Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 30 Mar
2008 20:39:14 -0400:
there is no package-manager specificness here. it's already completely
doable from a user perspective, just having it in the ebuild makes my
life and users' lives easier. i'm
В Пнд, 31/03/2008 в 06:21 +, Duncan пишет:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 30 Mar
2008 20:39:14 -0400:
there is no package-manager specificness here. it's already completely
doable from a user perspective, just having it in the
Mark Loeser wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sunday 30 March 2008, Mark Loeser wrote:
Actually, I'd say this should just be removed. If a user wants to apply
a patch, they can put their own ebuild into an overlay and do it
themselves (presumably if they want to patch
Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:15:45 +0400:
It possible to use /etc/portage/bashrc to have this infrastructure.
Search mailing list, it was discussed here at least twice, and this is
example from solar:
On 2008/03/31, Vlastimil Babka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that maybe we should first introduce new patching phase and
then make this user patch really usable feature. For example if you
want to patch something that's input to running autotools, doing it
in post_src_unpack is too late...
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On 17:26 Sat 29 Mar , Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
1.1 sys-apps/iproute2/iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild
file :
Mark Loeser schrieb:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
that's actually exactly what i'm encouraging. i'm not worried about such
issues as they're easily resolved by people posting the full build log.
Which is great, but I think this is something we should discuss and
figure out if this
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:18:44 -0400
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is something we want to move forward with, it should be
introduced at the package manager level instead of being an in-tree
package manager specific feature.
cat /etc/paludis/hooks/ebuild_unpack_post/patches.bash
(
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:18:44 -0400
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is something we want to move forward with, it should be
introduced at the package manager level instead of being an in-tree
package manager specific feature.
cat
On Sunday 30 March 2008, Mark Loeser wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sunday 30 March 2008, Mark Loeser wrote:
Actually, I'd say this should just be removed. If a user wants to
apply a patch, they can put their own ebuild into an overlay and do it
themselves
On 17:26 Sat 29 Mar , Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote:
1.1 sys-apps/iproute2/iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/iproute2/iproute2-2.6.24.20080108.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
plain:
11 matches
Mail list logo
