Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22

2009-08-27 Thread Sebastian Pipping 
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> What's next
> ===
> Besides before-mentioned table the task
> 
>   Collect FEATURES variables in three sets (conf, defaults, globals),
>   not merged
>   http://soc.gentooexperimental.org/issues/show/58
> 
> is next on my list.

Done.

Previous test participants are welcome to re-submit as the data model
change has basically reset the data collected on the FEATURES variable.



Sebastian

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22

2009-08-21 Thread Sebastian Pipping 
Hello!


Arrivals

The third peport table on installed packages "most-unmasked" has just
arrived:

http://smolt.hartwork.org:45678/static/stats/gentoo.html#installed_packages_most_unmasked


Questions
=
Before adding the forth "least-installed" table, I'd like to take the
chance to ask for input from the treecleaner team, as it may be of most
 interest to you in the future.

 - Do you need anything that a dumb linear-with-counter approach
   cannot offer?

 - Would zero-install packages be more interesting than
   almost-zero ones or the other way around?


What's next
===
Besides before-mentioned table the task

  Collect FEATURES variables in three sets (conf, defaults, globals),
  not merged
  http://soc.gentooexperimental.org/issues/show/58

is next on my list.



Sebastian