Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 07/10] glep-0072: Combine and amend description of states

2020-04-10 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 13:42 +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > > > "Developers should file stabilization requests, however, pending > > > stabilization on these arches alone cannot block any further steps (as, > > > e.g., cleanup of old versions)." > > > > Isn't that implied by exp status, i.e.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 07/10] glep-0072: Combine and amend description of states

2020-04-10 Thread Andreas K . Hüttel
> > "Developers should file stabilization requests, however, pending > > stabilization on these arches alone cannot block any further steps (as, > > e.g., cleanup of old versions)." > > Isn't that implied by exp status, i.e. separate from this? Hmm... do all "degraded" profiles have to be "exp"?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 07/10] glep-0072: Combine and amend description of states

2020-04-10 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2020-04-10 at 13:23 +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > Am Freitag, 10. April 2020, 09:58:44 EEST schrieb Michał Górny: > > > Developers are not expected to file > > stabilization +requests. > > This kinda changed in usage in the meantime (for, say, stuff like sparc and > s390). The

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 07/10] glep-0072: Combine and amend description of states

2020-04-10 Thread Andreas K . Hüttel
Am Freitag, 10. April 2020, 09:58:44 EEST schrieb Michał Górny: > Developers are not expected to file > stabilization +requests. This kinda changed in usage in the meantime (for, say, stuff like sparc and s390). The request was to CC them in the stabilization bugs if relevant. How about

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 07/10] glep-0072: Combine and amend description of states

2020-04-10 Thread Michał Górny
Provide a combined description for every status that explains what it means, how it's used by linting tools and how it affects stabilization requests. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0072.rst | 46 +++--- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27