Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml
On Sunday 21 March 2010 17:22:55 Thomas Sachau wrote: Am 21.03.2010 18:06, schrieb Mike Frysinger: On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:41:15 Thomas Sachau wrote: I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign related ebuilds/bugs to m-n. if someone were to step up, we'd have to undo any changes we just did. why not add m-n to the herd definition. What exactly do you suggest? My suggestion is to give people some time to join that herd (which had open bugs back from 2006!) for some time and if nothing happens, remove this unused herd and assign bugs and ebuilds to m-n, so people at least see, that those ebuilds are not maintained, instead of getting the false impression of maintainership by an empty herd. deleting logical herds and updating all the xml files takes effort, as does reverting those changes when someone steps up. from what i can see, there is no gain doing this. simple mark the herd itself as m-n, update the staffing needs page, and then re-assign the bugs to m-n while keeping sgml herd in the cc. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 02:25:43AM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: Here is a list of the packages that would be moved to maintainer-wanted: app-doc/halibut app-office/passepartout app-text/asciidoc app-text/build-docbook-catalog app-text/docbook2X app-text/docbook-dsssl-stylesheets app-text/docbook-sgml-dtd app-text/docbook-sgml app-text/docbook-sgml-utils app-text/docbook-xml-dtd app-text/docbook-xml-simple-dtd app-text/docbook-xsl-stylesheets app-text/gentoo-guide-xml-dtd app-text/grutatxt app-text/html2text app-text/html401 app-text/htmlrecode app-text/htmltidy app-text/html-xml-utils app-text/linuxdoc-tools app-text/openjade app-text/opensp app-text/robodoc app-text/sablotron app-text/sgml-common app-text/sgmltools-lite app-text/sgrep app-text/txt2tags app-text/xhtml1 app-text/xml2doc app-text/xml2 app-text/xmlformat app-text/xmlstarlet app-text/xmlto www-client/htmlview The following packages would be dropped to the remaining maintainers: app-emacs/nxml-mode (emacs) app-emacs/psgml (emacs) app-text/gnome-doc-utils (gnome) app-text/highlight (tex) app-text/scrollkeeper-dtd (gnome) app-text/scrollkeeper (gnome) app-text/webgen (ruby) dev-ruby/xml-simple (ruby) A lot of useful stuff here. I've added myself and tampakrap to the sgml herd, we'll try to keep it in good shape :) -- Alex Alexander :: wired Gentoo Developer www.linuxized.com pgpug5W71Iomd.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml
I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign related ebuilds/bugs to m-n. -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml
On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:41:15 Thomas Sachau wrote: I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign related ebuilds/bugs to m-n. if someone were to step up, we'd have to undo any changes we just did. why not add m-n to the herd definition. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml
Am 21.03.2010 18:06, schrieb Mike Frysinger: On Sunday 21 March 2010 08:41:15 Thomas Sachau wrote: I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign related ebuilds/bugs to m-n. if someone were to step up, we'd have to undo any changes we just did. why not add m-n to the herd definition. -mike What exactly do you suggest? My suggestion is to give people some time to join that herd (which had open bugs back from 2006!) for some time and if nothing happens, remove this unused herd and assign bugs and ebuilds to m-n, so people at least see, that those ebuilds are not maintained, instead of getting the false impression of maintainership by an empty herd. -- Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty herd: sgml
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-03-2010 11:41, Thomas Sachau wrote: I see, that the sgml herd seems to be empty for a longer time, so i would like to ask, if someone wants to take that herd and the related ebuilds and bugs over or if we should delete that herd and assign related ebuilds/bugs to m-n. Here is a list of the packages that would be moved to maintainer-wanted: app-doc/halibut app-office/passepartout app-text/asciidoc app-text/build-docbook-catalog app-text/docbook2X app-text/docbook-dsssl-stylesheets app-text/docbook-sgml-dtd app-text/docbook-sgml app-text/docbook-sgml-utils app-text/docbook-xml-dtd app-text/docbook-xml-simple-dtd app-text/docbook-xsl-stylesheets app-text/gentoo-guide-xml-dtd app-text/grutatxt app-text/html2text app-text/html401 app-text/htmlrecode app-text/htmltidy app-text/html-xml-utils app-text/linuxdoc-tools app-text/openjade app-text/opensp app-text/robodoc app-text/sablotron app-text/sgml-common app-text/sgmltools-lite app-text/sgrep app-text/txt2tags app-text/xhtml1 app-text/xml2doc app-text/xml2 app-text/xmlformat app-text/xmlstarlet app-text/xmlto www-client/htmlview The following packages would be dropped to the remaining maintainers: app-emacs/nxml-mode (emacs) app-emacs/psgml (emacs) app-text/gnome-doc-utils (gnome) app-text/highlight (tex) app-text/scrollkeeper-dtd (gnome) app-text/scrollkeeper (gnome) app-text/webgen (ruby) dev-ruby/xml-simple (ruby) - -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIbBAEBAgAGBQJLpuM3AAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEP5h4P91jz8Ud4anKN809+34k5hHMQ 71vmLWkzXHRBRzrGZr+2XxvkRcdB7NxnKvB4/5y25ZyNz45oSL65Ai1o+julnv4B XO0nQQyn3FKkhCt2P8atLRTikGDPPrf00QmslplgxxJEjFIJL68fEpg8AMYNeqBj qnnp+TEhyJ03J3lAl8hxPjqb3LHiWx2pQwyueDil8HrLZMobe0KGODpJG4gmj80i zTZR8R1Li/aUcOgCrDHg4vtMaYhq9bD+BajS9/JdCNjJBhw27R3bK5DSTJJMEG03 WmxGkyih6gzJ0N6gwyknmhNOkVYD6YHhyeU73deQ4tnQ7eIjw1GwEoTHzzdOGXVd 8fr6PCe+4RlvG21eIhx3Slajk/BXZic8UNNu2FsxSAgkHc0vF02dqq5mB4wN08XZ r68Z//QzCLCVWdg+oULQO/3iN/2CqrkMQlcJAqB1DXs4ldxaijrtJlXumnP4L+85 GYxYPROFyHBkW7a/PPe+OZQIExqjG64BMOfPGIgzOQQsLjZtlPM/kGvE0RfFJ0J7 PmCD2oZAxaOvItGkxElg/I+ApvKwaxFOp+5MrHQU4xUxh/n7xzgHTigzto9vwvcu keGj2vQXKmu0RD7T3ECxUJoFwtnSB9kpvjUjpAHDFybXZNJpMj11zS1rbtEwVTkG GUT733E4mNMo5qol+00= =06aK -END PGP SIGNATURE-
