Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Rethinking virtual/opencl and eselect-opencl

2020-04-06 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-04-06 06:27, Michał Górny wrote: > While at it, is there any chance to rewrite eselect-opencl so that it > stops writing into /usr and uses environment approach like eselect- > opengl does? I think I'd rather just nuke eselect-opencl altogether and force the use of an ICD loader for all

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Rethinking virtual/opencl and eselect-opencl

2020-04-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-04-05 at 22:13 +0100, Marek Szuba wrote: > On 2020-04-02 15:31, Marek Szuba wrote: > > > 3. Test if downstream applications are happy with the new unified OpenCL > > headers required by the Khronos Group ICD loader and if they are, add > > dev-libs/opencl-icd-loader to virtual/opencl

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Rethinking virtual/opencl and eselect-opencl

2020-04-05 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-04-02 15:31, Marek Szuba wrote: > 3. Test if downstream applications are happy with the new unified OpenCL > headers required by the Khronos Group ICD loader and if they are, add > dev-libs/opencl-icd-loader to virtual/opencl as an alternative to ocl-icd; Quick update on this: today I

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Rethinking virtual/opencl and eselect-opencl

2020-04-02 Thread Marek Szuba
(with many thanks to everyone who mulled on this problem in #gentoo-dev yesterday, mattst88 in particular) So, yesterday's attempt to begin phasing support for 32-bit OpenCL out of Gentoo (which, to remind everyone who may not have followed the earlier discussion, would essentially acknowledge