Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-26 Thread Samuel Bernardo
On 5/22/20 9:08 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed > in bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain > the default? Do you think it is worthwhile to continue supporting it? In my Gentoo maintenance scripts I'm using

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-24 Thread Peter Stuge
Michał Górny wrote: > Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed > in bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain > the default? Do you think it is worthwhile to continue supporting it? I continue to use LILO because simpler and more mature code is good,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2020-05-23 at 08:48 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 22 May 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed in > > bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain the > > default? Do you think it is worthwhile to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 22 May 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > Hence my question: do you find 'do not remove kernels listed in > bootloader config' feature useful? Do you think it should remain the > default? Do you think it is worthwhile to continue supporting it? For GRUB, wouldn't the typical workflow

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-23 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Friday, May 22, 2020, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've finally found some time to revive eclean-kernel, and I'm having > some doubts about the way bootloaders are used (in ek1). I'd like to > hear your opinion on whether the old behavior should be kept or removed > in favor of

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Bootloader use in eclean-kernel

2020-05-22 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, everyone. I've finally found some time to revive eclean-kernel, and I'm having some doubts about the way bootloaders are used (in ek1). I'd like to hear your opinion on whether the old behavior should be kept or removed in favor of more-like-ek2 behavior. Originally, ek1 assumed that we