Re: [gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag
Ühel kenal päeval, P, 19.04.2020 kell 20:20, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp: > > Personally I would opt for global "appindicator" as it seems to be > > more widely > > used and I think it is a bit more self-explanatory :/ > > So I assume we can have* > consensus here, so I'll start off with renaming it > in nm-applet as part of other changes, and assume this ends up as a > global USE flag eventually. Note that ayatana already is a global USE flag, but I agree with migrating that over to appindicator instead, just a global USE flag to remove then later as well. Mart signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 06.04.2020 kell 15:23, kirjutas Pacho Ramos: > El jue, 02-04-2020 a las 16:28 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > Hello, > > > > I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage > > of > > libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that > > in the > > tree. > > "ayatana" is the only global one, while other packages are using > > "indicator", > > "libindicate", "appindicator"... > > > > Personally I would merge all them in only one, and I wonder if > > maybe > > "indicator" > > or "appindicator" would be more meaningful for most users than > > "ayatana", what > > do you think? > > > > Thanks > > Personally I would opt for global "appindicator" as it seems to be > more widely > used and I think it is a bit more self-explanatory :/ So I assume we can consensus here, so I'll start off with renaming it in nm-applet as part of other changes, and assume this ends up as a global USE flag eventually. Mart signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag
On 4/6/20 9:23 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El jue, 02-04-2020 a las 16:28 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: >> Hello, >> >> I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage of >> libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that in the >> tree. >> "ayatana" is the only global one, while other packages are using "indicator", >> "libindicate", "appindicator"... >> >> Personally I would merge all them in only one, and I wonder if maybe >> "indicator" >> or "appindicator" would be more meaningful for most users than "ayatana", >> what >> do you think? >> >> Thanks > > Personally I would opt for global "appindicator" as it seems to be more widely > used and I think it is a bit more self-explanatory :/ > SGTM -- NP-Hardass signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:23 AM Pacho Ramos wrote: > > El jue, 02-04-2020 a las 16:28 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > Hello, > > > > I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage of > > libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that in the > > tree. > > "ayatana" is the only global one, while other packages are using > > "indicator", > > "libindicate", "appindicator"... > > > > Personally I would merge all them in only one, and I wonder if maybe > > "indicator" > > or "appindicator" would be more meaningful for most users than "ayatana", > > what > > do you think? > > > > Thanks > > Personally I would opt for global "appindicator" as it seems to be more widely > used and I think it is a bit more self-explanatory :/ Sounds reasonable to me.
Re: [gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag
El jue, 02-04-2020 a las 16:28 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > Hello, > > I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage of > libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that in the > tree. > "ayatana" is the only global one, while other packages are using "indicator", > "libindicate", "appindicator"... > > Personally I would merge all them in only one, and I wonder if maybe > "indicator" > or "appindicator" would be more meaningful for most users than "ayatana", what > do you think? > > Thanks Personally I would opt for global "appindicator" as it seems to be more widely used and I think it is a bit more self-explanatory :/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag
Hello, I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage of libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that in the tree. "ayatana" is the only global one, while other packages are using "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator"... Personally I would merge all them in only one, and I wonder if maybe "indicator" or "appindicator" would be more meaningful for most users than "ayatana", what do you think? Thanks signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
