On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 02:50 -0700, Duncan wrote:
What I'd do with such bugs is thank the user, but say next time, please
give me a few days, at least a week (or whatever a dev feels comfortable
with for that package, again, it'll vary) -- if it's /just/ a bump
request. If I take over a
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:53:37 -0700 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Consider this: INVALID is strong enough, under the wrong
| circumstances, that it /could/ set an emotionally unstable user off,
| causing them to commit suicide or something.
Some people go around setting fire to embassies when
Daniel Drake posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:24:45 +:
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
[Danial Drake wrote...]
3. Always record contributions by name
If you commit something in response to a bug report that has been filed,
always thank the user by full name
Duncan wrote:
I'd /not/ really wish to encourage version bump requests overnight.
That's jumping the gun, and indeed, could encourage first post like
behavior.
What I'd do with such bugs is thank the user, but say next time, please
give me a few days, at least a week (or whatever a dev feels
On 2/13/06, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But... If INVALID is renamed, could we get a new GOAWAY resolution for
people who really deserve it?
I would tend to agree with this. I myself was the 'victim' of an
aggressively worded INVALID resolution to a bug report I filed due to
my
Duncan wrote:
Consider this: INVALID is strong enough, under the wrong circumstances,
that it /could/ set an emotionally unstable user off, causing them to
commit suicide or something. I /know/ it was deeply depressing here,
that first time, altho the effect on me would have been to simply
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:39:06 +0100 Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Are you being serious about this?
Sadly, even if he is, there're enough people around here that're taking
that kind of thought seriously (see, for example, my sarcastic post on
the 0day -core thread that so many people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:39:06 +0100 Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Are you being serious about this?
Sadly, even if he is, there're enough people around here that're taking
that kind of thought seriously (see,
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:00:48PM -0500, Patrick McLean wrote:
How about RICER or RICERFLAGS :)
+1. RESOLVED RICER has such a nice ring to it :)
--
Marien.
pgp70IcstDKz0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:07:51 +0100 Grobian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| If these frustrations get so apparent that they require a solution
| flag in Bugzilla for a developer, then it might be a better solution
| to just leave the bugzilla work to someone else and try to work a bit
| more away from
On Monday 13 February 2006 19:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
They also deserve it if they stick it in their CXXFLAGS...
In that case even more, as it actually does something: break stuff.
--
Diego Flameeyes Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64,
On 13-02-2006 21:02:28 +0100, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Monday 13 February 2006 20:29, Grobian wrote:
Maybe that has to change then? Like getting more bug wranglers that
also handle canned responses as a first-line helpdesk?
Wrangle bugs a few months and you'll see how hard it can be to
On 2/13/06, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But... If INVALID is renamed, could we get a new GOAWAY resolution for
people who really deserve it?
Like others here, I've also felt a bit stunned at an INVALID bug. Personally, I
don't think anything needs to be renamed, but I would like
Duncan wrote:
2. Be careful with INVALID resolutions
The term invalid _is_ harsh in bugzilla context, so make sure you write
a quick thankful-sounding comment to go with it.
I like all the suggestions, but this one hits a particular sore spot, as I
had it happen to me, with I think my second
14 matches
Mail list logo
