-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:06:36 +
"Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" wrote:
> Does everyone using the desktop profile really need all of the
> following?
Not the question to be asking. The question to ask is, for those people
who use packages where those
El jue, 23-07-2009 a las 03:06 +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
escribió:
> Please don't.
> Instead of having an ever larger collection of default use flags in the
> desktop profile, we should be taking advantage of EAPI-1 IUSE defaults
> and EAPI-2 use dependencies.
It's other way to go, of cour
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> Have you think about enabling "cdda" USE flag by default in *desktop*
>> profiles? I think that most of "desktop" users will want to get cdaudio
>> support by default
>
> Please don't.
I wasn't going to. Maybe not for the reasons expected;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El mié, 22-07-2009 a las 18:45 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
>> Lars Wendler wrote:
>>> Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of
>>> the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection agai
Josh Saddler wrote:
> Lars Wendler wrote:
>> Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of
>> the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the
>> decision to unify/convert the "cdaudio" USE flag into "cdda".
>> If there's no good reason against this
Lars Wendler wrote:
> Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of
> the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the
> decision to unify/convert the "cdaudio" USE flag into "cdda".
> If there's no good reason against this conversion I will proceed
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Have you think about enabling "cdda" USE flag by default in *desktop*
> profiles? I think that most of "desktop" users will want to get cdaudio
> support by default
There's quite a few notebooks without cd/dvd drives around these days.
I cannot tell how much that's in percent
El mié, 22-07-2009 a las 18:45 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> Lars Wendler wrote:
> > Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of
> > the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the
> > decision to unify/convert the "cdaudio" USE flag into "c
Lars Wendler wrote:
> Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of
> the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the
> decision to unify/convert the "cdaudio" USE flag into "cdda".
> If there's no good reason against this conversion I will proceed
Lars Wendler wrote:
> Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of
> the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the
> decision to unify/convert the "cdaudio" USE flag into "cdda".
> If there's no good reason against this conversion I will proceed
Let's finally move on regarding this topic. As I'm also in favour of
the "cdda" USE flag I'd like to know if there's any objection against the
decision to unify/convert the "cdaudio" USE flag into "cdda".
If there's no good reason against this conversion I will proceed with filing
bugs against p
Jesús Guerrero posted
524cf6368e2642a1637e6e3054466e3d.squir...@jesgue.homelinux.org, excerpted
below, on Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:30:58 +0200:
> On Tue, July 7, 2009 15:35, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>> Le mardi 07 juillet 2009 à 13:57 +0100, AllenJB a écrit : [snip]
>>
>>> Are users really goin
12 matches
Mail list logo
