Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is this something worth pinching for a future EAPI? If we go with the
postfix [] form for ranged deps, it'd translate into:
LICENSE==GPL-2 (or equivalently, LICENSE=GPL[=2])
LICENSE=|| ( GPL[=2] BSD ) (or equivalently,
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is this something worth pinching for a future EAPI? If we go with the
postfix [] form for ranged deps, it'd translate into:
LICENSE==GPL-2 (or equivalently, LICENSE=GPL[=2])
LICENSE=|| ( GPL[=2] BSD ) (or equivalently, =GPL-2)
LICENSE=|| (
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:06:46 +0100
Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One thing that would need to be decided:
LICENSE=GPL-2
Would that require an = prefix? To simplify things, we could say
that *only* the postfix [] form counts for licenses...
To have backwards
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:54:57 +0100
Thilo Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
there is also the legal argument. it's better to state explicitly
which versions apply and not have to cleanup the mess, when somebody
decides to release GPL-2.5.
That's an argument strongly in
