Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing?

2013-04-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello everyone Attached you will find the various changes I plan to apply to kernel-2.eclass after a week if there are no objections, feel free to take a look at them. A summary of the changes: - Added a warning after

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing?

2013-04-13 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sat, 13 Apr 2013 08:03:22 +0100 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: Why? Because people (eg. you) use the undocumented variable KERNEL_BASE_URI. Just to annoy people who have successfully used kernel-2.eclass until now, and in my case for half a decade (or even more)? If you use an

[gentoo-dev] [PATCHES] kernel-2.eclass: Various changes requested by users. + [STABLEREQ?] sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-3.8.7: Any objections against stabilizing?

2013-04-12 Thread Tom Wijsman
Hello everyone Attached you will find the various changes I plan to apply to kernel-2.eclass after a week if there are no objections, feel free to take a look at them. A summary of the changes: - Added a warning after the variables that modifying other variables in the eclass is not