David Leverton wrote:
> On Sunday 10 May 2009 09:58:22 Ryan Hill wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:00:17 -0600
>>
>> Ryan Hill wrote:
>>> You can't test FEATURES in an ebuild. It's portage-specific.
>> Actually, am I right?
>
> Yes. (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239671#c10 gives a bett
On Mon, 11 May 2009 23:29:10 +1200
Alistair Bush wrote:
> I would assume it would be better to directly test whether the user is
> root, than test that userpriv is set?
AFAIK:
if [[ ${EUID} -eq 0 ]]; then
rootstuff
else
nonrootstuff
fi
But for tests that fail with userpriv just because the
>
> You can't test FEATURES in an ebuild. It's portage-specific.
>
To 1) try and turn this thread into something a little more constructive
and a little less childish; and 2) help improve the tree. I present one
of the offending ebuilds dev-java/commons-io
Without posting the whole file her
Fabian Groffen said:
> On 11-05-2009 11:26:46 +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > FEATURE-misuse.txt was generated by
> > $ find -name '*.ebuild' | xargs grep -nH FEATURES >
> > FEATURES-misuse.txt and sifting through the false positives.
>
> Have you checked if eclasses use it as well?
nope - thanks
On 11-05-2009 11:26:46 +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
> FEATURE-misuse.txt was generated by
> $ find -name '*.ebuild' | xargs grep -nH FEATURES > FEATURES-misuse.txt
> and sifting through the false positives.
Have you checked if eclasses use it as well?
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different leve
a list cleaned for obvious false positives leaves the following 44 affected
packages.
i have treated ebuilds which mention FEATURES in an ewarn or einfo as
false positives although they probably should be fixed as well.
most of these have do one of the following (or a variant thereof)
hasq test
On Sun, 10 May 2009 10:41:03 +0100
David Leverton wrote:
> On Sunday 10 May 2009 09:58:22 Ryan Hill wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:00:17 -0600
> >
> > Ryan Hill wrote:
> > > You can't test FEATURES in an ebuild. It's portage-specific.
> >
> > Actually, am I right?
>
> Yes. (http://bugs.gen
On Sunday 10 of May 2009 14:47:45 Ben de Groot wrote:
> Thilo Bangert wrote:
> >> Welcome to Gentoo.
> >
> > nice attitude...
> > i am sure that'll make the problem go away :-(
>
> What do you expect? He's an exherbo dev, only here to criticize Gentoo
> and gloat over its perceived failings.
Shut
Thilo Bangert wrote:
> Ben de Groot said:
> and what exactly are _you_ contributing?
> i was trying to point out, that somebody was rather unhelpful, and all you
> can come up with is being unhelpful? we can do better than that!
I thought I was helpful in pointing out that certain people cannot
Ben de Groot posted 4a06ccf1.7040...@gentoo.org,
excerpted below, on Sun, 10 May 2009 14:47:45 +0200:
> Thilo Bangert wrote:
>
>>> Welcome to Gentoo.
>>
>> nice attitude...
>> i am sure that'll make the problem go away :-(
>>
> What do you expect? He's an exherbo dev, only here to criticize G
Ben de Groot said:
> Thilo Bangert wrote:
> >> Welcome to Gentoo.
> >
> > nice attitude...
> > i am sure that'll make the problem go away :-(
>
> What do you expect? He's an exherbo dev, only here to criticize Gentoo
> and gloat over its perceived failings.
and what exactly are _you_ contributing
David Leverton wrote:
> On Sunday 10 May 2009 14:02:57 Ben de Groot wrote:
>> Just your activity on Gentoo channels (IRC, ML, etc), which is what my
>> assessment is based on.
>
> Nothing I've ever done anywhere, in Gentoo channels or elsewhere, in any way
> implies that I'm "only here to critici
On Sunday 10 May 2009 14:02:57 Ben de Groot wrote:
> Just your activity on Gentoo channels (IRC, ML, etc), which is what my
> assessment is based on.
Nothing I've ever done anywhere, in Gentoo channels or elsewhere, in any way
implies that I'm "only here to criticize Gentoo and gloat over its per
On Sunday 10 May 2009 14:02:48 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> It's even more hilarious that you expect to "fix" Gentoo's problems by
> bitching about them.
Same to you as I said to yngwin.
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 6:22 PM, David Leverton
wrote:
> On Sunday 10 May 2009 13:47:45 Ben de Groot wrote:
>> What do you expect? He's an exherbo dev, only here to criticize Gentoo
>> and gloat over its perceived failings.
>
> It's pretty hilarious that you think you know anything about me.
>
It
David Leverton wrote:
> It's pretty hilarious that you think you know anything about me.
>
Just your activity on Gentoo channels (IRC, ML, etc), which is what my
assessment is based on.
Cheers,
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc)
Gentoo Linux Release Engineeri
On Sunday 10 May 2009 13:47:45 Ben de Groot wrote:
> What do you expect? He's an exherbo dev, only here to criticize Gentoo
> and gloat over its perceived failings.
It's pretty hilarious that you think you know anything about me.
Thilo Bangert wrote:
>> Welcome to Gentoo.
>
> nice attitude...
> i am sure that'll make the problem go away :-(
>
What do you expect? He's an exherbo dev, only here to criticize Gentoo
and gloat over its perceived failings.
--
Ben de Groot
Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-mis
> > There's a crapload of stuff in the tree doing
> > things like this and worse with FEATURES.
there is roughly 150 packages using FEATURES (including a number of false
positives). see the list below...
FEATURES variable is used in the tree
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174335
>
> Wel
On Sunday 10 May 2009 09:58:22 Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:00:17 -0600
>
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > You can't test FEATURES in an ebuild. It's portage-specific.
>
> Actually, am I right?
Yes. (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=239671#c10 gives a better
approach for this particul
On Sun, 10 May 2009 02:00:17 -0600
Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 10 May 2009 07:38:43 +
> "Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" wrote:
>
> > ssuominen09/05/10 07:38:43
> >
> > Modified: ChangeLog cdrdao-1.2.2-r3.ebuild
> > Log:
> > Doesn't compile with distcc wrt #264170.
> >
On Sun, 10 May 2009 07:38:43 +
"Samuli Suominen (ssuominen)" wrote:
> ssuominen09/05/10 07:38:43
>
> Modified: ChangeLog cdrdao-1.2.2-r3.ebuild
> Log:
> Doesn't compile with distcc wrt #264170.
> (Portage version: 2.1.6.13/cvs/Linux x86_64)
> +pkg_setup() {
> + i
22 matches
Mail list logo
