Re: [gentoo-dev] moving bzip2 from local to global USE flag
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 10:16:06AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: ah, was not aware of said flag ... yes they should be unified ... Agreed. personally i think 'bzip2' is a bit more logical ... what do others think we should use ? just stick with bzlib since it's what we've had it for a while now ? I'd say always try to make things more logical. Besides, there are only a few packages using the bzlib flag. I did however find quite a few that did an unconditional --with-bzlib as well as one (dev-util/gambas) that uses bzlib2, which I can't find anywhere. Maurice. -- Maurice van der Pot Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com pgpOKxUBlgX1k.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] moving bzip2 from local to global USE flag
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 01:38 pm, Aron Griffis wrote: Vapier wrote: [Tue May 31 2005, 10:16:06AM EDT] personally i think 'bzip2' is a bit more logical ... what do others think we should use ? just stick with bzlib since it's what we've had it for a while now ? I'd prefer bzip2 the three packages using bzlib have been changed to bzip2 thanks all ... this is a good example of why we e-mail gentoo-dev before just doing stuff :) -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-dev] moving bzip2 from local to global USE flag
anyone have probs with moving bzip2 to global ? we currently utilize it in gnupg, xqf, mkvtoolnix, tar, and we could use it in portage in the future -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
