On 07/12/2010 12:56 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
I remember very clearly as you and I were both council members at the
time. My point is that this discussion does not need to even happen
and the council shouldn't even remotely be involved here.
I assumed the best way to change policy would be
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/12/2010 12:56 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
I remember very clearly as you and I were both council members at the
time. My point is that this discussion does not need to even happen
and the council shouldn't even
On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
If I really need to go to the council with every change, considering
it must be debated on the ML for at least X number of days prior to
going to the council, I'd more likely just remove MythTV from the tree
and maintain it in an overlay. I don't
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
If I really need to go to the council with every change, considering
it must be debated on the ML for at least X number of days prior to
going to the council, I'd more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug.
On 11-07-2010 16:03, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
If I really need to go to the council with every change, considering
it
On 07/11/2010 07:37 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Simply put, the council's purpose is not to say oh we have to stop
development and have a 4 week debate about everything minor. The
council's purpose is to help decide between different technical
solutions and encourage people to
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 07:47:24PM +0300, Petteri RRRty wrote:
On 07/11/2010 07:37 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Simply put, the council's purpose is not to say oh we have to stop
development and have a 4 week debate about everything minor. The
council's purpose is to help
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug.
On 11-07-2010 16:03, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/11/2010 08:02 AM,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11-07-2010 21:56, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug.
Jorge,
I remember very clearly as you and I were
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jul 2010 01:34:37 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 09:30:42AM +0300, Petteri RRRty wrote:
The standing policy is still not to remove any public functionality from
10 matches
Mail list logo
