On 03/07/2010 11:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 07 March 2010 14:08:29 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 03/07/2010 08:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15
On Sunday 07 March 2010 14:08:29 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/07/2010 08:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM
On 03/07/2010 08:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> sometimes i have optional patches
On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>> sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the "patches should always
> >>> be ap
On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the "patches should always be
>>> applied") where autotools should be run. always inheriting autot
On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the "patches should always be
> > applied") where autotools should be run. always inheriting autotools is
> > currently annoying because it always
On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the "patches should always be
> applied") where autotools should be run. always inheriting autotools is
> currently annoying because it always adds the related dependencies. USE based
> inherits are obviou
sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the "patches should always be
applied") where autotools should be run. always inheriting autotools is
currently annoying because it always adds the related dependencies. USE based
inherits are obviously out.
so unless there's some burgeoning standard i
