-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
I have created another script yesterday that can auto-merge information
from gitosis.conf into repositories.xml. With that script in a Git hook
setting up new Git-based Gentoo-hosted overlays requires changes at only
an
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 17:57 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
Point remains that it looks in-consistant, for repo, name is an
attribute, while for owner it is a sub-element. Why having attributes
in the first place anyway?
It's closer to the original
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 18:17 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Sure. Just periodically fetch the repository centrally. Have a master
list of sync URLs with expected repository names, and use that to
generate the full master list that includes metadata.
Added
On Thursday 01 October 2009, Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 30.09.2009, 18:17 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Sure. Just periodically fetch the repository centrally. Have a
master list of sync URLs with expected repository names, and use
that to generate
Tiziano Müller wrote:
What if that metadata format changes later or is extended by
additional required entries?
How about using the power of xml and version the schemas? As long as the
metadata-file specifies the respective dtd/xsd/relaxng you know exactly
how to validate (and parse) it and
Tiziano Müller wrote:
A simple rule of thumb is: use attributes for values with predefined
contents, use elements otherwise. So, make name an element please.
Okay, let's give it a try.
Am Montag, den 28.09.2009, 20:23 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
repositories.xml
=
repo
name=sping
quality=experimental
status=unofficial
descriptionGentoo overlay of Sebastian Pipping/description
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:23:34 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
Now please ask questions and let us know what you think.
Here's an alternative idea:
* Move the repository information into the overlays themselves. Require
overlays to provide a file containing the
Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Montag, den 28.09.2009, 20:23 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
repositories.xml
=
repo
name=sping
quality=experimental
status=unofficial
descriptionGentoo overlay of
On 30-09-2009 17:36:47 +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Tiziano Müller wrote:
Am Montag, den 28.09.2009, 20:23 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Pipping:
repositories.xml
=
repo
name=sping
quality=experimental
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:23:34 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
Now please ask questions and let us know what you think.
Here's an alternative idea:
* Move the repository information into the overlays themselves. Require
overlays to provide a
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:51:02 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
At the moment moving overlay meta info into the overlays does not seem
like a good idea to. It would mean that any script working with
overlays needs to check the repo out to get to that data. That
doesn't
Fabian Groffen wrote:
Point remains that it looks in-consistant, for repo, name is an
attribute, while for owner it is a sub-element. Why having attributes
in the first place anyway?
It's closer to the original layman-global.txt which also makes the
converter scripts simpler (and faster) than
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:51:02 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
At the moment moving overlay meta info into the overlays does not seem
like a good idea to. It would mean that any script working with
overlays needs to check the repo out to get to that
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:00:13 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:51:02 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
At the moment moving overlay meta info into the overlays does not
seem like a good idea to. It
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 08:23:34PM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hello there!
This may look like like a lot of text but it actually isn't.
Please read on. Thanks.
Thanks for your good work.
I agree with your changes it was indeed needed.
Actually, during my GSOC, I've noted
volk...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think we
should introduce a longdescription field even with a lang parameter
like we already have in metadata.xml.
Done.
http://git.goodpoint.de/?p=overlays-xml-specification.git;a=commit;h=c13a394fe1a868012548b2be5fb58359b3bc2891
Sebastian
Hello there!
This may look like like a lot of text but it actually isn't.
Please read on. Thanks.
During the last few days rbu and I have been teaming up on a proposal
implementation improving on some of the issues that persist around
layman-global.txt. (previously summarized in [1])
Both
18 matches
Mail list logo
