[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

2016-01-04 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Hi! > > > Better late then never. Posting 72 hours from now the earliest as > advised by GLEP 42. Feedback welcome as usual. Do you have any timeline in place for the change happening in tree

[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

2016-01-04 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:41 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> Hi! >> >> >> Better late then never. Posting 72 hours from now the earliest as >> advised by GLEP 42. Feedback welcome as usual. > > Do you have any timeline in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

2016-01-04 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/04/2016 09:41 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> Hi! > > Such a change should really be avoided if possible. Would it be > possible to have a conditional approach where either one can be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

2016-01-04 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/04/2016 02:30 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/04/2016 09:41 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >>> Hi! > > > > >> Such a change should really be avoided if possible. Would it be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

2016-01-04 Thread Brian Evans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/4/2016 3:41 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 01/04/2016 01:26 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> Hi! > > >> Better late then never. Posting 72 hours from now the earliest >> as advised by GLEP 42. Feedback welcome as usual. > > Do you have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

2016-01-04 Thread Peter Stuge
Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > Maybe I'm thinking things too difficult, why not just define both -D > PHP and -D PHP5 in the transition period and suggest this config for > any change? Because it mostly just defers the problem. If the desire is to move away from PHP5 then I would suggest to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: Apache "-D PHP5" needs update to "-D PHP"

2016-01-04 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > And while at it, in additional to news item, this should likely follow > a few version upgrades as elog messages before actually being > implemented anywhere > I don't want to be too prescriptive with the