Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0068: Add new element

2020-09-16 Thread Jaco Kroon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On 2020/09/16 11:39, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 11:13 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote: >> >>> +- at most one element containing version >>> +  constraints used to determine stabilization candidates, as detailed >>> +  in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0068: Add new element

2020-09-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 11:13 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi Michał, > > Thanks for your efforts. This looks interesting at the very least, and > whilst in many cases on posts on this ML I'm on the "don't care" stance, > this one looks like it could solve some problems for me. > net-misc/asterisk

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0068: Add new element

2020-09-16 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi Michał, Thanks for your efforts.  This looks interesting at the very least, and whilst in many cases on posts on this ML I'm on the "don't care" stance, this one looks like it could solve some problems for me.  net-misc/asterisk + friends will definitely make use of this. Two nitpicks below

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0068: Add new element

2020-09-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 10:26 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > > It has two advantages: > > 1. It reduces the risk of accidentally leaving it in the stable ebuild. > > Huh, you mean you would remove the PROPERTIES token again, after the > version

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0068: Add new element

2020-09-16 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > It has two advantages: > 1. It reduces the risk of accidentally leaving it in the stable ebuild. Huh, you mean you would remove the PROPERTIES token again, after the version has been stabilised? Why? Ebuilds could do conditionals like this

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0068: Add new element

2020-09-16 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2020-09-16 at 08:18 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > > > +- one or more elements, each containing a version > > + constraint in the format matching EAPI 0 dependency specification > > + with the package category and name parts

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0068: Add new element

2020-09-16 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > +- one or more elements, each containing a version > + constraint in the format matching EAPI 0 dependency specification > + with the package category and name parts omitted, e.g. ``<1.7``. That's not a very powerful syntax, so unless I

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] glep-0068: Add new element

2020-09-15 Thread Michał Górny
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0068.rst | 62 --- 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/glep-0068.rst b/glep-0068.rst index d8fc379..5b7e2b9 100644 --- a/glep-0068.rst +++ b/glep-0068.rst @@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ Title: