On Thu, 17 May 2007 13:12:01 +0200
Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had the 'stricter' FEATURE turned on for some time and found that
many packages failed due to the QA notice regarding poor programming
practices. I filed a few bugs for this but have not gotten a lot of
response,
Hi,
I've had the 'stricter' FEATURE turned on for some time and found that
many packages failed due to the QA notice regarding poor programming
practices. I filed a few bugs for this but have not gotten a lot of
response, or the suggestion to talk to upstream. Obviously the latter is
always a
On Thu, 17 May 2007 13:12:01 +0200
Hans de Graaff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My view is that if this is a QA notice then, if a package doesn't
emerge because of it, it is a Gentoo QA bug and package maintainers
should be responsible for fixing it.
Gentoo should not be applying patches simply to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans de Graaff wrote:
If the notice is only informational, then the emerge process should not
be stopped because of it (and this would mean that it is nice to fix
these issues but not mandatory).
If you disable stricter in FEATURES, you'll still
