Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP78] Updating specification r2

2021-09-23 Thread Sheng Yu
Hi Ulrich, Sorry, I don't know why the response I sent on September 13 didn't get forward by mailing list. So I write here again. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, September 23rd, 2021 at 06:30, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Since you haven't addressed my comments from the first round

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP78] Updating specification r2

2021-09-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 23 Sep 2021, Sheng Yu wrote: > Hi, > I attached second revision of the new draft of GLEP78 "Gentoo Binary > Package Container Format" > Please feel free to give any comments and suggestions. Since you haven't addressed my comments from the first round of review, I repeat them

[gentoo-dev] [GLEP78] Updating specification r2

2021-09-22 Thread Sheng Yu
Hi, I attached second revision of the new draft of GLEP78 "Gentoo Binary Package Container Format" Please feel free to give any comments and suggestions. Thanks, Sheng Yu--- GLEP: 78 Title: Gentoo binary package container format Author: Michał Górny Sheng Yu Type: Standards Track

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP78] Updating specification

2021-09-13 Thread Sheng Yu
On Monday, September 13th, 2021 at 18:04, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:02 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 12:08 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > Also, IIRC one of the goals of the format was to allow partial > > > download > > > of metadata. That

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP78] Updating specification

2021-09-13 Thread Sheng Yu
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, September 13th, 2021 at 17:02, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 12:08 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Sep 2021, Sheng Yu wrote: > > > > > -The archive contains a number of files, stored in a single > > > directory > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP78] Updating specification

2021-09-13 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:02 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 12:08 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > Also, IIRC one of the goals of the format was to allow partial > > download > > of metadata. That will only work if the Manifest file will be the > > first > > file in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP78] Updating specification

2021-09-13 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 12:08 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Sep 2021, Sheng Yu wrote: > > > -The archive contains a number of files, stored in a single > > directory > > -whose name should match the basename of the package file. However, > > -the implementation must be able

[gentoo-dev] [GLEP78] Updating specification

2021-09-13 Thread Sheng Yu
Hi, We are updating the draft of GLEP78 "Gentoo Binary Package Container Format" to address some security issues, and included some new designs for this purpose. The new draft and the difference version from the old one are attached. Please feel free to give any comments and suggestions.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP78] Updating specification

2021-09-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2021, Sheng Yu wrote: > -The archive contains a number of files, stored in a single directory > -whose name should match the basename of the package file. However, > -the implementation must be able to process an archive where > -the directory name is mismatched. There