[gentoo-dev] Re: redistribute intel rpms

2009-11-12 Thread Duncan
Sébastien Fabbro posted on Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:55:20 -0800 as excerpted: > To make myself clearer, the tar ball includes a few binary rpms and a > installer blob. Both icc and ifc tar ball include the mkl, idb and some > common library rpms. If we go for a kde-split with a mirror restrict > approa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: redistribute intel rpms

2009-11-11 Thread Sébastien Fabbro
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Duncan wrote: > The big combo tarball could then be restrict=mirror or whatever, with > or without a specific user click-thru (and restrict=interactive or > whatever) as necessary and already used on some packages, following > existing policies. > > Of course, there's certainl

[gentoo-dev] Re: redistribute intel rpms

2009-11-07 Thread Duncan
Sébastien Fabbro posted on Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:04:41 -0800 as excerpted: > We have a few fetch restricted Intel packages in the main tree (icc, > ifc, mkl, ipp, tbb). All except tbb are closed-source but free with > non-commercial licenses. Lately upstream has repackaged the icc and > ifort (ifc)