Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] [PATCH] dev-util/shadowman: Unified tool to update ccache/distcc/icecc shadow dir
On 19.08.2017 12:53, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 19 sierpnia 2017 12:19:18 CEST, "Manuel Rüger" > napisał(a): >> On 17.08.2017 10:36, Michał Górny wrote: >>> Hi, everyone. >>> >>> I've written a new tool called shadowman [1] that aims to partially >>> replace the current *-config tools shipped with ccache, distcc, icecc >>> and potentially more. >>> >>> Why? Because the existing tools are inconsistent, inconvenient >>> and usually incomplete. The README [2] states a number of advantages: >>> >>> | 1. one usage syntax that works for all tools, >>> | >>> | 2. ability to update/clean masquerades for multiple tools in one >> call, >>> | >>> | 3. consistent (and *good*) implementation -- now all tools get the >> same >>> | executable list, >>> | >>> | 4. reduced code duplication, >>> | >>> | 5. modular layout that allows adding extra tools/compiler wildcards >>> | by third-party packages. >>> >>> This thread includes patches that: >>> >>> a. add the package for shadowman (skipping some bundled modules for >>> external inclusion) -- for testing it's just a live ebuild with full >>> keyword set; I will obviously change that before the final inclusion; >>> >>> b. adds shadowman support to ccache, distcc & icecream packages >>> (preserving the old utilities for compatibility), >>> >>> c. adds shadowman update call to toolchain.eclass & clang ebuilds >>> so that the masquerades get updated automatically on gcc/clang >> upgrade. >>> >>> Please review. Alternatively available as PR on GitHub [3]. >>> >>> [1]:https://github.com/mgorny/shadowman >>> [2]:https://github.com/mgorny/shadowman/blob/master/README >>> [3]:https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/5386 >>> >>> >> Have you considered moving it under the gentoo umbrella (e.g., mirror >> it >> on git.gentoo.org or move it to the gentoo organisation)? > > No, I'm not interested in giving away credit to my personal work which I'm > personally maintaining. > Why do you consider it to "give away credit" when it's under github.org/gentoo/ or on git.gentoo.org? You'll still be author of the commits. >> >> Thanks, >> Manuel > >
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] [PATCH] dev-util/shadowman: Unified tool to update ccache/distcc/icecc shadow dir
Dnia 19 sierpnia 2017 12:19:18 CEST, "Manuel Rüger" napisał(a): >On 17.08.2017 10:36, Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, everyone. >> >> I've written a new tool called shadowman [1] that aims to partially >> replace the current *-config tools shipped with ccache, distcc, icecc >> and potentially more. >> >> Why? Because the existing tools are inconsistent, inconvenient >> and usually incomplete. The README [2] states a number of advantages: >> >> | 1. one usage syntax that works for all tools, >> | >> | 2. ability to update/clean masquerades for multiple tools in one >call, >> | >> | 3. consistent (and *good*) implementation -- now all tools get the >same >> | executable list, >> | >> | 4. reduced code duplication, >> | >> | 5. modular layout that allows adding extra tools/compiler wildcards >> | by third-party packages. >> >> This thread includes patches that: >> >> a. add the package for shadowman (skipping some bundled modules for >> external inclusion) -- for testing it's just a live ebuild with full >> keyword set; I will obviously change that before the final inclusion; >> >> b. adds shadowman support to ccache, distcc & icecream packages >> (preserving the old utilities for compatibility), >> >> c. adds shadowman update call to toolchain.eclass & clang ebuilds >> so that the masquerades get updated automatically on gcc/clang >upgrade. >> >> Please review. Alternatively available as PR on GitHub [3]. >> >> [1]:https://github.com/mgorny/shadowman >> [2]:https://github.com/mgorny/shadowman/blob/master/README >> [3]:https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/5386 >> >> >Have you considered moving it under the gentoo umbrella (e.g., mirror >it >on git.gentoo.org or move it to the gentoo organisation)? No, I'm not interested in giving away credit to my personal work which I'm personally maintaining. > >Thanks, >Manuel -- Best regards, Michał Górny (by phone)
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] [PATCH] dev-util/shadowman: Unified tool to update ccache/distcc/icecc shadow dir
On 17.08.2017 10:36, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've written a new tool called shadowman [1] that aims to partially > replace the current *-config tools shipped with ccache, distcc, icecc > and potentially more. > > Why? Because the existing tools are inconsistent, inconvenient > and usually incomplete. The README [2] states a number of advantages: > > | 1. one usage syntax that works for all tools, > | > | 2. ability to update/clean masquerades for multiple tools in one call, > | > | 3. consistent (and *good*) implementation -- now all tools get the same > | executable list, > | > | 4. reduced code duplication, > | > | 5. modular layout that allows adding extra tools/compiler wildcards > | by third-party packages. > > This thread includes patches that: > > a. add the package for shadowman (skipping some bundled modules for > external inclusion) -- for testing it's just a live ebuild with full > keyword set; I will obviously change that before the final inclusion; > > b. adds shadowman support to ccache, distcc & icecream packages > (preserving the old utilities for compatibility), > > c. adds shadowman update call to toolchain.eclass & clang ebuilds > so that the masquerades get updated automatically on gcc/clang upgrade. > > Please review. Alternatively available as PR on GitHub [3]. > > [1]:https://github.com/mgorny/shadowman > [2]:https://github.com/mgorny/shadowman/blob/master/README > [3]:https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/5386 > > Have you considered moving it under the gentoo umbrella (e.g., mirror it on git.gentoo.org or move it to the gentoo organisation)? Thanks, Manuel
[gentoo-dev] [RFC] [PATCH] dev-util/shadowman: Unified tool to update ccache/distcc/icecc shadow dir
Hi, everyone. I've written a new tool called shadowman [1] that aims to partially replace the current *-config tools shipped with ccache, distcc, icecc and potentially more. Why? Because the existing tools are inconsistent, inconvenient and usually incomplete. The README [2] states a number of advantages: | 1. one usage syntax that works for all tools, | | 2. ability to update/clean masquerades for multiple tools in one call, | | 3. consistent (and *good*) implementation -- now all tools get the same | executable list, | | 4. reduced code duplication, | | 5. modular layout that allows adding extra tools/compiler wildcards | by third-party packages. This thread includes patches that: a. add the package for shadowman (skipping some bundled modules for external inclusion) -- for testing it's just a live ebuild with full keyword set; I will obviously change that before the final inclusion; b. adds shadowman support to ccache, distcc & icecream packages (preserving the old utilities for compatibility), c. adds shadowman update call to toolchain.eclass & clang ebuilds so that the masquerades get updated automatically on gcc/clang upgrade. Please review. Alternatively available as PR on GitHub [3]. [1]:https://github.com/mgorny/shadowman [2]:https://github.com/mgorny/shadowman/blob/master/README [3]:https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/5386
