Tach Ramon, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Thanks for that post.
Ramon van Alteren schrieb:
> 9. Most of this mail has been on policies, expected behavior and
> perceived behavior. I would like to get this discussion back to
> technical issues wrt to generating stages/see
Thomas Cort wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:11:17 -0400
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> why does it need to be part of releng ?
>
> releng and seeds will be doing similar tasks, releasing stage tarballs.
Might I ask why it needs to be anywhere specific until it's actually had
m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Being a top level project, you are in essence saying that we want to do
> this on our own without the help of a group that has been doing a less
> focused version of what you are aiming to provide. It goes against the
> entire point of the cooperatio
Hi All,
It's always interesting to be part of a project that seems to be
in-focus considering the reply's, especially if it's your first within a
OSS-group. It's a long reply, but please bear with me (is that correct
english ?)
Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 9/20/06, Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTEC
Stuart Herbert wrote:
On 9/20/06, Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, now it's gotten to the point where people are being sneaky and
underhanded
about this whole thing. Stuart (I believe) said that they had talked
to members
of releng about this, but the truth seems to be that Stuar
On 9/20/06, Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, now it's gotten to the point where people are being sneaky and underhanded
about this whole thing. Stuart (I believe) said that they had talked to members
of releng about this, but the truth seems to be that Stuart talked with rocket
and
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 16:01, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
> Well, now it's gotten to the point where people are being sneaky and
> underhanded about this whole thing.
jesus give over and stop nit picking
when they're ready to actually make a release and they dont go through releng,
feel free t
Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote:
Tach Andrew, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Andrew Gaffney schrieb:
As somebody's already mentioned, the embedded project releases GNAP and
has a releng liaison. There's no reason the seeds project couldn't also
have a releng liaison,
Tach Andrew, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Andrew Gaffney schrieb:
>> As somebody's already mentioned, the embedded project releases GNAP and
>> has a releng liaison. There's no reason the seeds project couldn't also
>> have a releng liaison, which seems to resolve the ma
