Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.5.20050110-r1 for stable
Francesco Riosa wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 10 April 2005 05:22 pm, Spider wrote: the ~x86 version doesn't exhibit this problem, btw. stabilizing this version might be prudent. 1.5.14 doesnt have any open issues for it so i've pushed it to stable emerge -pv gcc [ebuild U ] sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1 [3.3.5-r1] (-altivec) -bootstrap -boundschecking -build -debug -fortran -gcj -gtk -hardened (-ip28) (-multilib) -multislot (-n32) (-n64) +nls -nocxx -objc -static (-uclibc) 0 kB [...] * Configuring GCC with: --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.3.5-20050130 --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5-20050130/include --datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5-20050130 --mandir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5-20050130/man --infodir=/usr/share/gcc-data/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5-20050130/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3.5-20050130/include/g++-v3 --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --disable-altivec --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --with-system-zlib --disable-checking --disable-werror --disable-libunwind-exceptions --disable-multilib --disable-libgcj --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu *** This configuration is not supported in the following subdirectories: target-libffi target-boehm-gc target-zlib target-libjava target-libf2c zlib fastjar target-libobjc (Any other directories should still work fine.) Created Makefile in /var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1/work/build using mt-frag gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such file or directory *** The command 'gcc -o conftest -O2 -march=i686 conftest.c' failed. *** You must set the environment variable CC to a working compiler. !!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1 failed. !!! Function gcc_do_configure, Line 1048, Exitcode 1 !!! failed to run configure !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. and this are the packages emerged few seconds before (gmt times) Mon Apr 11 10:27:19 2005 sys-apps/texinfo-4.8 Mon Apr 11 10:27:43 2005 sys-devel/gcc-config-1.3.10-r2 Mon Apr 11 10:27:56 2005 sys-devel/binutils-config-1.8-r2 Mon Apr 11 10:37:17 2005 sys-devel/binutils-2.15.92.0.2-r7 can anyone explain me why updating this fundamentals packages is so fragile also on a *stable* x86 installation ? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.5.20050110-r1 for stable
On Monday 11 April 2005 07:24 am, Francesco Riosa wrote: gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `as': No such file or directory run `binutils-config 1` there's a bug open atm where portage doesnt seem to run pkg_postinst() for some reason and thus when you upgrade your binutils, the proper symlinks arent installed automatically -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.5.20050110-r1 for stable
Should I *not* emerge this gcc? I usually hold off on gcc updates when I'm in the middle of other testing. Right now, I'm doing a lot of beta testing with R and Atlas, so I held off when the latest gcc showed up after emerge sync. Spider wrote: On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 16:22 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sunday 10 April 2005 11:31 am, Spider wrote: A touch late, but this uncovered a bug in libtool. re-emerge libtool and it'll fix itself Yep, I know that. Unfortunately, thats -not- going to be a solution for the people who just installed 2005.0, got a gcc update and suddenly everything broke. the ~x86 version doesn't exhibit this problem, btw. stabilizing this version might be prudent. //Spider -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.5.20050110-r1 for stable
One thing... Maybe its just me... or maybe they are in no way related, but I seem to have heard of a lot more 'libtool' problems when using a snapshot version instead of a regularly numbered version, is there a reason? On Apr 7, 2005 11:46 PM, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can stable uses of gcc-3.3.5-r1 upgrade to gcc-3.3.5.20050110-r1 and see if they hit any fun and exciting bugs ? if not i'd like to move this to stable this weekend -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-3.3.5.20050110-r1 for stable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote: can stable uses of gcc-3.3.5-r1 upgrade to gcc-3.3.5.20050110-r1 and see if they hit any fun and exciting bugs ? Uh, there isn't any such thing. If you mean this: Mon Mar 21 14:05:58 2005 sys-devel/gcc-3.3.5.20050130-r1 it's been stable on sparc for 2.5 weeks. Or did you mean this instead? gcc-3.4.3.20050110-r1 if not i'd like to move this to stable this weekend -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list Regards, Ferris - -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCVmx6Qa6M3+I///cRAsAoAKDiytqoV6v+6rqTucJVkPTBvgzgrQCfXhM0 QQlUcYo9Ti3z08i8gfwbzqc= =tL0p -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list