Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?

2016-05-30 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sun, 29 May 2016 14:58:03 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 21 May 2016 11:19:07 -0400 > waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote > > > > > I see the following possibilities: > > > > > > 1. We start explicitly listing linguas_* in all

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?

2016-05-29 Thread waltdnes
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 02:58:03PM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote > On Sat, 21 May 2016 11:19:07 -0400 > waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > > > 5. An reversed variant of INSTALL_MASK in make.conf, e.g. > > LOCALE_ALLOW="foo bar fubar" > > > > which would block installing files in /usr/share/locale/* and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?

2016-05-29 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 21 May 2016 20:14:46 +1200 Kent Fredric wrote: > On 21 May 2016 at 19:41, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > Those of you who read my blog post on LINGUAS [1] may already know > > what's going on. For those who didn't, short summary: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?

2016-05-29 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 21 May 2016 11:19:07 -0400 waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote > > > I see the following possibilities: > > > > 1. We start explicitly listing linguas_* in all ebuilds, no matter how > > tiny they are. Maintainers are required to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?

2016-05-29 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 27 May 2016 10:17:20 +0300 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Ühel kenal päeval, L, 21.05.2016 kell 11:19, kirjutas > waltd...@waltdnes.org: > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote > > > 3. We remove LINGUAS from USE_EXPAND and stop using it. If ebuilds >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?

2016-05-27 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 21.05.2016 kell 11:19, kirjutas waltd...@waltdnes.org: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote > > 3. We remove LINGUAS from USE_EXPAND and stop using it. If ebuilds > > have > > a good reason to use flags for localization, we introduce a new, > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?

2016-05-21 Thread waltdnes
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:41:28AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote > I see the following possibilities: > > 1. We start explicitly listing linguas_* in all ebuilds, no matter how > tiny they are. Maintainers are required to keep IUSE up-to-date > and users are forced to rebuild a lot. This is also a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?

2016-05-21 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 05/21/2016 03:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > I see the following possibilities: > #2 is ugly and requires a special case due to a bad choice of variable name; #4 will never work. > 3. We remove LINGUAS from USE_EXPAND and stop using it. If ebuilds have > a good reason to use flags for

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?

2016-05-21 Thread Kent Fredric
On 21 May 2016 at 19:41, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > > Those of you who read my blog post on LINGUAS [1] may already know > what's going on. For those who didn't, short summary: > > In EAPI 5 and newer, all variables listed in USE_EXPAND are supposed to > be

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] How to deal with LINGUAS mess?

2016-05-21 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, Those of you who read my blog post on LINGUAS [1] may already know what's going on. For those who didn't, short summary: In EAPI 5 and newer, all variables listed in USE_EXPAND are supposed to be unconditionally exported with their values reduced to enabled USE flags listed in IUSE. In