[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-10-05 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:17:05 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Hill wrote: Though I'm still not sure what happens when a package is in two unrelated sets.. @gnome: RDEPEND==gnome-extra/gnome-screensaver-2.22.2

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-10-04 Thread Ryan Hill
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:51:53 + Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zac Medico wrote: Ryan Hill wrote: Though what happens if a package is in both sets which have conflicting flags in package.use? I would say that the nested set has to have priority. If not, I can

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-10-04 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 4 Oct 2008 00:05:53 -0600 Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 02 Oct 2008 02:51:53 + Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ryan, I disagree with your proposal. If I enable a use flag for the meta @kde and also disable it for @kdenetwork, I don't expect my

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-10-04 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Hill wrote: Though I'm still not sure what happens when a package is in two unrelated sets.. @gnome: RDEPEND==gnome-extra/gnome-screensaver-2.22.2 @xfce4: RDEPEND=gnome-extra/gnome-screensaver package.use: @gnome

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-10-02 Thread Robert Bridge
On Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:37:25 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Hill wrote: On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:31:46 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can package.use syntax be extended to allow set entries? @compiz-fusion

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-10-01 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Hill wrote: On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:31:46 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can package.use syntax be extended to allow set entries? @compiz-fusion -gnome kde kde4 Perhaps, but we need to clarify how that sort of setting will affect

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-10-01 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zac Medico wrote: Ryan Hill wrote: On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:31:46 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can package.use syntax be extended to allow set entries? @compiz-fusion -gnome kde kde4 Perhaps, but we need to clarify how that sort of

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-09-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 22:31:46 -0700 Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can package.use syntax be extended to allow set entries? @compiz-fusion -gnome kde kde4 Perhaps, but we need to clarify how that sort of setting will affect nested sets. For example, if @compiz-fusion contains nested

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-09-29 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:56:27 -0700: For example, `emerge kde-meta` would behave as as normal meta-package currently does, and `emerge @kde-meta` would

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-09-29 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:40:10 -0700: I'm not suggesting that the ebuild and the package set necessarily need to have the same name. What I'm suggesting is that we use a configuration file, distributed with the ebuild

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-09-29 Thread Steve Long
Zac Medico wrote: Rémi Cardona wrote: Zac Medico a écrit : Please consider a PROPERTIES=set value that allows an ebuild to indicate that it should behave like a package set when selected on the command line. This is behavior is somewhat difficult to describe in words but the following

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-09-29 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Steve Long wrote: Zac Medico wrote: Rémi Cardona wrote: Zac Medico a écrit : Please consider a PROPERTIES=set value that allows an ebuild to indicate that it should behave like a package set when selected on the command line. This is behavior

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=set for meta-packages that should behave like package sets

2008-09-28 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:56:27 -0700: For example, `emerge kde-meta` would behave as as normal meta-package currently does, and `emerge @kde-meta` would reference the same package as a set and could thereby trigger