Hi,
this is actually a fork of the HDEPEND thread (sorry for having
diverged that much there).
As I wrote in the other thread, the problem with PDEPEND is that there
are two (or more) semantics:
- PDEPENDs used as suggestions but yet being considered in the
depgraph and actually installed.
On 09/02/2012 04:45 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
Hi,
this is actually a fork of the HDEPEND thread (sorry for having
diverged that much there).
As I wrote in the other thread, the problem with PDEPEND is that there
are two (or more) semantics:
- PDEPENDs used as suggestions but yet being
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 4:57 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Why not introduce a global useflag such as suggested-deps which
complies with GLEP 62 meaning it will be in IUSE_RUNTIME.
How do you manage to fix the PDEPEND identity disorder problem then?
Teaching devs to move to GLEP 62
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 16:45:12 +0200
Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
this is actually a fork of the HDEPEND thread (sorry for having
diverged that much there).
As I wrote in the other thread, the problem with PDEPEND is that there
are two (or more) semantics:
- PDEPENDs used as
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:09:22 +0200
Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 4:57 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Why not introduce a global useflag such as suggested-deps which
complies with GLEP 62 meaning it will be in IUSE_RUNTIME.
How do you manage
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:09:22 +0200
Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 4:57 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Why not introduce a global useflag such as suggested-deps which
complies
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:51:00 +0200
Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:09:22 +0200
Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 4:57 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:23:40 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
An effective SDEPEND implementation is definitely nowhere close
to simple. Nor is presenting those dependencies to users.
Indeed it's not, but we *do* have a reference implementation and lots
of practical experience with
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
and we have worked out all the difficulties.
Please elaborate. What difficulties? What did you implement other than
plain SDEPEND? With what features? Lots of detail missing.
Having said that, if we're going
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:46:19 +0200
Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
and we have worked out all the difficulties.
Please elaborate. What difficulties? What did you implement other than
plain SDEPEND?
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:08:33 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:23:40 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
An effective SDEPEND implementation is definitely nowhere close
to simple. Nor is presenting those dependencies to users.
Indeed
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:07:30 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:08:33 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:23:40 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
An effective SDEPEND implementation is definitely nowhere
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:46:19 +0200
Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
and we have worked out all the difficulties.
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:10:38 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:07:30 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:08:33 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:23:40 +0200
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 21:38:26 +0200
Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012 20:46:19 +0200
Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
s/with/on/
--
Fabio Erculiani
16 matches
Mail list logo
