Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux platforms

2008-10-17 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 20:11 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: sparc-solaris sparc64-solaris x64-solaris x86-solaris Perhaps using KEYWORDS for Prefix keywords is not the best thing to do, and should we use something like PREFIX_KEYWORDS? Maybe there is one thing we

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux platforms

2008-10-10 Thread Jeremy Olexa
Fabian Groffen wrote: snip Most notably, in Prefix all keywords are full GLEP53 style, which results in e.g. amd64-linux. We did this on purpose, because in Prefix we don't necessarily are on Gentoo Linux. We also chose to expand fbsd, nbsd and obsd to their long variants, mainly because the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux platforms

2008-10-10 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 20:11 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: ia64-hpux There's one thing to say for this platform to avoid later confusion: 'ia64-hpux' is the keyword for 32bit on that platform. 'ia64w-hpux' would be the 64bit keyword (not in prefix-tree yet). This might seem confusing,

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux platforms

2008-10-09 Thread Fabian Groffen
Hi all, In the Prefix project we support a bunch of Linux and non-Linux platforms, for which we use GLEP53-style[1] keywords. The current list of keywords known in Prefix are (in no particular order): ppc-aix x86-freebsd ia64-hpux hppa-hpux x86-interix

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux platforms

2008-10-09 Thread Marius Mauch
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:11:01 +0200 Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: amd64-linux x64-openbsd x64-solaris Is there a special reason why you're using x64 instead of amd64 in those cases? (IMO x64 is the most stupid name for the x86_64 architecture) Marius