global level. (I'm doing this in some build scripts and would prefer
just to have a tool, rather than sed or some other shell hackery).
I couldn't find anything via a quick search on google.
Here's my
Other than a text editor?
I'd like to have a tool that can add USE flags on a per package or
global level. (I'm doing this in some build scripts and would prefer
just to have a tool, rather than sed or some other shell hackery).
I couldn't find anything via a quick search on google.
Here's my
Hey folks-
(Shamelessly copied from my blog[1] )...
I'm working on an open source tool for managing war files called
warconfig (warconfig is/should be to wars as webappconfig is to php
apps). We have a need for this at work. I have a pretty detailed write
up here [2]. Warconfig is a tool for
On 8/4/06, Renat Lumpau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 01:48:50AM -0600, m h wrote:
Hey folks-
(Shamelessly copied from my blog[1] )...
I'm working on an open source tool for managing war files called
warconfig (warconfig is/should be to wars as webappconfig is to php
Have you looked at Cargo? http://cargo.codehaus.org/
I figured I'd get this question. i briefly played with cargo. (In
fact I'm planning on asking the cargo people for feedback as week).
Perhaps if one are interested in manipulating wars from ant/maven,
cargo is the way to go. But
On 5/9/06, Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
m h posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Mon, 08 May 2006 21:38:49 -0700:
hat is the status of my patches? I'm assumming that they are
rejected... I'm curious the know the reason. If the plan is to
migrate to a new improved version
is going to be around for a while, why
the objection to cleaning up the code?
Not meaning to fan any flames here. I'm not on IRC 24-7, so I
probably miss a lot of the action.
thanks
matt
On 5/2/06, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a stab at pre10...
The order of application is the order
feedback is welcome.
-matt
On 5/1/06, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on the recent Stabilizing portage 2.1 thread, should I provide
patches based on pre9 or pre10?
thanks
matt
On 4/30/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
m h wrote:
OK will do that. Since, I'm not a patching pro
Based on the recent Stabilizing portage 2.1 thread, should I provide
patches based on pre9 or pre10?
thanks
matt
On 4/30/06, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
m h wrote:
OK will do that. Since, I'm not a patching pro, can you suggest a
good way of creating a series of patches
with the revamp of Global vars in one commit, and
then the re-arrangement in the other.
m h wrote:
Yes, I can break it up, but it will probably be 3 one line changes and
one big 1000 line change. The 1000 line change is pretty
straightforward. The only real code changes per se are removing any
Upon further testing, I'm updating a line in the patch
On 4/28/06, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks-
I'm submitting a patch of a refactoring of the emerge code in
2.1_pre9-r5. This patch adds no features per se. But I believe it
makes the code much more readable. This only addresses
to
figure out what/when/where happened
m h wrote:
Upon further testing, I'm updating a line in the patch
On 4/28/06, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks-
I'm submitting a patch of a refactoring of the emerge code in
2.1_pre9-r5. This patch adds no features per se. But I believe it
makes
Hi all-
I've googled and RTFM for SLOTS which from what I can tell is this paragraph:
With Portage different versions of a single package can coexist on a
system. While other distributions tend to name their package to those
versions (like freetype and freetype2) Portage uses a technology
called
If we had an official place where people could complain about ebuilds
not being stabilized, then I have a feeling most developers would avoid
it like the plague. Stuff like this is along the same lines as the
bump it!!!eleventy-one11!11 bugs which get filed the minute there is a
new release
Subject says it all.
This isn't meant as flamebait. I'm running stable on my laptop and
unstable on my desktop. It seems like most KDE release get better
over time, so I'm just wondering what the process is with KDE?
thanks
-matt
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 4/3/06, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 01:05, m h wrote:
This isn't meant as flamebait. I'm running stable on my laptop and
unstable on my desktop. It seems like most KDE release get better
over time, so I'm just wondering what the process
I'm not a gentoo dev (just a satisfied user), but I lurk on this list.
I was at PyCon last month. I would estimate that about 40% of the
people there ran linux on their laptops. The most popular distros
were gentoo and ubuntu. (Not this is not a scientific study, just my
observations from
George-
Not sure if you have seen this or not. Check out Conary [1] from
rPath. Think of it as Rpm+Ebuild+Distributed. It's done by some
people who used to be at Redhat and in one of the whitepapers, they
specifically mention portage/ebuild.
-matt
1 - http://wiki.conary.com/FrontPage
On
Hmmm, then I must be missing where the spec file gets generated,
because there is no code in ebuild.py that does it...
On 10/26/05, Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
m h wrote:
I'm trying to run
ebuild path/to/ebuild rpm
and it's failing because there is no .spec file from which to build
/). If anyone can
elaborate on the efforts going on in that arena, I'm all ears.
matt
On 10/5/05, Alec Joseph Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
m h wrote:
Hey Folks-
I'm working on trying to get prefixed installs working. (As such, I'm
using some code kindly modified by Michael Haubenwallner
On 10/5/05, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 01:48:03PM -0700, m h wrote:
On 10/5/05, Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yay, time for another flame war (just what I'd love to spend my time
on).
Sorry, I'm really not trying to kindle any flames here
Thanks for the warning Alec. Since I already have very limited
knowledge of the internals, I figure this will be a good trial by fire
(learn sort of the portage internals and issues with prefixed
installs). If it works, perhaps I will be able to devote more time to
it and do more than a simple
Michael-
Thanks for your reply.
Is it possible to put your complete steps along with links to custom code you've done in the gentoo wiki?
I'd very much like to try and replicate what you have done.
thanks againOn 9/9/05, Michael Haubenwallner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matt,m h wrote: Hi
Thanks for the response, I guess I'll post to the osx mailing list, but
really my issue isn't about osx per se, but taking the osx portage port
and making it run on any posix system (solaris, osx, flavors of linux
etc) in a sandboxed environment.
I've read through the developer documentation and
), but would like to collaborate with
others interested in this. I'm not very familiar with the inner
workings of portage (just a happy gentoo user since 2002), but I am
comfortable with bash and python and have read the developers
documentation.
Thoughts, comments?On 9/8/05, m h [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hello-
I'm investigating the similarities between portage and openpkg.
More specifically I was wondering if it is possible to take portage and
install in on top of an existing linux installation in its own sandbox
(similar to what openpkg does). I've done some googling and found
the documentation
27 matches
Mail list logo
