On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>> 1) there's barely any use for it,
>
> Well, I think that whoever use hardened barely use multilib.
For the value of one anecdote, I'm a long-time hardened user and all
of my hardened systems are no-multilib.
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 16:13:47 -0500
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if anything is using that particular profile. I tried to
> create a new subprofile myself,
>
> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/ab7ef753aa88f21c8a05d667cf511a24
>
> and wound up (indirectly) using arch
On 2 December 2017 at 23:08, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> W dniu sob, 02.12.2017 o godzinie 22∶43 +0200, użytkownik Alon Bar-Lev
> napisał:
> > Hi,
> > Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> > I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
> >
>
> One reason might be that:
On 12/02/2017 03:43 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hi,
> Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
> Thanks,
> Alon
>
> [1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib
>
I'm not sure if anything is using that particular profile
W dniu sob, 02.12.2017 o godzinie 22∶43 +0200, użytkownik Alon Bar-Lev
napisał:
> Hi,
> Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
>
One reason might be that:
1) there's barely any use for it,
2) we have too many profiles,
Am Samstag, 2. Dezember 2017, 21:43:53 CET schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
> Hi,
> Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
> I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
> Thanks,
> Alon
>
> [1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib
Hi,
one of the devs said in #gentoo-ha
Hi,
Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib?
I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added.
Thanks,
Alon
[1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib
