Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-09-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2019-09-08 at 15:20 +, Conrad Kostecki wrote: > Hi Michał, > > Am 08.09.2019 11:23:06, "Michał Górny" schrieb: > > > sys-apps/lcdutils > > > this package is for an old Sun Cobalt Qube, which was only mips and x86. > I could bump to newer EAPI, since I have such hardware and could

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-09-08 Thread Conrad Kostecki
Hi Michał, Am 08.09.2019 11:23:06, "Michał Górny" schrieb: sys-apps/lcdutils this package is for an old Sun Cobalt Qube, which was only mips and x86. I could bump to newer EAPI, since I have such hardware and could test. But I only have a x86 qube, I don't own the older mips variant.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-09-08 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sun, 08 Sep 2019, Michał Górny wrote: > Here's a better list, containing intersection of x86-only + EAPI 0: > media-video/maven-poke > net-misc/netprofiles-ims > sys-boot/psoload AFAICS, these three are not redistributable (with wrong LICENSE info in their ebuilds) and have dead

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-09-08 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 10:03 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > We still have a lot of packages that are keyworded ~x86/x86 but were > never keyworded ~amd64. While I suppose there might be exceptions to > that, in most cases it means that simply nobody has been using it for > years. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-09-01 Thread David Seifert
On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 22:20 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 13:14 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 1:04 AM Michał Górny > > wrote: > > > sys-fs/hfsplusutils > > > > Your script should probably check for other keywords as well. This > > package is almost

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-09-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 21:56 +0100, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:03:47 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > dev-games/flinker > > This builds and starts on amd64 but I'm dubious about whether it would > work correctly in practise. I don't imagine anyone will want to use it. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-09-01 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 13:07 +0200, Nils Freydank wrote: > Hi, > > most of my points were just said. Two additional notes: > > - dev-embedded/jtag says upstream is dead anyway and it > recommends an alternative we have inside our tree, > dev-embedded/urjtag. > > - games-strategy/netpanzer got a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:03:47 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > dev-games/flinker This builds and starts on amd64 but I'm dubious about whether it would work correctly in practise. I don't imagine anyone will want to use it. Best just let it die. > dev-games/gtkradiant This has been superseded a few

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2019-08-31 at 13:14 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 1:04 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > sys-fs/hfsplusutils > > Your script should probably check for other keywords as well. This > package is almost entirely for use on ppc/ppc64 machines. For whatever > reason it has an

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 1:04 AM Michał Górny wrote: > sys-fs/hfsplusutils Your script should probably check for other keywords as well. This package is almost entirely for use on ppc/ppc64 machines. For whatever reason it has an x86 keyword as well, so the lack of an amd64 keyword doesn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 8/31/19 4:03 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > I've already cleaned up some false positives (like svgalib). If you > know more, please let me know. > > ... > dev-libs/gnulib This one has only prefix keywords and is maintained by prefix@. It has a recentish EAPI=6 version.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Nils Freydank
Hi, most of my points were just said. Two additional notes: - dev-embedded/jtag says upstream is dead anyway and it recommends an alternative we have inside our tree, dev-embedded/urjtag. - games-strategy/netpanzer got a rewrite called version 2.something, which looks active/used. Please

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Roy Bamford
Hi Michał, On 2019.08.31 09:03, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, > > We still have a lot of packages that are keyworded ~x86/x86 but were > never keyworded ~amd64. While I suppose there might be exceptions to > that, in most cases it means that simply nobody has been using it for > years. x86,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, L, 31.08.2019 kell 10:03, kirjutas Michał Górny: > x11-drivers/xf86-video-geode This one is a required driver for Geode LX hardware, which is 32bit. Mart signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Mass last-riting of x86-but-not-amd64 packages

2019-08-31 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, We still have a lot of packages that are keyworded ~x86/x86 but were never keyworded ~amd64. While I suppose there might be exceptions to that, in most cases it means that simply nobody has been using it for years. Many of them are still at EAPI 0; some were ported to newer EAPIs