Hi,
On 2019-02-25 17:09, Matthew Thode wrote:
> How about we allow a setting for controling which keyserver to refresh
> from. SKS has had problems, fedora has been better (and a coworker says
> MIT is ok too). Aparently they have a max key size set or something to
> work around keyserver
On 19-02-23 08:17:18, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 20:58 -0600, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > On 19-02-19 22:05:02, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:03:51 -0600
> > > Matthew Thode wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 19-02-20 00:00:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > > > > On 2/19/19
On 02/23/19 16:16, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-02-23 at 15:39 -0500, desultory wrote:
>> On 02/23/19 02:17, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 20:58 -0600, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 19-02-19 22:05:02, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:03:51 -0600
> Matthew
On Sat, 2019-02-23 at 15:39 -0500, desultory wrote:
> On 02/23/19 02:17, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 20:58 -0600, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > > On 19-02-19 22:05:02, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:03:51 -0600
> > > > Matthew Thode wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On
On 02/23/19 02:17, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 20:58 -0600, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> On 19-02-19 22:05:02, Brian Dolbec wrote:
>>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:03:51 -0600
>>> Matthew Thode wrote:
>>>
On 19-02-20 00:00:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 2/19/19 11:21 PM, Matthew
On 19-02-23 08:17:18, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 20:58 -0600, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > On 19-02-19 22:05:02, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:03:51 -0600
> > > Matthew Thode wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 19-02-20 00:00:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > > > > On 2/19/19
On Fri, 2019-02-22 at 20:58 -0600, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 19-02-19 22:05:02, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:03:51 -0600
> > Matthew Thode wrote:
> >
> > > On 19-02-20 00:00:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > > > On 2/19/19 11:21 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
On 19-02-22 22:19:54, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:58 PM Matthew Thode
> wrote:
> >
> > Ok, after setting that up portage wants to update pgp keys, which fail
> > because keyservers suck. It doesn't look like we can change the
> > keyservers or disable the update entirely but
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:58 PM Matthew Thode wrote:
>
> Ok, after setting that up portage wants to update pgp keys, which fail
> because keyservers suck. It doesn't look like we can change the
> keyservers or disable the update entirely but we can set the retries to
> 0 (which better disable
On 19-02-19 22:05:02, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:03:51 -0600
> Matthew Thode wrote:
>
> > On 19-02-20 00:00:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > > On 2/19/19 11:21 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> What problem would this solve? (Is adding gentoo-keys to @system
> > > >>
On 19-02-19 21:23:33, Matthew Thode wrote:
> As the title says, I think this should be done.
>
> First sync is impossible to verify without keys (webrsync)
> app-crypt/gentoo-keys has no dependencies, which help avoid some bloat
> in the base install.
>
> Let the bikeshedding begin.
>
Looks
On 19-02-19 22:05:02, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:03:51 -0600
> Matthew Thode wrote:
>
> > On 19-02-20 00:00:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > > On 2/19/19 11:21 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> What problem would this solve? (Is adding gentoo-keys to @system
> > > >>
On 19-02-20 08:35:10, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 21:23 -0600, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > As the title says, I think this should be done.
> >
> > First sync is impossible to verify without keys (webrsync)
> > app-crypt/gentoo-keys has no dependencies, which help avoid some bloat
> >
On Tue, 2019-02-19 at 21:23 -0600, Matthew Thode wrote:
> As the title says, I think this should be done.
>
> First sync is impossible to verify without keys (webrsync)
> app-crypt/gentoo-keys has no dependencies, which help avoid some bloat
> in the base install.
>
This is the wrong place to
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 23:03:51 -0600
Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 19-02-20 00:00:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > On 2/19/19 11:21 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > >>
> > >> What problem would this solve? (Is adding gentoo-keys to @system
> > >> the least bad way to solve it?)
> > >>
> > >
> > > It'd
On 19-02-20 00:00:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 2/19/19 11:21 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> >>
> >> What problem would this solve? (Is adding gentoo-keys to @system the
> >> least bad way to solve it?)
> >>
> >
> > It'd allow the stage tarballs (3,4) to use webrsync-gpg to verify
> > portage
On 2/19/19 11:21 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>>
>> What problem would this solve? (Is adding gentoo-keys to @system the
>> least bad way to solve it?)
>>
>
> It'd allow the stage tarballs (3,4) to use webrsync-gpg to verify
> portage tarballs. This is useful for the initial sync (as called out in
>
On 19-02-19 23:04:26, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 2/19/19 10:23 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > As the title says, I think this should be done.
> >
> > First sync is impossible to verify without keys (webrsync)
> > app-crypt/gentoo-keys has no dependencies, which help avoid some bloat
> > in the
On 2/19/19 10:23 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> As the title says, I think this should be done.
>
> First sync is impossible to verify without keys (webrsync)
> app-crypt/gentoo-keys has no dependencies, which help avoid some bloat
> in the base install.
>
> Let the bikeshedding begin.
>
I don't
As the title says, I think this should be done.
First sync is impossible to verify without keys (webrsync)
app-crypt/gentoo-keys has no dependencies, which help avoid some bloat
in the base install.
Let the bikeshedding begin.
--
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: PGP
20 matches
Mail list logo
