From: Michael Orlitzky <m...@gentoo.org>

The ChangeLog section under misc-files is misleading now that our main
repository has been switched to git (and we no longer have
ChangeLogs). Remove the ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog page.

X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485314
---
 ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/text.xml | 111 ---------------------------
 ebuild-writing/misc-files/text.xml           |   1 -
 2 files changed, 112 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/text.xml 
b/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/text.xml
deleted file mode 100644
index ff68e11..0000000
--- a/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/text.xml
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,111 +0,0 @@
-<?xml version="1.0"?>
-<guide self="ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/">
-<chapter>
-<title>ChangeLog</title>
-
-<body>
-<p>
-The <c>ChangeLog</c> must be updated with each commit. The
-<uri link="::tools-reference/echangelog/">echangelog tool</uri> should be used 
to create <c>ChangeLog</c> entries;
-the format of a <c>ChangeLog</c> is now defined as "whatever
-<c>echangelog</c> creates".
-</p>
-
-<p>
-You should include references to any relevant bugs. The standard
-format for doing this is via the phrase <c>bug #20600</c> — this
-format (with the hash sign included) is recognised via
-<uri link="https://packages.gentoo.org";>packages.gentoo.org</uri> and
-similar tools. When including user-submitted ebuilds or patches, you
-should credit the user with their full name and email address (or
-whatever they use to identify themselves on bugzilla <d/> some users
-prefer to be known only by a nickname).
-</p>
-
-<p>
-If you are changing keywords, make sure you clearly state what
-keywords you add or remove. "Marked stable" is a nuisance for
-architecture teams, even if there was only one keyword in the ebuild
-at the time. "Stable on all archs" isn't generally any better (and
-should you really be stabling on all archs?) — do you mean "all", or
-"all the ones that are currently keyworded"? A list like "x86 sparc
-mips" is much more useful.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-A typical <c>ChangeLog</c> snippet might look like the following:
-</p>
-
-<pre>
-    *vim-6.3.068 (25 Mar 2005)
-
-      25 Mar 2005; Ciaran McCreesh &lt;ciar...@gentoo.org&gt; 
+vim-6.3.068.ebuild:
-      New release. Fixes bug #79981, bug #81289, bug #83383, bug #83416, bug
-      #83565, bug #85758, upstream patches up to 6.3.068.
-
-      22 Mar 2005; Aron Griffis &lt;agrif...@gentoo.org&gt; vim-6.3-r4.ebuild:
-      Stable on alpha
-</pre>
-
-<note>
-If a <c>ChangeLog</c> file is not present in your current working directory,
-then you should write a <c>ChangeLog</c> entry in the parent's directory
-<c>ChangeLog</c> file.
-</note>
-
-<section>
-<title>Writing correct ChangeLog messages</title>
-<body>
-<note>
-It is <b>very</b> important that your <c>cvs commit</c> messages are
-also informative to aid the QA team or architecture teams as well as
-other developers if they are trying to troubleshoot issues which are
-known to not have occured in previous versions of ebuilds, for
-example. If your ChangeLog message is concise there is usually nothing
-wrong with using it as the <c>cvs commit</c> message.
-</note>
-
-<p>
-Your message should explain what specifically you changed and, if
-relevant, why. You don't need to write an essay or even a complete
-sentence (<c>ChangeLog</c> messages, however, are required to be in
-'proper' English so no <c>fixed that bug kthx Bob</c> messages —
-please do use punctuation), so long as it is easily understandable and
-(preferably) greppable. Bad and good examples, all of which are based
-upon real messages:
-</p>
-
-<ul>
-  <li><b>BAD:</b> Changed keywords</li>
-  <li><e>GOOD:</e> Added ~x86 keyword</li>
-</ul>
-
-<ul>
-  <li><b>BAD:</b> Stable</li>
-  <li><e>GOOD:</e> Stable on x86, sparc, mips</li>
-</ul>
-
-<ul>
-  <li><b>BAD:</b> Fix stuff</li>
-  <li><e>GOOD:</e> Fix USE=foo logic error</li>
-</ul>
-
-<ul>
-  <li><b>BAD:</b> .</li>
-  <li><e>GOOD:</e> Purge old ebuilds</li>
-</ul>
-
-<ul>
-  <li>
-    <b>BAD:</b> Who the fuck reads this anyway? (<b>Editor's note</b>:
-    No, seriously, this is a genuine example. Do <e>not</e> do
-    this...)
-  </li>
-  <li><e>GOOD:</e> Version bump to 0.5.1.</li>
-</ul>
-
-</body>
-</section>
-</body>
-</chapter>
-</guide>
diff --git a/ebuild-writing/misc-files/text.xml 
b/ebuild-writing/misc-files/text.xml
index 31f1421..416070b 100644
--- a/ebuild-writing/misc-files/text.xml
+++ b/ebuild-writing/misc-files/text.xml
@@ -18,6 +18,5 @@ This section contains some notes on various miscellaneous 
files.
 </chapter>
 
 <include href="metadata/"/>
-<include href="changelog/"/>
 <include href="patches/"/>
 </guide>
-- 
2.4.10


Reply via email to