i will drop iputils from @system:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/563148
but not until our releases are sorted out:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/393445
and i'll see if we can't get that sorted out sooner rather than later
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 15/10/15 06:57 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Mike Frysinger
> wrote:
>> iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it
>> only installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to
>> require all
On 10/15/2015 03:26 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 10/14/2015 11:39 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only
>> installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require
>> all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long i
On 10/14/2015 11:39 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only
> installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require
> all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long idea of
> releasing stage4's instead of stage3's ?
> -
On 10/15/15 4:13 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:08:54 +0200
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote:
iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only
installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require
all syste
On 10/15/15 4:08 AM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote:
iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only
installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require
all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long idea of
re
On 10/14/15 11:39 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only
installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require
all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long idea of
releasing stage4's instead of stage3's ?
-mike
i c
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only
> installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require
> all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long idea of
> releasing stage4's instead of sta
Andrew Udvare wrote:
>> On 2015-10-14, at 23:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>
>> iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only
>> installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require
>> all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long idea of
>> releasing s
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:08:54 +0200
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only
> > installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require
> > all systems include it ? or should t
Hi!
On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only
> installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require
> all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long idea of
> releasing stage4's instead of stage3's ?
> On 2015-10-14, at 23:39, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only
> installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require
> all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long idea of
> releasing stage4's instead of stage3
iputils is currently in @system for everyone. by default, it only
installs `ping`. do we feel strongly enough about this to require
all systems include it ? or should this wait for the long idea of
releasing stage4's instead of stage3's ?
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
13 matches
Mail list logo
