Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86

2005-12-01 Thread Jason Wever
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:17:31 -0600 R Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All arches other than x86 have made the switch to 3.4 stable already. They did so without problem and without extra docs. Why does x86, the last to switch, need to be special-cased? Actually, SPARC isn't even onto gcc-3.4 in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86

2005-12-01 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 23:17 -0600, R Hill wrote: That makes me feel a bit more comfortable. I still think that something more then an einfo warning should be provided, as its easy to overlook those. All arches other than x86 have made the switch to 3.4 stable already. They did so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86

2005-12-01 Thread Lares Moreau
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 23:17 -0600, R Hill wrote: All arches other than x86 have made the switch to 3.4 stable already. They did so without problem and without extra docs. Why does x86, the last to switch, need to be special-cased? From what I understand, most other archs have done the