Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect modules

2005-09-04 Thread Bjarke Istrup Pedersen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Huddleston skrev: I've recently updated opengl-update to use the eselect framework. I think the team has done a great job as it was extremely easy to port the bash script to an eselect module. However, when I placed it in the portage

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect modules

2005-08-17 Thread Aaron Walker
Jeremy Huddleston wrote: I've recently updated opengl-update to use the eselect framework. I think the team has done a great job as it was extremely easy to port the bash script to an eselect module. However, when I placed it in the portage tree, it sparked a little bit of a policy discussion

[gentoo-dev] eselect modules

2005-08-16 Thread Jeremy Huddleston
I've recently updated opengl-update to use the eselect framework. I think the team has done a great job as it was extremely easy to port the bash script to an eselect module. However, when I placed it in the portage tree, it sparked a little bit of a policy discussion between myself and the core

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect modules

2005-08-16 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Huddleston wrote: | The eselect developers want to keep all eselect modules in their svn | repository and distributed through a single package (app-admin/eselect). | Their main reasons for this are better QA and less overhead for releases |

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect modules

2005-08-16 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 12:21 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jeremy Huddleston wrote: | The eselect developers want to keep all eselect modules in their svn | repository and distributed through a single package (app-admin/eselect). | Their main

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect modules

2005-08-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:38:08 -0400 Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | There's also the size issue. I use opengl-update on the LiveCD | builds, and have exactly zero need for *any* other eselect module, so | why should I be required to have them all to just get the one that I | need?

Re: [gentoo-dev] eselect modules

2005-08-16 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:52:25 +0200 Danny van Dyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | b) The possibility to change all modules in one move in case we change | ~ something like a default behaviour, or function names, etc. That kind of thing shouldn't happen once a stable release is out... -- Ciaran