Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Have x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers use an ICD loader

2020-04-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 5:14 AM Marek Szuba wrote: > > On 2020-04-20 06:13, Joonas Niilola wrote: > > > He has been on devaway for a while. > > > > I would've much rather seen the differences between -r0 -r1 ebuilds to > > focus on what is actually done there. Not that I have any say what will >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Have x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers use an ICD loader

2020-04-20 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-04-20 06:13, Joonas Niilola wrote: > He has been on devaway for a while. > > I would've much rather seen the differences between -r0 -r1 ebuilds to > focus on what is actually done there. Not that I have any say what will > be done in the end, but it's easier for the eyes... Indeed,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Have x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers use an ICD loader

2020-04-19 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 4/19/20 11:40 PM, Marek Szuba wrote: > As previously mentioned, x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers is the last OpenCL > runtime we have got in the tree to be migrated to the "must use an ICD > loader" approach to virtual/opencl. Unfortunately I have so far failed > to reach the maintainer of this

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Have x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers use an ICD loader

2020-04-19 Thread Marek Szuba
As previously mentioned, x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers is the last OpenCL runtime we have got in the tree to be migrated to the "must use an ICD loader" approach to virtual/opencl. Unfortunately I have so far failed to reach the maintainer of this package (jer) by either e-mail, Bugzilla, or IRC - so