Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into?

2012-02-01 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 02/01/2012 09:42 AM, ScytheMan wrote:
> Take a look at g15daemon (useful for some logitech keyboards).
> 
> There you have:
> 
> app-misc/g15daemon
> dev-libs/libg15
> 

Great, thanks!

Best,




Sebastian



Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into?

2012-02-01 Thread ScytheMan
Take a look at g15daemon (useful for some logitech keyboards).

There you have:

app-misc/g15daemon
dev-libs/libg15



Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into?

2012-02-01 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 07:01 +0100, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
>   spacenavd
> driver daemon (with optional X support)
>   --> sys-apps/spacenavd ?
>   --> app-misc/spacenavd ?
>   --> .. ?

I would suggest either sys-apps or x11-drivers.

>   libspnav
> library accessing before-mentioned daemon
>   --> dev-libs/libspnav ?
>   --> media-libs/libspnav ?
>   --> sys-libs/libspnav ?
>   --> .. ?

dev-libs seems reasonable.

sys-libs definitely feels wrong, libspnav would look out of place in
that exclusive company of core system libraries.

-Alexandre




[gentoo-dev] [rfc] Which ebuild category should these ebulds go into?

2012-01-31 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello!


Anthoine and I are working on some new ebuilds related to a 3D mouse at
the moment.  For two of these I wonder what package category makes a
good fit.  While I would save your time on such a simple thing, I would
like to avoid moving around things later, too.  I have inspected the
related metadata.xml files already.

Which categories do you advise for?

  spacenavd
driver daemon (with optional X support)
  --> sys-apps/spacenavd ?
  --> app-misc/spacenavd ?
  --> .. ?

  libspnav
library accessing before-mentioned daemon
  --> dev-libs/libspnav ?
  --> media-libs/libspnav ?
  --> sys-libs/libspnav ?
  --> .. ?

  spnavcfg
X11/GTK GUI tool for configuration
  --> x11-misc/spnavcfg seems right

Thanks in advance!

Best,



Sebastian