El jue, 20-11-2014 a las 23:04 +0100, Michał Górny escribió:
[...]
Here's how games-r1 would look like. However, now that I think about it,
it may be actually useful to commit such an eclass. Otherwise people
will keep thinking games.eclass is the way to go.
Why isn't games.eclass deprecated
El vie, 21-11-2014 a las 11:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El jue, 20-11-2014 a las 23:04 +0100, Michał Górny escribió:
[...]
Here's how games-r1 would look like. However, now that I think about it,
it may be actually useful to commit such an eclass. Otherwise people
will keep thinking
On 11/21/2014 11:04 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El vie, 21-11-2014 a las 11:03 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El jue, 20-11-2014 a las 23:04 +0100, Michał Górny escribió:
[...]
Here's how games-r1 would look like. However, now that I think about it,
it may be actually useful to commit such an
On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote:
There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it
as well, so I don't see a reason to push into that direction.
The main thing is that you cannot turn off all the permission stuff in
the eclass whether you like it or not. Changing the
El vie, 21-11-2014 a las 10:10 -0500, Tim Harder escribió:
On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote:
There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it
as well, so I don't see a reason to push into that direction.
The main thing is that you cannot turn off all the
On 11/21/2014 04:10 PM, Tim Harder wrote:
On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote:
There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it
as well, so I don't see a reason to push into that direction.
The main thing is that you cannot turn off all the permission stuff in
the
On 2014-11-21 10:31, hasufell wrote:
Are you serious?
Instead of creating random competing concepts in one repository we
should rather enhance configuration options, so that the USER can choose
what he likes instead of the developer.
I think this is a very bad idea.
If we all decide to
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:31 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/21/2014 04:10 PM, Tim Harder wrote:
On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote:
There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it
as well, so I don't see a reason to push into that direction.
The main
On 11/21/2014 10:08 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:31 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/21/2014 04:10 PM, Tim Harder wrote:
On 2014-11-21 09:54, hasufell wrote:
There are users who seem to like it and the games team wants to keep it
as well, so I don't see a
From: Julian Ospald hasuf...@gentoo.org
Date: Thu Nov 20 17:04:20 UTC 2014
Subject: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386
This also removes unnecessary exports of games
variables.
--- eclass/games.eclass
+++ eclass/games.eclass
@@ -19,25 +19,46 @@
*) die no
I am running this since ~4 months straight without any problems.
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, hasufell wrote:
From: Julian Ospald hasuf...@gentoo.org
Date: Thu Nov 20 17:04:20 UTC 2014
Subject: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386
This also removes unnecessary exports of games
variables.
Wouldn't it be saner to have a new games-r1.eclass
On 11/20/2014 06:49 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, hasufell wrote:
From: Julian Ospald hasuf...@gentoo.org
Date: Thu Nov 20 17:04:20 UTC 2014
Subject: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386
This also removes unnecessary exports of games
variables.
Dnia 2014-11-20, o godz. 18:49:25
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, hasufell wrote:
From: Julian Ospald hasuf...@gentoo.org
Date: Thu Nov 20 17:04:20 UTC 2014
Subject: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386
This also removes unnecessary
14 matches
Mail list logo
